| Literature DB >> 23365694 |
Genevieve E Martin1, Maelenn Gouillou, Anna C Hearps, Thomas A Angelovich, Allen C Cheng, Fiona Lynch, Wan-Jung Cheng, Geza Paukovics, Clovis S Palmer, Richard M Novak, Anthony Jaworowski, Alan L Landay, Suzanne M Crowe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with immune dysfunction and the related development of conditions with an inflammatory pathogenesis. Some of these immune changes are also observed in HIV infection, but the interaction between immune changes with aging and HIV infection are unknown. Whilst sex differences in innate immunity are recognized, little research into innate immune aging has been performed on women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23365694 PMCID: PMC3554695 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparison of demographic variables between HIV positive and HIV negative groups.
| HIV negative | HIV positive |
| |
| N | 53 | 23 | - |
| Median age (range) years | 47 (20–82) | 40 (20–63) | 0.069 |
| Median BMI (range) | 23.8 (18.0–42.0) | 30.6 (19.4–43.9) |
|
| Viral load (copies/mL) | |||
| – Detectable viral load, >50 copies/mL (n (%)) | - | 8 (34.8) | - |
| – Median viral load (range) | - | 2256 (208–1.28×106) | - |
| CD4 count (cells/µL) | |||
| – Median CD4+ T cell count (range) | - | 433 (4–1433) | - |
| – Median nadir CD4+ T cell count (range) | - | 123 (1–688) | - |
| Hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive (n(%)) | - | 6 (27.3) | - |
| On cART (n (%)) | - | 20 (87.0) | - |
median and range shown of those patients with detectable viral load.
HCV status unknown for 1 patient.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; cART, combination antiretroviral therapy.
Continuous variables were compared using the Students t test or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. p values<0.05 were considered significant.
Linear regression analyses to examine the relationship of each parameter with age and the impact of HIV infection on this relationship.
|
|
| ||||||
| Parameter | n | Coefficient | 95% CI |
| Coefficient | 95% CI |
|
| Monocyte subsets | |||||||
| - % of monocytes that are CD16+ | 76 | 0.59 | 0.12, 1.06 |
| −10.55 | −18.38, −2.73 |
|
| Plasma markers | |||||||
| - sCD163 | 75 | 0.01 | 0.01, 0.02 |
| −14.47 | −22.71, −6.23 |
|
| - sCD14 | 65 | 0.00 | −0.00, 0.01 | 0.373 | −11.13 | −20.58, −1.68 |
|
| - LPS | 71 | −4.66 | −18.63, 9.31 | 0.508 | −6.60 | −14.66, 1.46 | 0.107 |
| - CXCL10 | 76 | 0.17 | 0.09, 0.25 |
| 2.20 | −11.23, 15.64 | 0.745 |
| - Difference in slopes | −0.15 | −0.24, −0.06 |
| - | - |
| |
| - HIV positive | 23 | 0.02 | −0.00, 0.05 | 0.056 | - | - |
|
| - HIV negative | 53 | 0.17 | 0.08, 0.26 |
| - | - |
|
| - Neopterin | 73 | 1.05 | −1.27, 3.38 | 0.369 | −9.60 | −18.21, −0.99 |
|
| Lymphocyte subset | |||||||
| - CD28−CD57+ | 75 | 0.26 | 0.02, 0.50 |
| −12.62 | −21.57, −3.66 |
|
Bivariable regression analyses shown are performed on combined HIV negative and HIV positive participants with age as an outcome, adjusting for HIV status. An interaction model whereby each group had its own slope for the parameter value over age (stratified by HIV status) was compared to a model of common slope (non-stratified model) using the likelihood ratio test and the model of best fit is shown.
p value that the slope of the line is non-zero.
p value that the intercept of the line is different for HIV positive and HIV negative.
One outlier was excluded from this analysis.
The model with the best fit for CXCL10 was stratified by HIV status and as such the slopes for HIV negative and HIV positive groups are different and are shown separately.
This term describes the difference in slope between the HIV positive and HIV negative models. The p value indicates that the slopes are significantly different.
Note. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 1Bivariable linear regression of plasma CXCL10 and the proportion of CD16+ monocytes.
A comparison of the slopes between HIV negative (open circles, dashed line; n = 53) and HIV positive (closed circles, solid line; n = 23) groups and the relationship with age for (a) % CD16+ monocytes determined by whole-blood flow cytometry, (b) plasma CXCL10 and (c) sCD163 levels determined by ELISA.
Multivariable linear regression model.
| Parameter | Coefficient | 95% CI | p value |
| CXCL10 | 0.18 | 0.10, 0.25 |
|
| – Difference in slopes | −0.18 | −0.26, −0.10 |
|
| – HIV positive | 0.00 | −0.02, 0.03 | 0.771 |
| – HIV negative | 0.18 | 0.08, 0.25 |
|
| sCD163 | 0.01 | 0.00, 0.02 |
|
| CD28+CD57− CD8+ T cells | −1.12 | −1.74, −0.49 |
|
| Total CD28− CD8+ T cells | −1.01 | −1.65, −0.36 |
|
| HIV status | 0.04 | −12.36, 12.45 | 0.995 |
| Constant | 122.33 | 64.60, 180.28 |
|
Combinations of parameters identified as significant in bivariable modeling were included in multivariable linear regression models, with stepwise elimination of variables that were not statistically significant in the model. n = 74, Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 585.15, R = 0.40.
The model with the best fit for CXCL10 was stratified by HIV status and as such the slopes for HIV positive and HIV negative groups are different and are shown separately.
This term describes the difference in slope between the HIV positive and HIV negative models. The p value indicates that the slopes are significantly different.
Note. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.