Literature DB >> 23374065

Using parent questionnaires to assess neurodevelopment in former preterm infants: a validation study.

Mandy B Belfort1, Eilann Santo, Marie C McCormick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Former preterm and very low birthweight infants require close neurodevelopmental surveillance after hospital discharge, but in-person professional testing is resource-intensive and inconvenient for families. A standardised developmental questionnaire completed by parents offers an alternative to in-person testing, but few such questionnaires have been validated. Our aim was to validate the Motor and Social Development (MSD) scale in a sample of former preterm infants.
METHODS: We studied 321 visits to a neonatal follow-up clinic. Parents completed the MSD, which measures cognitive, motor and social abilities. Psychologists and physical therapists administered the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd edition (Bayley-III) cognitive and motor scales.
RESULTS: The median (range) gestational age was 28 (23, 34) weeks and birthweight 980 (400, 2700) g. Corrected age at study participation ranged 5-35 months. The mean (standard deviation) Bayley-III motor score was 94 (16), cognitive 98 (16) and MSD 91 (18). Internal consistency of the MSD was moderate to high (Cronbach alpha of 0.65 to 0.88). The MSD was moderately correlated with the Bayley-III motor (Pearson r = 0.49, P < 0.001) and cognitive (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) scales. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81, 0.95] for the MSD to detect a low Bayley-III motor score (<70), and 0.88 [95% CI 0.82, 0.95] for a low cognitive score, indicating good discrimination.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSD has good internal and concurrent validity, and may be useful for neurodevelopmental assessment of former preterm and very low birthweight infants in clinical and research settings.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23374065      PMCID: PMC3564502          DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  13 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas.

Authors:  J L Watts; S Saigal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  A parent-completed developmental questionnaire: follow up of ex-premature infants.

Authors:  C Y Skellern; Y Rogers; M J O'Callaghan
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.954

3.  Parents' evaluation of developmental status in children born with a birthweight of 1250 g or less.

Authors:  Margo A Pritchard; Paul B Colditz; Elaine M Beller
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.954

4.  Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale.

Authors:  Peter J Anderson; Cinzia R De Luca; Esther Hutchinson; Gehan Roberts; Lex W Doyle
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-04

5.  Do parents and professionals agree on the developmental status of high-risk infants?

Authors:  M M Kim; K S O'Connor; J McLean; A Robson; G Chance
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Parental and professional agreement in developmental assessment of very-low-birthweight and term infants.

Authors:  A Heiser; O Curcin; C Luhr; I Grimmer; B Metze; M Obladen
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Birthweight and gestational age effects on motor and social development.

Authors:  Mary L Hediger; Mary D Overpeck; W June Ruan; James F Troendle
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 8.  Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process.

Authors:  C Jason Wang; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Robert H Brook; Carol H Leonard; Robert E Piecuch; Steven I Hsueh; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight, premature infants. A multisite, randomized trial. The Infant Health and Development Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Early educational intervention for very low birth weight infants: results from the Infant Health and Development Program.

Authors:  M C McCormick; C McCarton; J Tonascia; J Brooks-Gunn
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association of WIC Participation and Growth and Developmental Outcomes in High-Risk Infants.

Authors:  Ashwini Lakshmanan; Ashley Y Song; Nicole Flores-Fenlon; Urvashi Parti; Douglas L Vanderbilt; Philippe S Friedlich; Roberta Williams; Michele Kipke
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.168

2.  The impact of preterm birth <37 weeks on parents and families: a cross-sectional study in the 2 years after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ashwini Lakshmanan; Meghana Agni; Tracy Lieu; Eric Fleegler; Michele Kipke; Philippe S Friedlich; Marie C McCormick; Mandy B Belfort
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Targeting human milk fortification to improve very preterm infant growth and brain development: study protocol for Nourish, a single-center randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mandy B Belfort; Lianne J Woodward; Sara Cherkerzian; Hunter Pepin; Deirdre Ellard; Tina Steele; Christoph Fusch; P Ellen Grant; Terrie E Inder
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  The financial burden experienced by families of preterm infants after NICU discharge.

Authors:  Ashwini Lakshmanan; Ashley Y Song; Mandy B Belfort; Leah Yieh; Dmitry Dukhovny; Philippe S Friedlich; Cynthia L Gong
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.521

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.