BACKGROUND: Black dialysis patients have significantly lower mortality compared with white patients, in contradistinction to the higher mortality seen in blacks in the general population. It is unclear whether a similar paradox exists in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), and if it does, what its underlying reasons are. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 518,406 white and 52,402 black male US veterans with non-dialysis-dependent CKD stages 3-5. PREDICTOR: Black race. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: We examined overall and CKD stage-specific all-cause mortality using parametric survival models. The effect of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and laboratory characteristics on the observed differences was explored in multivariable models. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 172,093 patients died (mortality rate, 71.0 [95% CI, 70.6-71.3] per 1,000 patient-years). Black race was associated with significantly lower crude mortality (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97; P < 0.001). The survival advantage was attenuated after adjustment for age (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.16), but was magnified after full multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.70-0.73; P < 0.001). The unadjusted survival advantage of blacks was more prominent in those with more advanced stages of CKD, but CKD stage-specific differences were attenuated by multivariable adjustment. LIMITATIONS: Exclusively male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with CKD have lower mortality compared with white patients. The survival advantage seen in blacks is accentuated in patients with more advanced stages of CKD, which may be explained by changes in case-mix and laboratory characteristics occurring during the course of kidney disease. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Black dialysis patients have significantly lower mortality compared with white patients, in contradistinction to the higher mortality seen in blacks in the general population. It is unclear whether a similar paradox exists in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), and if it does, what its underlying reasons are. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 518,406 white and 52,402 black male US veterans with non-dialysis-dependent CKD stages 3-5. PREDICTOR: Black race. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: We examined overall and CKD stage-specific all-cause mortality using parametric survival models. The effect of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and laboratory characteristics on the observed differences was explored in multivariable models. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 172,093 patients died (mortality rate, 71.0 [95% CI, 70.6-71.3] per 1,000 patient-years). Black race was associated with significantly lower crude mortality (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97; P < 0.001). The survival advantage was attenuated after adjustment for age (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.16), but was magnified after full multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.70-0.73; P < 0.001). The unadjusted survival advantage of blacks was more prominent in those with more advanced stages of CKD, but CKD stage-specific differences were attenuated by multivariable adjustment. LIMITATIONS: Exclusively male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with CKD have lower mortality compared with white patients. The survival advantage seen in blacks is accentuated in patients with more advanced stages of CKD, which may be explained by changes in case-mix and laboratory characteristics occurring during the course of kidney disease. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
Authors: Barry I Freedman; Jeffrey B Kopp; Carl D Langefeld; Giulio Genovese; David J Friedman; George W Nelson; Cheryl A Winkler; Donald W Bowden; Martin R Pollak Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andy I Choi; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Peter Bacchetti; Daniel Bertenthal; German T Hernandez; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Am J Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Jun Ling Lu; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Jennie Z Ma; L Darryl Quarles; Csaba P Kovesdy Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Faraz S Ahmad; Xuan Cai; Katherine Kunkel; Ana C Ricardo; James P Lash; Dominic S Raj; Jiang He; Amanda H Anderson; Matthew J Budoff; Julie A Wright Nunes; Jason Roy; Jackson T Wright; Alan S Go; Martin G St John Sutton; John W Kusek; Tamara Isakova; Myles Wolf; Martin G Keane Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Lijun Ma; Carl D Langefeld; Mary E Comeau; Jason A Bonomo; Michael V Rocco; John M Burkart; Jasmin Divers; Nicholette D Palmer; Pamela J Hicks; Donald W Bowden; Janice P Lea; Jenna O Krisher; Margo J Clay; Barry I Freedman Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jenna M Norton; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Paul W Eggers; Andrew S Narva; Robert A Star; Paul L Kimmel; Griffin P Rodgers Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Lin Li; Wei Ling Lau; Connie M Rhee; Kevin Harley; Csaba P Kovesdy; John J Sim; Steve Jacobsen; Anthony Chang; Jaime Landman; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Kim Peterson; Johanna Anderson; Erin Boundy; Lauren Ferguson; Ellen McCleery; Kallie Waldrip Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jonathan Suarez; Jordana B Cohen; Vishnu Potluri; Wei Yang; David E Kaplan; Marina Serper; Siddharth P Shah; Peter Philip Reese Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Csaba P Kovesdy; Keith C Norris; L Ebony Boulware; Jun L Lu; Jennie Z Ma; Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James P Lash; Ana C Ricardo; Jason Roy; Rajat Deo; Michael Fischer; John Flack; Jiang He; Martin Keane; Claudia Lora; Akinlolu Ojo; Mahboob Rahman; Susan Steigerwalt; Kaixiang Tao; Myles Wolf; Jackson T Wright; Alan S Go Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 8.860