Literature DB >> 19623573

Positive predictive value of computerized medical records for uncomplicated and complicated upper gastrointestinal ulcer.

Andrea V Margulis1, Luis A García Rodríguez, Sonia Hernández-Díaz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computerized databases can be an efficient resource to study the epidemiology of peptic ulcer (PU) and upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC) if we achieve a high positive predictive value (PPV) of outcome definitions. We assessed the PPV of diagnosis codes in THIN, a primary-care medical-record database, to ascertain individuals with uncomplicated PU, and to identify UGIC and Helicobacter pylori infection status (HPIS) among these patients.
METHODS: We identified: (1) patients with codes suggesting a first episode of uncomplicated PU; (2) episodes of UGIC among them. The computerized profiles with free-text comments of these individuals were reviewed and classified as definite, possible, or excluded cases. Dates and HPIS were also ascertained. For a sample of definite and possible PU, and for all UGIC cases, primary care physicians were sent a questionnaire for confirmation.
RESULTS: The 5296 individuals with codes suggesting PU were classified as definite (49%), possible (25%), and excluded (26%) cases. The PPV for definite/possible PU was 94% (99% for definite, 84% for possible cases). Of the questionnaires with information on HPIS (62%), the PPV and NPV were 100%. The 97 individuals with codes suggesting UGIC were classified as definite (48%), possible (27%), and excluded (22%) cases; the PPV for definite/possible was 95% (100% for definite, 88% for possible cases). Code dates were generally later than medical-record dates.
CONCLUSION: The identification of PU cases and their HPIS and UGIC requires careful review of the computerized clinical information with free-text comments. The validation of a sample is needed to confirm the accuracy of the diagnoses. 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19623573     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  17 in total

1.  Validity of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) for the study of psoriasis.

Authors:  N M Seminara; K Abuabara; D B Shin; S M Langan; S E Kimmel; D Margolis; A B Troxel; J M Gelfand
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Temporal and within practice variability in the health improvement network.

Authors:  Kevin Haynes; Warren B Bilker; Tom R Tenhave; Brian L Strom; James D Lewis
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Case validation in research using large databases.

Authors:  Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Ana Ruigómez
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The Role of Hemoglobin Laboratory Test Results for the Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes Resulting from the Use of Medications in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Elisabetta Patorno; Joshua J Gagne; Christine Y Lu; Kevin Haynes; Andrew T Sterrett; Jason Roy; Xingmei Wang; Marsha A Raebel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Informatics and machine learning to define the phenotype.

Authors:  Anna Okula Basile; Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Risk of bleeding events among patients with systemic sclerosis and the general population in the UK: a large population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Michel; Antonio González-Pérez; María E Sáez; Luis A García Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Risk of complications after a peptic ulcer diagnosis: effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Elisa Martín-Merino; Luis A García Rodríguez
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Authors:  Nicole Gray Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Can primary care data be used to monitor regional smoking prevalence? An analysis of The Health Improvement Network primary care data.

Authors:  Tessa E Langley; Lisa C Szatkowski; Stephen Wythe; Sarah A Lewis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Statins and risk of diabetes: an analysis of electronic medical records to evaluate possible bias due to differential survival.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Luis A García Rodríguez; Oscar Fernandez Cantero; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.