| Literature DB >> 23368533 |
Paulin Nyadjeu1, Elvine Pami Nguelefack-Mbuyo, Albert Donatien Atsamo, Telesphore Benoît Nguelefack, Alain Bertrand Dongmo, Albert Kamanyi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous study showed that the aqueous extract of the stem bark of Cinnamomum zeylanicum possesses antihypertensive and vasodilatory properties. The present work investigates the acute and chronic antihypertensive effects of the methanol extract of Cinnamomum zeylanicum stem bark (MECZ) in L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23368533 PMCID: PMC3572416 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Effect of the methanol extract from stem bark on the mean arterial blood pressure in L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n=5); αp<0.05, βp<0.01 and γp<0.001 significantly different compared to the initial value (0 minute). **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 significantly different compared to the value 20 minutes after L-NAME administration.
Figure 2Effects of the methanol extract of on MABP and heart rate (B). Values are Mean±SEM (n=5); βp<0.01 compared to the control group; **p<0.01 and ***p<0.01 compared to the L-NAME group.
Figure 3Effects of chronic treatment on the rat relative body weight. n=5; **p<0.01 significantly different compared to the control.
Figure 4Effects of the chronic treatment on the aorta, heart and left ventricle relative weight. Values are Mean±SEM (n=5); γp<0.001 significantly different compared to the control group; **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 significantly different compared to the L-NAME group.
Figure 5Representative photographs showing aortic and left ventricular histomorphologies respectively stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin and Van Gieson trichrome. Magnification: 400X.
Figure 6Effects of the chronic treatment on aorta and cardiac NO content. Values are Mean±SEM (n=5); βp<0.01 significantly different compared to the control group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 significantly different compared to the L-NAME group.
Effects of the methanol extract from on lipid profile in L-NAME hypertensive rats
| Control | 53.48 ± 3.36 | 50.63 ± 2.07 | 48.76 ± 3.13 | 5.51 ± 3.68 | 1.06 ± 0.31 |
| L-NAME | 81.10 ± 3.80β | 83.13 ± 4.02γ | 17.57 ± 2.82β | 38.52 ± 4.29β | 5.35 ± 0.48γ |
| L-N + Capto | 45.74 ± 3.36** | 48.12 ± 2.09*** | 40.40 ± 3.32** | 4.50 ± 3.96*** | 1.50 ± 0.70*** |
| L-N + MECZ | 50.16 ± 3.33* | 56.46 ± 5.29*** | 42.26 ± 3.83** | 9.50 ± 3.08*** | 1.41 ± 0.18*** |
n = 5; βp < 0.01 and γp < 0.001 significantly different compared to the control; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 significantly different compared to L-NAME. L-NAME group received only L-NAME 40 mg/kg/day. L-N + Capto received L-NAME plus captopril (20 mg/kg/day) while L-N + MECZ received L-NAME plus extract (300 mg/kg/day).