| Literature DB >> 27695517 |
Araceli Rodríguez-Romero1, Michael D Jarrold2, Gloria Massamba-N'Siala3, John I Spicer4, Piero Calosi5.
Abstract
Little is known of the capacity that marine metazoans have to evolve under rapid p CO 2 changes. Consequently, we reared a marine polychaete, Ophryotrocha labronica, previously cultured for approximately 33 generations under a low/variable pH regime, under elevated and low p CO 2 for six generations. The strain used was found to be tolerant to elevated p CO 2 conditions. In generations F1 and F2 females' fecundity was significantly lower in the low p CO 2 treatment. However, from generation F3 onwards there were no differences between p CO 2 treatments, indicating that trans-generational effects enabled the restoration and maintenance of reproductive output. Whilst the initial fitness recovery was likely driven by trans-generational plasticity (TGP), the results from reciprocal transplant assays, performed using F7 individuals, made it difficult to disentangle between whether TGP had persisted across multiple generations, or if evolutionary adaptation had occurred. Nonetheless, both are important mechanisms for persistence under climate change. Overall, our study highlights the importance of multi-generational experiments in more accurately determining marine metazoans' responses to changes in p CO 2, and strengthens the case for exploring their use in conservation, by creating specific p CO 2 tolerant strains of keystone ecosystem species.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive potential; climate change; evolutionary adaptation; fecundity; multi‐generational experiment; ocean acidification; parental effects; trans‐generational plasticity
Year: 2015 PMID: 27695517 PMCID: PMC5039322 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Mean pH of the worm laboratory cultures measured daily for a 3‐month period.
Physico‐chemical parameters of seawater for the elevated and low p CO 2 treatments. Values are means ±1 SD for pH (NBS scale), salinity, temperature, total alkalinity (TA), carbon dioxide partial pressure (p CO 2), bicarbonate and carbonate ion concentration ([]) and ([]), and calcite and aragonite saturation states (Ωcal and Ωara)
| Parameter | Elevated | Low |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.68 ± 0.06A | 7.99 ± 0.06B |
| Salinity | 34.05 ± 1.04A | 33.76 ± 1.24A |
| Temperature (°C) | 27.11 ± 0.46A | 27.16 ± 0.53A |
| TA (μequiv kg−1) | 2178.77 ± 178.12A | 2201.66 ± 70.05A |
|
| 1137.28 ± 193.05A | 461.91 ± 36.21B |
| [ | 1955.76 ± 167.23A | 1759.04 ± 58.48B |
| [ | 92.58 ± 10.76A | 182.47 ± 14.52B |
| Ω cal | 2.23 ± 0.26A | 4.39 ± 0.35B |
| Ω ara | 1.47 ± 0.17A | 2.89 ± 0.23B |
Superscript capital letters indicate a significant difference between treatments by way of GLM's (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Diagram of the experimental design. E: elevated p CO 2; L: low p CO 2.
Figure 3Experiment 1: effect of the multi‐generational exposure to elevated and low p CO 2 on mean fecundity (A) and juvenile growth rates (B) of O. labronica. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) between p CO 2 treatments within a generation. Capital and lower case letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between generations for the elevated and low p CO 2 treatments, respectively. Bar charts represent mean values ±95% CI. Numbers of replicates are reported in Table S1.
Mean generation values ±95% CI for all traits measured for the marine polychaete
| Trait | Generation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | |
| Juvenile growth rates (number of chaetigers day−1) | 0.92 ± 0.04A (80) | 1.25 ± 0.02B (180) | 1.31 ± 0.03C (175) | 1.41 ± 0.03E (180) | 1.46 ± 0.03E (170) | 1.34 ± 0.03C,D (180) | 1.40 ± 0.03D,E (180) |
| Juvenile survival (%) | 79.69 ± 10.10A,B (16) | 83.33 ± 3.78A,B (36) | 80.29 ± 4.96A (35) | 87.22 ± 4.29A,B (36) | 89.71 ± 3.51B (34) | 88.61 ± 2.80B (36) | 83.47 ± 2.46A,B (36) |
| Adult size (number of chaetigers) | 14.21 ± 0.34A (34) | 15.37 ± 0.30B (35) | 15.44 ± 0.28B (34) | 15.89 ± 0.21B (35) | 15.75 ± 0.33B (36) | 15.40 ± 0.22B (35) | |
| Fecundity (number of eggs chaetiger−1) | 5.13 ± 0.83A (34) | 7.45 ± 0.48B (35) | 9.85 ± 0.72C,D (34) | 10.38 ± 0.81D (35) | 9.46 ± 0.82C,D (36) | 8.55 ± 0.48C (35) | |
| Egg volume (×10−3 mm3) | 0.61 ± 0.01 (340) | 0.62 ± 0.01 (350) | 0.62 ± 0.01 (340) | 0.61 ± 0.01 (350) | 0.61 ± 0.01 (360) | 0.61 ± 0.01 (350) | |
| Metabolic rates (μmol O2 h−1 STPD) | 0.23 ± 0.02A (34) | 0.27 ± 0.03A,B (35) | 0.27 ± 0.02A,B (34) | 0.27 ± 0.02A,B (35) | 0.29 ± 0.02B (36) | 0.29 ± 0.04A,B (18) | |
Capital letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between generations. Numbers of replicates are provided in parentheses.
Mean values ± 95% CI for all traits measured in the marine polychaete in the reciprocal transplant assay experiment
| Trait | Transplant assay | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevated‐Elevated | Elevated‐Low | Low‐Low | Low‐Elevated | |
| Juvenile growth rates (number of chaetigers day−1) | 1.40 ± 0.03 (90) | 1.40 ± 0.04 (85) | 1.40 ± 0.04 (90) | 1.39 ± 0.04 (90) |
| Juvenile survival (%) | 82.22 ± 4.09 (18) | 78.23 ± 4.59 (17) | 84.72 ± 2.91 (18) | 79.44 ± 5.43 (18) |
| Adult size (number of chaetigers) | 15.41 ± 0.29 (17) | 15.12 ± 0.33 (17) | 15.39 ± 0.32 (18) | 14.94 ± 0.24 (18) |
| Fecundity (number of eggs chaetiger−1) | 22.25 ± 1.33A (17) | 19.54 ± 1.21B (17) | 21.44 ± 1.38A,B (18) | 18.67 ± 1.61B (18) |
| Egg volume (×10−3 mm3) | 0.62 ± 0.02 (170) | 0.59 ± 0.02 (170) | 0.60 ± 0.02 (180) | 0.60 ± 0.02 (180) |
| Metabolic rates (μmol O2 h−1 STPD) | 0.28 ± 0.05 (9) | 0.31 ± 0.03 (9) | 0.29 ± 0.06 (9) | 0.27 ± 0.03 (9) |
Capital letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments. Numbers of replicates are provided in parentheses.
Figure 4Experiment 2: reciprocal transplant assays. Mean fecundity of O. labronica individuals of the F7 generation exposed to either an elevated or low p CO 2 and then transplanted to same (control assay) or other p CO 2 treatments (reciprocal assay). Capital letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between transplant treatments. Bar charts represent mean values ±95% CI. Arrows represent reaction norms between control and reciprocal transplants. Numbers of replicates are reported in Table 3.