Literature DB >> 23371011

Risk of complications after a peptic ulcer diagnosis: effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors.

Sonia Hernández-Díaz1, Elisa Martín-Merino, Luis A García Rodríguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the prevention of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC; bleeding or perforation) in patients with uncomplicated peptic ulcer (PU). We assessed the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in a non-randomized setting. To maximize exchangeability of exposed and unexposed groups we restricted the study to patients with a new diagnosis of PU, i.e., a clear indication. To minimize selection bias we mimicked an intention to treat approach by assessing the effect of PPI prescription after PU diagnosis.
METHODS: Within a population of subjects aged 40-84 years from The Health Improvement Network database, 1997-2006, we identified 3,850 patients with incident PU. Among them, we confirmed 74 first UGIC episodes during a mean follow-up of 4 years. Exposure was prescription coverage during the month following PU diagnosis. We performed a nested case-control analysis and compared UGIC cases with 400 controls matched for age, sex, year and duration of follow-up. Relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of UGIC was 4.6 cases/1,000 person-years; it was highest during the months after PU diagnosis, increased with age, and it was higher in men and subjects with Helicobacter pylori infection, anemia, and alcohol use at PU diagnosis. The RR for UGIC associated with PPI prescriptions during the month after PU diagnosis was 0.56 (95 % CI 0.31-1.0). The RR for NSAIDs with and without a PPI was 1.72 (0.68-4.45) and 3.27 (0.85-12.67), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that prescription of PPIs after a PU diagnosis is associated with a reduced risk of UGIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371011     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2561-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  22 in total

1.  Feasibility study and methodology to create a quality-evaluated database of primary care data.

Authors:  Alison Bourke; Hassy Dattani; Michael Robinson
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2004

2.  Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding/perforation in the general population: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Positive predictive value of computerized medical records for uncomplicated and complicated upper gastrointestinal ulcer.

Authors:  Andrea V Margulis; Luis A García Rodríguez; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Smoking and alcohol intake as risk factors for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  I B Andersen; T Jørgensen; O Bonnevie; M Grønbaek; T I Sørensen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group.

Authors:  N D Yeomans; Z Tulassay; L Juhász; I Rácz; J M Howard; C J van Rensburg; A J Swannell; C J Hawkey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management (OMNIUM) Study Group.

Authors:  C J Hawkey; J A Karrasch; L Szczepañski; D G Walker; A Barkun; A J Swannell; N D Yeomans
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.

Authors:  Wayne A Ray
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; L Jaakkimainen; C Bombardier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Elena Pallari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-29

2.  Risk factors associated with uncomplicated peptic ulcer and changes in medication use after diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio González-Pérez; María E Sáez; Saga Johansson; Péter Nagy; Luis A García Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Risk of uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease in a cohort of new users of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Ana Ruigómez; Saga Johansson; Péter Nagy; Mar Martín-Pérez; Luis A García Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  High Dose versus Low Dose Intravenous Pantoprazole in Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Abdol Rahim Masjedizadeh; Eskandar Hajiani; Pezhman Alavinejad; Seyed Jalal Hashemi; Ali Akbar Shayesteh; Noordin Jamshidian
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2014-07

5.  The Effects of Methanolic Extract of Melissa officinalis on Experimental Gastric Ulcers in Rats.

Authors:  Arezoo Saberi; Elham Abbasloo; Gholamreza Sepehri; Mahnaz Yazdanpanah; Ehsan Mirkamandari; Vahid Sheibani; Zohreh Safi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 0.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.