| Literature DB >> 23365611 |
James Oluwagbamigbe Fajemiroye1, José Luís Rodrigues Martins, Paulo César Ghedini, Pablinny Morreira Galdino, Joelma Abadia Marciano de Paula, José Realino de Paula, Fabio Fagundes Da Rocha, Elson Alves Costa.
Abstract
Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus popularly referred to as craveiro is considered as a calming agent in different local preparations. The present study attempted to examine antidepressant-like effect of dichloromethane fraction (DF) and role of monoamine oxidase (MAO), tryptophan, and tyrosine hydroxylase. Based on the research focus, tail suspension (TS), forced swimming (FS), and open field (OF) tests were conducted after oral administration of DF (125, 250, or 500 mg/Kg). Ex vivo assay of MAO was also conducted to evaluate inhibitory effect of DF (250 mg/Kg). Administration of DF elicits antidepressant-like response in the TS and FS. However, DF 500 mg/Kg did not alter mice performance in these models. The data obtained in the OF showed a reduction in total crossing and rearing activity; these effects suggest motor interference in TS and FS performance. Mice pretreatment with p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA) (100 mg/kg, i.p.-serotonin biosynthesis inhibitor) for 4 consecutive days or acute administration of α-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT) (100 mg/kg, i.p.-catecholamine synthesis inhibitor) blocked anti-immobility effect of DF in the FS. In ex vivo assay of MAO, DF did not inhibit catabolic activity of MAO. Our findings support antidepressant-like activity of DF and suggest an effect that depends on monoamine biosynthesis.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23365611 PMCID: PMC3556429 DOI: 10.1155/2013/659391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram showing (a) oleanolic acid peak detected in dichloromethane fraction of Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus and (b) reference drug (oleanolic acid, Sigma).
Figure 2The effect of dichloromethane fraction (DF), imipramine (IMI), or vehicle administration on the immobility (a) in the TS; (b) FS. Data are presented as mean of immobility time in seconds ± S.E.M. (n = 10). All differences from the control group are considered to be significant at P < 0.05, or P < 0.01 as denoted by ∗ or ∗∗, respectively. Except for control group, lack of symbol ∗ on the bar indicates P > 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of dichloromethane fraction (DF), diazepam (DZP), or vehicle oral treatments in the open-field test. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 10 ± 2).
Figure 4The effect of dichloromethane fraction (DF), imipramine (IMI), or vehicle administration on the immobility after pretreatment with (a) PCPA 100 mg/kg; (b) AMPT 100 mg/kg in FS. Data are presented as mean of immobility time in seconds ± S.E.M. (n = 10 ± 2). All differences from the control group are considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or P < 0.01 as denoted by ∗ or ∗∗, respectively, while # (P < 0.05) or ### (0.001) represents reversion of anti-immobility effect by PCPA or AMPT pretreatments. Except for control group, lack of symbol ∗ or # on the bar indicates P > 0.05.