OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D intake may prevent physical performance decline through prevention of muscle mass loss. Our objective was to determine whether low dietary intakes were associated with low muscle mass (MM). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of 1989 community-dwelling women (mean age 80.5±3.8years) from the EPIDémiologie de l'OStéoporose (EPIDOS) study were assessed at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Low intakes of vitamin D (<70µg/week) were estimated from the weekly dietary vitamin D intakes (self-administered food frequency questionnaire). Low MM was defined according to the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index assessed using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, divided by square height of less than 5.45 kg/m2. Usual gait speed defined physical performance. Age, sun exposure, co-morbidities, education level, living arrangements, recreational physical activity, dietary protein and calcium intakes, bone mineral density, handgrip strength, and body mass index were considered as potential confounders. Multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed the association between low vitamin D intakes and low MM. RESULTS: Two-hundred and nine (10.5%) women with low MM were compared to 1,780 women with normal MM. In final model, obesity/overweight (Adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR=0.09; 95%CI [0.05-0.17]), malnutrition (aOR=3.90; 95%CI [2.74-5.54]) and low handgrip strength (aOR=2.33; 95%CI [1.44-3.77]; p<0.001) were statistically associated with a low MM status. CONCLUSION: No association with low MM has been reported regarding low dietary intakes of vitamin D.
OBJECTIVES:Vitamin D intake may prevent physical performance decline through prevention of muscle mass loss. Our objective was to determine whether low dietary intakes were associated with low muscle mass (MM). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of 1989 community-dwelling women (mean age 80.5±3.8years) from the EPIDémiologie de l'OStéoporose (EPIDOS) study were assessed at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Low intakes of vitamin D (<70µg/week) were estimated from the weekly dietary vitamin D intakes (self-administered food frequency questionnaire). Low MM was defined according to the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index assessed using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, divided by square height of less than 5.45 kg/m2. Usual gait speed defined physical performance. Age, sun exposure, co-morbidities, education level, living arrangements, recreational physical activity, dietary protein and calcium intakes, bone mineral density, handgrip strength, and body mass index were considered as potential confounders. Multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed the association between low vitamin D intakes and low MM. RESULTS: Two-hundred and nine (10.5%) women with low MM were compared to 1,780 women with normal MM. In final model, obesity/overweight (Adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR=0.09; 95%CI [0.05-0.17]), malnutrition (aOR=3.90; 95%CI [2.74-5.54]) and low handgrip strength (aOR=2.33; 95%CI [1.44-3.77]; p<0.001) were statistically associated with a low MM status. CONCLUSION: No association with low MM has been reported regarding low dietary intakes of vitamin D.
Authors: Sabine M P Verschueren; An Bogaerts; Christophe Delecluse; Albrecht L Claessens; Patrick Haentjens; Dirk Vanderschueren; Steven Boonen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Thomas Dietrich; Bess Dawson-Hughes Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Larissa German; C Kahana; V Rosenfeld; I Zabrowsky; Z Wiezer; D Fraser; D R Shahar Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Denise K Houston; Janet A Tooze; Dorothy B Hausman; Mary Ann Johnson; Barbara J Nicklas; Michael E Miller; Rebecca H Neiberg; Anthony P Marsh; Anne B Newman; Steven N Blair; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: F Landi; R Calvani; M Tosato; A M Martone; A Picca; E Ortolani; G Savera; S Salini; M Ramaschi; R Bernabei; E Marzetti Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: G Pabst; A-K Zimmermann; C Huth; W Koenig; T Ludwig; A Zierer; A Peters; B Thorand Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ru Wang; Markku Alen; Zhusheng Yu; Petri Wiklund; Shu Mei Cheng; Timo Törmäkangas; Peijie Chen; Sulin Cheng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christian M Girgis; Kuan Minn Cha; Benjamin So; Michael Tsang; Jennifer Chen; Peter J Houweling; Aaron Schindeler; Rebecca Stokes; Michael M Swarbrick; Frances J Evesson; Sandra T Cooper; Jenny E Gunton Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 12.910