Literature DB >> 23373567

Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Claire Blumenthal1, Jill Curran, Edward C Benzel, Rachel Potter, Subu N Magge, J Frederick Harrington, Jean-Valery Coumans, Zoher Ghogawala.   

Abstract

OBJECT: It is not known whether adding fusion to lumbar decompression is necessary for all patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with symptomatic stenosis. Determining specific radiographic traits that might predict delayed instability following decompression surgery might guide clinical decision making regarding the utility of up-front fusion in patients with degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: Patients with Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (3-14 mm) with symptomatic stenosis were prospectively enrolled from a single site between May 2002 and September 2009 and treated with decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Patients with mechanical back pain or with gross motion (> 3 mm) on flexion-extension lumbar radiographs were excluded. The baseline radiographic variables measured included amount of slippage, disc height, facet angle, motion at spondylolisthesis (flexion-extension), and sagittal rotation angle. Data were analyzed using multivariate forward selection stepwise logistic regression, chi-square tests, Student t-test, and ANOVA.
RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled and treated with laminectomy without fusion, and all patients had complete radiographic data sets that were available for analysis. Reoperation was performed in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 3.6 years. Reoperation was performed for pain caused by instability at the index level in all 15 cases. Using multivariate stepwise logistic regression with a threshold p value of 0.35, motion at spondylolisthesis, disc height, and facet angle were predictors of reoperation following surgery. Facet angle > 50° was associated with a 39% rate of reoperation, disc height > 6.5 mm was associated with a 45% rate of reoperation, and motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm was associated with a 54% rate of reoperation. Patients with all 3 risk factors for instability had a 75% rate of reoperation, whereas patients with no risk factors for instability had a 0% rate of reoperation (p = 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm, disc height > 6.5 mm, and facet angle > 50° are more likely to experience instability following decompression surgery for Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Identification of key risk factors for instability might improve patient selection for decompression without fusion surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23373567     DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  23 in total

1.  Can facet joint fluid on MRI and dynamic instability be a predictor of improvement in back pain following lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis?

Authors:  Mark C Snoddy; John A Sielatycki; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Stephen M Engstrom; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  South Korean degenerative spondylolisthesis patients had surgical treatment at earlier age than Japanese, American, and European patients: a published literature observation.

Authors:  Zoltán Káplár; Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Point of view: a randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis-lessons learnt and practical considerations.

Authors:  Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

4.  The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Abdulkader Hamad; Amit Bhalla; Sarah Turner; Birender Balain; David Jaffray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Slip progression in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis following minimally invasive decompression surgery is not associated with increased functional disability.

Authors:  Robert A Ravinsky; Eric J Crawford; Luke A Reda; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Good clinical outcomes in nonunion cases after facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Tomohiro Miyashita; Hiromi Ataka; Kei Kato; Hiromitsu Takaoka; Takaaki Tanno
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Liang; Shu-Hao Liu; Zi-Xian Chen; Qin-Ming Fei
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A less invasive treatment by a full-endoscopic spine surgery for adjacent segment disease after lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroki Iwai; Yasushi Oshima; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Hirokazu Inoue; Yuichi Takano; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

9.  Defining Instability in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Surgeon Views.

Authors:  Nicholas Spina; Carlijn Schoutens; Brook I Martin; Darrel S Brodke; Brandon Lawrence; William Ryan Spiker
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2018: dynamic imaging of degenerative spondylolisthesis reveals mid-range dynamic lumbar instability not evident on static clinical radiographs.

Authors:  Malcolm E Dombrowski; Bryan Rynearson; Clarissa LeVasseur; Zach Adgate; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; Ameet Aiyangar; William J Anderst
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.