| Literature DB >> 23372848 |
Tomer Ventura1, Rivka Manor, Eliahu D Aflalo, Vered Chalifa-Caspi, Simy Weil, Omri Sharabi, Amir Sagi.
Abstract
Like many metazoans, the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii begins its post-embryonic life with a set of morphologically distinct planktonic larval stages, followed by a benthic post-larval stage during which the maturing organism differs from the larvae both ecologically and physiologically. Understanding of the molecular basis underlying morphogenesis in crustaceans is limited to the observation that methyl farnesoate, the non-epoxidated form of the insect juvenile hormone, acts as the active crustacean juvenoid. Molt steroids were also linked to morphogenesis and several other molecular pathways, such as Hedgehog and Wnt, are known to underlie morphogenesis in all metazoans examined and, as such, are thought to do the same in crustaceans. Using next generation sequencing, we deep-sequenced the transcriptomes of several larval and post-larval stages. De novo assembly, followed by bioinformatics analysis, revealed that many novel transcripts are over-expressed in either larvae- or post-larvae-stage prawn, shedding light on the molecular basis underlying M. rosenbergii metamorphosis. Fast larval molting rates and periodic morphological changes were reflected in over-expression of transcripts annotated to the cell cycle, DNA replication and morphogenic pathways (i.e., Hedgehog and Wnt). Further characterization of transcripts assigned to morphogenic pathways by real-time RT-PCR reconfirmed their over-expression in larvae, albeit with a more complex expression pattern when examined in the individual developmental stages. The expression level of an orthologue of cytochrome P450, 15A1, known to epoxidize methyl farnesoate in insects, was increased in the late larval and early post-larval stages, in accordance with the role of methyl farnesoate in crustacean metamorphosis. This study exemplifies the applicability of a high-throughput sequencing approach for studying complex traits, including metamorphosis, providing new insight into this unexplored area of crustacean research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23372848 PMCID: PMC3555924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Most prominent GO terms assigned to the M. rosebergii developmental transcriptome.
The most prominent GO terms assigned to level 2 of biological processes (top) and levels 2 and 3 of molecular functions (middle) and cellular components (bottom) are listed, as calculated by Blast2GO software suite. A small fraction of 161 GO terms (∼1.4%) are assigned to developmental processes.
Number of transcripts differentially represented in the M. rosenbergii developmental transcriptomic database.
| Number of transcripts | ||
| Fold-change ≥2 | Fold-change ≥2 | Stage |
| 3,704 | 1,939 | Larvae |
| 1,281 | 697 | Post-larvae |
| 2.89 | 2.78 | Ratio (Larva/Post-larvae) |
Figure 2Volcano plot of transcript expression differences between larval and post-larval prawns.
The magnitude of the difference in gene expression between larval and post-larval M. rosenbergii is shown on the X-axis on a log2 scale (post-larval/larval) of intensity (with minimum 2-fold change). The significance of the difference is given as the -log10 (P-value) obtained from a t test (with a minimum P-value = 0.05). The mass of transcripts that are slightly over-represented in larvae (2–8-fold) are circled. Dashed lines represent the border of 8-fold change in larvae (-8 and left) and post-larvae (8 and right).
Figure 3Representative pathways enriched in larvae or relative to metamorphosis.
Cell cycle (A) and DNA replication (B) pathways, Hedgehog (C) and Wnt (D) signaling pathways all have higher representation in larvae than in PLs, while in the insect hormone synthesis pathway (E), the expression pattern is more ambiguous. KO terms present in KEGG pathways but absent in the M. rosenbergii developmental transcriptome are highlighted in purple. KO terms with ≥2-fold over-expression in larvae are in green, and in pale green when the ratio falls between 1.5 and 2. Yellow denotes KO terms found in our transcriptome showing no differential representation between larvae and PLs. Red denotes KO terms with ≥2-fold over-expression in PLs, changing to pink when the ratio falls between 1.5 and 2. Blue denotes ambiguous expression between larvae and PLs. Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways include Patched receptor (Ptc), Wnt5 and Frizzled, whose encoding transcripts were validated using real-time RT-PCR (C and D).
Number of KO terms assigned to differentially represented transcripts in the M. rosenbergii developmental transcriptomic database.
| Number of KO terms | ||||
| Unique | Total | |||
| Fold-change ≥2 | Fold-change ≥2 | Fold-change ≥2 | Fold-change ≥2 | Stage |
| 807 | 534 | 1,172 | 726 | Larvae |
| 114 | 76 | 250 | 154 | Post-larvae |
| 7.08 | 7.03 | 4.69 | 4.71 | Ratio (Larva/Post-larvae) |
Figure 4Relative transcript levels of key metamorphosis-related genes.
Relative transcript levels of Mr-Patched, Mr-Wnt5, Mr-Fz and Mr-CYP15A1 were quantified via real-time RT-PCR in larvae and PLs (n = 18 in each group). Different letters represent significant differences, while error bars represent SEM. Comparison of relative Mr-Patched (A), Mr-Wnt5 (B) and Mr-Fz (C) transcript levels in larvae and PLs reveals a highly significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, P-value <0.01), supporting the ratio of ∼20 (Mr-Patched) and ∼2 (Mr-Wnt5 and Mr-Fz) in favor of the larval group compared with PLs, as calculated by the RPM ratio obtained with the transcriptome. Comparison of relative Mr-CYP15A1 (D) transcript levels in larvae and PLs also reveals a highly significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, P-value <0.01), supporting the higher expression levels expected in PLs, as calculated by the RPM ratio obtained with the transcriptome. However, when dividing the larval and PL groups into defined stages (Zoea 4, 7–8, 10–11, PL3, 15, 22), the overall trend is more complex, with significantly higher Mr-Patched transcript levels seen in Zoea 4, and 7–8, as compared with PL15 and PL22 and also in Zoea 10–11, as compared with PL22 (A'; Kruskal-Wallis test: H (df = 5, N = 36) = 24.06317, P-value <0.05), significantly higher Mr-Wnt5 transcript levels seen in Zoea 4, 7–8 and PL3, as compared with PL22 (B'; Kruskal-Wallis test: H (df = 5, N = 36) = 28.50751, P-value <0.01), significantly higher Mr-Fz transcript levels in Zoea 7–8, as compared with PL22 (C'; Kruskal-Wallis test: H (df = 5, N = 36) = 14.48048, P-value <0.02) and significantly higher Mr-CYP15A1 transcript levels in PL3, as compared with Zoea 4 and Zoea 7–8 (D'; Kruskal-Wallis test: H (df = 5, N = 36) = 17.66032, P-value <0.05).