Literature DB >> 23374787

A single overnight stay is possible for most patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy.

Ronney Abaza1, Ketul Shah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate establishment of overnight stay only as sufficient after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).
METHODS: Stated benefits of minimally invasive surgery include reduced hospitalization, but published hospital stays after laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy are not significantly less than with open surgery. We developed a clinical pathway targeting discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 after RPN of any complexity. We reviewed all RPNs by a single surgeon since instituting our clinical pathway, including ambulation and diet the night of surgery, avoidance of intravenous narcotics and drains, and catheter removal on POD 1 before discharge. Targeted discharge was not modified regardless of RPN complexity.
RESULTS: A total of 150 consecutive patients underwent 160 RPNs with 35 hilar tumors and 26 with segmental, and 33 with no artery clamping. Three had solitary kidneys, and 8 underwent multiple (range, 2-4) RPNs. Mean patient age was 57 years (range, 22-89 years), and body mass index was 32 kg/m(2) (range, 18-54 kg/m(2)). Mean tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.0-11.0; median, 3.2 cm), and the RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior, and location) nephrometry score was 8 (range, 4-12; median, 8). Mean warm ischemia time was 12.1 minutes (range, 0-30.0 minutes). Mean preoperative and discharge creatinine were 0.9 mg/dL (range, 0.43-2.79 mg/dL) and 1.13 mg/dL (range, 0.56-2.93 mg/dL). All patients ambulated on POD 0. One patient required one dose of intravenous narcotic. Mean length of stay was 1.1 days, with 145 (97%) discharged on POD 1, of which only 4 (2.7%) were readmitted within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Discharge on POD 1 is feasible in most RPN patients regardless of complexity. Readmission rate was low, indicating that longer admissions may not prevent complications when patients meeting discharge criteria go home on POD 1.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23374787     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Predicting length of stay after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Wassim M Bazzi; Daniel D Sjoberg; Angelica A C Grasso; Melanie Bernstein; Raul Parra; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Are we ready for day-case partial nephrectomy?

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Anne Payan; Henri Bensadoun; François Cornelis; Grégory Pierquet; Gilles Pasticier; Grégoire Robert; Grégoire Capon; Alain Ravaud; Jean-Marie Ferriere
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic/robot-assisted urologic surgery and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Teoman Cem Kadioglu
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-02-09

4.  Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Same-day Discharge After Robotic Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Ronney Abaza; Paul Kogan; Oscar Martinez
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Technical considerations in robotic nephrectomy with vena caval tumor thrombectomy.

Authors:  Ronney Abaza
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07

6.  Performing an early systematic Doppler-ultrasound fails to prevent hemorrhagic complications after complex partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Inès Dominique; Charles Dariane; Cyril Fourniol; Thomas Le Guilchet; Sophie Hurel; Eric Fontaine; Eric Mandron; Francois Audenet; Arnaud Mejean; Marc Olivier Timsit
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.