| Literature DB >> 23365614 |
Abstract
The overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of endothelial damage in diabetes. To assess the effect of oat on experimental diabetic retinopathy, five groups of Albino rats were studied: nondiabetic control, untreated diabetic, and diabetic rats treated with 5%, 10%, and 20% (W/W) oat of the diet for 12 weeks. Novel data were obtained in this study indicating a protective role of oat against oxidative stress and diabetic retinopathy. The effects of oat on parameters of oxidative stress, AGE, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) were assessed by ELISA and NF-κB activation by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were also determined. After 12 weeks of diabetes, oat treatment reduced blood glucose levels, HbA1c, all oxidative stress markers, CML, normalized NF-κB activation and TNFα expression. Furthermore it reduced VEGF in the diabetic retina by 43% (P < 0.001). In conclusion, oat modulates microvascular damage through normalized pathways downstream of ROS overproduction and reduction of NF-κB and its controlled genes activation, which may provide additional endothelial protection.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23365614 PMCID: PMC3556423 DOI: 10.1155/2013/983923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Initial and final body weights, blood biochemical, and physiological parameters of the rats.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight, g | 195.13 ± 9.5 | 196.44 ± 7 | 194.19 ± 6 | 197 ± 7.2 | 196.33 ± 6.5 |
| Final body weight, g | 265.5 ± 8.2 | 161.8 ± 7.2a | 203.13 ± 16.5a,b | 215.52 ± 8.9a,b | 234 ± 12.3a,b |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 92.78 ± 0.45 | 265.35 ± 1.45a | 115.92 ± 1.4a,b | 106.71 ± 1.23b | 96.21 ± 0.57a,b |
| HbA1c, % | 5.24 ± 0.41 | 9.42 ± 0.34a | 7.88 ± 0.54 b | 6.85 ± 0.38 b | 6.88 ± 0.52 b |
| Albumin, g/L | 38.4 ± 5.7 | 38.2 ± 7.7 | 38.5 ± 6.5 | 38.7 ± 7.5 | 38.9 ± 8.1 |
| Total protein, g/L | 76 ± 7 | 62 ± 6.5a | 63.2 ± 6.5a | 65.6 ± 7.1 | 69.91 ± 7.5b |
| GSH, mmol/L | 0.281 ± 0.015 | 0.105 ± 0.03a | 0.116 ± 0.02a | 0.145 ± 0.021a,b | 0.172 ± 0.02a,b |
| Catalase, U/gHb | 94.54 ± 14 | 50.98 ± 15a | 62.13 ± 13a,b | 70.11 ± 11a,b | 86.55 ± 12b |
| Glutathione reductase, U/gHb | 4.25 ± 0.09 | 2.25 ± 0.62a | 2.31 ± 0.71a,b | 2.54 ± 0.54a,b | 3.21 ± 0.94b |
| Glutathione peroxidase, U/gHb | 57.1 ± 11 | 145.5 ± 45a | 129 ± 11.1a,b | 89.54 ± 10.2b | 69.9 ± 9.55b |
Data are expressed as the means ± SD. Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic untreated and groups 3–5: diabetic rats treated with 5, 10, and 20% (W/W) oat in the diet, respectively. Each group consisted of 10 animals.
a P < 0.05 versus normal control group, b P < 0.05 versus diabetic untreated group.
Oxidant/antioxidant parameters as well as concentration of CML in the rat retina.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA, nmol/mg protein | 2.45 ± 0.16 | 4.75 ± 0.17a | 3.98 ± 0.52a,b | 3.15 ± 0.25 a | 2.95 ± 0.15b |
| GST, nmol substrat·mg protein−1·min−1 | 176 ± 31 | 82 ± 13a | 105 ± 17a,b | 125 ± 11a,b | 151 ± 9a,b |
| GSH-Px, nmol substrat·mg protein−1·min−1 | 0.92 ± 0.17 | 0.34 ± 0.09a | 0.55 ± 0.1a,b | 0.67 ± 0.15 a,b | 0.82 ± 0.165b |
| Catalase, IU·mg protein−1 | 2.61 ± 0.032 | 0.52 ± 0.03a | 0.56 ± 0.02a | 0.96 ± 0.04a,b | 1.45 ± 0.21a,b |
| SOD, nmol substrat·mg protein−1·min−1 | 3.53 ± 0.45 | 1.82 ± 0.35a | 1.92 ± 0.5a | 2.3 ± 0.6a | 2.95 ± 0.75b |
| GSH, nmol/mg protein | 16 ± 3 | 16.11 ± 2 | 16.1 ± 2.1 | 15.95 ± 2 | 16 ± 2.3 |
| CML, pg/mg protein | 3.54 ± 0.22 | 8.81 ± 0.34a | 5.42 ± 0.35a,b | 3.85 ± 0.55b | 3.2 ± 0.6b |
Data are expressed as the means ± SD. Group 1: normal control; group 2: diabetic untreated group; groups 3–5: diabetic groups treated with 5, 10, and 20% (W/W) oat in the diet, respectively. Each group consisted of 10 animals.
a P < 0.05 versus normal control group, b P < 0.05 versus diabetic untreated group.
Figure 1Retinal VEGF levels assessed at 12 weeks of oat treatment. VEGF was significantly higher in the diabetic untreated group than in the normal control group. Oat treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of the elevated VEGF levels. Data are mean ± SE (n = 10 retinas/group), *P < 0.01 versus normal control, and **P < 0.01 versus diabetic untreated group.
Figure 2Retinal TNFα levels assessed at 12 weeks of oat treatment. TNFα was markedly elevated in the diabetic untreated group than in the normal control group. Tretment of rats with oat resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of the elevated TNFα levels. Data are mean ± SE (n = 10 retinas/group), *P < 0.01 versus normal control, and **P < 0.03 versus diabetic untreated group.
Figure 3Histopathological findings in the retina. A photomicrography representing H&E sections from different studies groups (A: diabetic group, B–D: diabetic rats treated with 5, 10 and 20% oat in the diet (W/W) respectively, and E: Control group) (200x).
Figure 4EMSA for NF-κB for total retinal extract. Compared with the normal group, the diabetic untreated group shows markedly increased NF-κB expression and the oat-treated groups show a dose-dependent decreased expression.