BACKGROUND: Defining dispersal of influenza virus via aerosol is essential for the development of prevention measures. METHODS: During the 2010-2011 influenza season, subjects with influenza-like illness were enrolled in an emergency department and throughout a tertiary care hospital, nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained, and symptom severity, treatment, and medical history were recorded. Quantitative impaction air samples were taken not ≤0.305 m (1 foot), 0.914 m (3 feet), and 1.829 m (6 feet) from the patient's head during routine care. Influenza virus was detected by rapid test and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 94 subjects (65%) tested positive for influenza virus. Twenty-six patients (43%) released influenza virus into room air, with 5 (19%) emitting up to 32 times more virus than others. Emitters surpassed the airborne 50% human infectious dose of influenza virus at all sample locations. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were exposed to mainly small influenza virus particles (diameter, <4.7 µm), with concentrations decreasing with increasing distance from the patient's head (P < .05). Influenza virus release was associated with high viral loads in nasopharyngeal samples (shedding), coughing, and sneezing (P < .05). Patients who reported severe illness and major interference with daily life also emitted more influenza virus (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs within 1.829 m of patients with influenza could be exposed to infectious doses of influenza virus, primarily in small-particle aerosols. This finding questions the current paradigm of localized droplet transmission during non-aerosol-generating procedures.
BACKGROUND: Defining dispersal of influenza virus via aerosol is essential for the development of prevention measures. METHODS: During the 2010-2011 influenza season, subjects with influenza-like illness were enrolled in an emergency department and throughout a tertiary care hospital, nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained, and symptom severity, treatment, and medical history were recorded. Quantitative impaction air samples were taken not ≤0.305 m (1 foot), 0.914 m (3 feet), and 1.829 m (6 feet) from the patient's head during routine care. Influenza virus was detected by rapid test and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 94 subjects (65%) tested positive for influenza virus. Twenty-six patients (43%) released influenza virus into room air, with 5 (19%) emitting up to 32 times more virus than others. Emitters surpassed the airborne 50% human infectious dose of influenza virus at all sample locations. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were exposed to mainly small influenza virus particles (diameter, <4.7 µm), with concentrations decreasing with increasing distance from the patient's head (P < .05). Influenza virus release was associated with high viral loads in nasopharyngeal samples (shedding), coughing, and sneezing (P < .05). Patients who reported severe illness and major interference with daily life also emitted more influenza virus (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs within 1.829 m of patients with influenza could be exposed to infectious doses of influenza virus, primarily in small-particle aerosols. This finding questions the current paradigm of localized droplet transmission during non-aerosol-generating procedures.
Authors: John P Thomas; Anand Srinivasan; Chandu S Wickramarachchi; Parveen K Dhesi; Yat Ma Hung; Ajay V Kamath Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Francoise M Blachere; William G Lindsley; Cynthia M McMillen; Donald H Beezhold; Edward M Fisher; Ronald E Shaffer; John D Noti Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Dennis K M Ip; Lincoln L H Lau; Nancy H L Leung; Vicky J Fang; Kwok-Hung Chan; Daniel K W Chu; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris; Timothy M Uyeki; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Benjamin D Anderson; Mengmeng Ma; Yao Xia; Tao Wang; Bo Shu; John A Lednicky; Mai-Juan Ma; Jiahai Lu; Gregory C Gray Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 5.226