| Literature DB >> 23365791 |
Yan-Yun Yang1, Liang Xu, Song-Yao Hao, Yan Li, Zhen-Qiu Zhang.
Abstract
A sensitive HPLC method was developed for the quantitative determination of isoliquiritin apioside (ILA) and isoliquiritin (IL) in rat plasma. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile, chloroform was used to separate lipid-soluble impurities from the plasma samples and remove acetonitrile. A chromatography was carried out on Diamonsil C18 (150 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm) analytical column, using a mobile phase consisting of water (containing phosphoric acid 0.1%, v/v); acetonitrile (72 : 28, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The wavelength-switching technology was performed to determine ILA and IL at 360 nm and wogonoside (internal standard, IS) at 276 nm. The calibration curves of ILA and IL were fairly linear over the concentration ranges of 0.060-3.84 μg/mL (r = 0.9954) and 0.075-4.80 μg/mL (r = 0.9968), respectively. The average extract recoveries of ILA, IL, and IS were all over 80%. The precision and accuracy for all concentrations of quality controls and standards were within 15%. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.060 μg/mL for ILA and 0.075 μg/mL for IL. The method was used in pharmacokinetic study after an oral administration of Zhigancao extract to rats.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23365791 PMCID: PMC3540785 DOI: 10.1155/2012/364013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Isoliquiritin apioside (a) and isoliquiritin (b).
Figure 2Typical HPLC chromatograms of the analytes in rat plasma (1, ILA; 2, IL; 3, IS). (a) Chromatogram of blank plasma; (b) chromatogram of plasma sample at LLOQ level (ILA 0.060 g/mL and IL 0.075 g/mL); (c) chromatogram of plasma sample at middle QC level (ILA 0.48 g/mL and IL 0.60 g/mL); (d) chromatogram of plasma sample obtained from rat (No. 2) at 1 h after an oral administration of Zhigancao extract (ILA 0.78 g/mL and IL 1.04 g/mL by calculation).
Intraday and interday precision and accuracy for QC samples.
| Analyte | Spiked concentration | Measured concentration | Intraday ( | Measured concentration | Interday ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | RSD (%) | RE (%) | ( | RSD (%) | RE (%) | |
| ILA | 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 6.2 | −3.6 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 9.0 | 0.4 |
| 0.48 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 5.6 | −3.4 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 7.0 | −0.8 | |
| 3.07 | 3.08 ± 0.16 | 5.4 | 0.2 | 3.02 ± 0.16 | 4.8 | 0.7 | |
|
| |||||||
| IL | 0.15 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 9.7 | −2.3 |
| 0.6 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 6.8 | 1.0 | |
| 3.84 | 3.78 ± 0.24 | 5.0 | −1.7 | 3.73 ± 0.18 | 3.5 | −2.7 | |
(Inter-day) RSD , (Inter-day) RSD .
Stability of ILA and IL under various conditions in plasma (n = 3).
| Analyte |
Spiked concentration | Stored at room temperature for 12 h | Three freeze-thaw stability | Stored at −20°C for 15 days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | RE (%) | Measured | RE (%) | Measured | RE (%) | ||
| ILA | 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.001 | 2.7 | 0.12 ± 0.003 | −0.5 | 0.12 ± 0.002 | −0.5 |
| 0.48 | 0.48 ± 0.008 | −3.6 | 0.45 ± 0.018 | −5.6 | 0.48 ± 0.002 | 0.07 | |
| 3.07 | 3.07 ± 0.028 | 0.03 | 2.91 ± 0.029 | −5.2 | 2.97 ± 0.006 | −3.2 | |
|
| |||||||
| IL | 0.15 | 0.16 ± 0.005 | 4.3 | 0.16 ± 0.006 | 3.9 | 0.15 ± 0.004 | −2.6 |
| 0.6 | 0.59 ± 0.015 | −1.1 | 0.62 ± 0.019 | 2.7 | 0.57 ± 0.010 | −4.4 | |
| 3.84 | 3.82 ± 0.065 | −0.4 | 3.85 ± 0.077 | 0.19 | 3.72 ± 0.157 | −3.2 | |
Figure 3Mean plasma concentration-time profiles (n = 6) after an oral administration of Zhigancao extract.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of ILA and IL in following an oral administration of Zhigancao extract. The C max was the measured maximal concentration of ILA and IL, and the t max was the time to reach maximal concentration of ILA and IL, obtained directly from the observed value. Plasma concentrations in the terminal phase for each subject were fit to a log-linear regression by the method of least squares to obtain the elimination rate constant (k ). The t 1/2 value was calculated with the following formula: t 1/2 = ln(2)/k . The AUC0– value was the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 36 h (calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule), and AUC0– value was calculated using the formula: AUC0– = AUC0– + C last/k , where C last was the last measurable concentration. The mean residence time (MRT) was obtained from the formula AUMC/AUC (AUMC-area under the concentration × time curve), and MRT0– was calculated using the formula: MRT0– = AUMC0–/AUC0–.
| Parameter | ILA | IL |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.88 ± 0.34 | 1.45 ± 0.47 |
|
| 2.08 ± 2.11 | 1.92 ± 2.06 |
|
| 8.12 ± 1.72 | 8.56 ± 1.17 |
| AUC0– | 8.93 ± 3.06 | 15.39 ± 3.91 |
| AUC0– | 9.49 ± 3.35 | 16.20 ± 4.23 |
| MRT0– | 11.17 ± 2.72 | 11.53 ± 1.66 |
| MRT0– | 12.27 ± 4.35 | 13.20 ± 2.34 |