Literature DB >> 23370969

A positive interaction between inhibitors of protein synthesis and cefepime in the fight against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

B Guignard1, J Vouillamoz, M Giddey, P Moreillon.   

Abstract

Quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) synergizes with cefepime for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Here, we studied whether the synergism was restricted to MRSA and if it extended to non-beta-lactam cell wall inhibitors or to other inhibitors of protein synthesis. Three MRSA and two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains were tested, including an isogenic pair of mecA (-)/mecA (+) S. aureus Newman. The drug interactions were determined by fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices and population analysis profiles. The antibacterial drugs that we used included beta-lactam (cefepime) and non-beta-lactam cell wall inhibitors (D-cycloserine, fosfomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin), inhibitors of protein synthesis (Q-D, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, linezolid, fusidic acid), and polynucleotide inhibitors (cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin). The addition of each protein inhibitor to cefepime was synergistic (FIC ≤ 0.5) or additive (FIC > 0.5 but < 1) against MRSA, but mostly indifferent against MSSA (FIC ≥ 1 but ≤ 4). This segregation was not observed after adding cotrimoxazole or ciprofloxacin to cefepime. Population analysis profiles were performed on plates in the presence of increasing concentrations of the cell wall inhibitors plus 0.25 × minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Q-D. Cefepime combined with Q-D was synergistic against MRSA, but D-cycloserine and glycopeptides were not. Thus, the synergism was specific to beta-lactam antibiotics. Moreover, the synergism was not lost against fem mutants, indicating that it acted at another level. The restriction of the beneficial effect to MRSA suggests that the functionality of penicillin-binding protein 2A (PBP2A) was affected, either directly or indirectly. Further studies are necessary in order to provide a mechanism for this positive interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23370969     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-013-1824-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  34 in total

Review 1.  FemABX peptidyl transferases: a link between branched-chain cell wall peptide formation and beta-lactam resistance in gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  S Rohrer; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Cell envelope stress response in Gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Sina Jordan; Matthew I Hutchings; Thorsten Mascher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 3.  Molecular basis and phenotype of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and insights into new beta-lactams that meet the challenge.

Authors:  Leticia I Llarrull; Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Unusual spread of a penicillin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in a geographic area of low incidence.

Authors:  D S Blanc; C Petignat; P Moreillon; J M Entenza; M Eisenring; H Kleiber; A Wenger; N Troillet; C Blanc; P Francioli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  The impact of penicillinase on cefamandole treatment and prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y A Que; J M Entenza; P Francioli; P Moreillon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Involvement of multiple genetic determinants in high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Murakami; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Heiman F L Wertheim; Damian C Melles; Margreet C Vos; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh; Jan L Nouwen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 8.  Molecular aspects of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H de Lencastre; B L de Jonge; P R Matthews; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the response of Staphylococcus aureus to cell-wall-active antibiotics reveals a cell-wall-stress stimulon.

Authors:  S Utaida; P M Dunman; D Macapagal; E Murphy; S J Projan; V K Singh; R K Jayaswal; B J Wilkinson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Introduction of the mec element (methicillin resistance) into Staphylococcus aureus alters in vitro functional activities of fibrinogen and fibronectin adhesins.

Authors:  P E Vaudaux; V Monzillo; P Francois; D P Lew; T J Foster; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jennifer Fishovitz; Juan A Hermoso; Mayland Chang; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 2.  Glycosyltransferases and Transpeptidases/Penicillin-Binding Proteins: Valuable Targets for New Antibacterials.

Authors:  Eric Sauvage; Mohammed Terrak
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.