Literature DB >> 23363807

Publicly funded clinical trials and the future of cancer care.

Richard L Schilsky1.   

Abstract

Publicly sponsored trials, conducted primarily by cooperative groups sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, and commercially sponsored trials are necessary to create new knowledge, improve the care of oncology patients, and develop new drugs and devices. Commercial sponsors launch clinical trials that will result in drug approval, label extension, expansion of market share, and an increase in shareholder value. Conversely, publicly sponsored trials seek to optimize therapy for a particular disease, create new knowledge, and improve public health; these trials can also result in label extension of a drug and even in initial drug approval. Publicly sponsored trials may combine and/or compare drugs developed by different commercial sponsors, develop multimodality therapies (e.g., the combination of chemotherapy and radiation), or develop novel treatment schedules or routes of drug administration (e.g., intraperitoneal chemotherapy). Publicly sponsored trials are more likely to focus on therapies for rare diseases and to study survivorship and quality of life; these areas may not be a priority for commercial entities. Screening and prevention strategies have been developed almost exclusively by the public sector given the large sample size and long follow-up period needed to complete the trial and, therefore, the lack of short-term commercial gain. Finally, given the public nature of the funding, clinical investigators are expected to publish their results even if the outcomes are unfavorable for the investigational therapy. With the ongoing reorganization of the cooperative groups to form a national clinical trials network, opportunities exist to create a robust platform for biomarker discovery and validation through the expanded collection of well-annotated biospecimens obtained from clinical trial participants. Thus, publicly funded trials are vital to developing and refining new cancer treatments and disseminating results to the medical community and the general public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363807      PMCID: PMC3579608          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  25 in total

1.  Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Arlene A Forastiere; Helmuth Goepfert; Moshe Maor; Thomas F Pajak; Randal Weber; William Morrison; Bonnie Glisson; Andy Trotti; John A Ridge; Clifford Chao; Glen Peters; Ding-Jen Lee; Andrea Leaf; John Ensley; Jay Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  R I Fisher; E R Gaynor; S Dahlberg; M M Oken; T M Grogan; E M Mize; J H Glick; C A Coltman; T P Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13.

Authors:  William P Peters; Gary L Rosner; James J Vredenburgh; Elizabeth J Shpall; Michael Crump; Paul G Richardson; Michael W Schuster; Lawrence B Marks; Constance Cirrincione; Larry Norton; I C Henderson; Richard L Schilsky; David D Hurd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.

Authors:  Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B.

Authors:  Lewis R Silverman; Erin P Demakos; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig; Richard M Stone; Douglas Nelson; Bayard L Powell; Carlos M DeCastro; John Ellerton; Richard A Larson; Charles A Schiffer; James F Holland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Authors:  S P Whitman; K J Archer; L Feng; C Baldus; B Becknell; B D Carlson; A J Carroll; K Mrózek; J W Vardiman; S L George; J E Kolitz; R A Larson; C D Bloomfield; M A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Donna Niedzwiecki; Margarita Lopatin; Xing Ye; Mark Lee; Paula N Friedman; Wendy Frankel; Kim Clark-Langone; Carl Millward; Steven Shak; Richard M Goldberg; Najjia N Mahmoud; Robert S Warren; Richard L Schilsky; Monica M Bertagnolli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin S Hughes; Lauren A Schnaper; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Beryl McCormick; Brenda Shank; Judith Wheeler; Lorraine A Champion; Thomas J Smith; Barbara L Smith; Charles Shapiro; Hyman B Muss; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis; William Wood; David Sugarbaker; I Craig Henderson; Larry Norton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cancer clinical trials--do we need a new algorithm in the age of stratified medicine?

Authors:  James H Doroshow; Stefan Sleijfer; Roger Stupp; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-06

2.  Off-label use of anticancer drugs in eastern Switzerland: a population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  M Joerger; C Schaer-Thuer; D Koeberle; K Matter-Walstra; J Gibbons-Marsico; S Diem; B Thuerlimann; T Cerny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Cartographic Mapping and Travel Burden to Assess and Develop Strategies to Improve Minority Access to National Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Deborah Watkins Bruner; Stephanie L Pugh; Katherine A Yeager; Jesse Bruner; Walter Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Caitlin C Murphy; David E Gerber; Ann M Geiger; Ethan Halm; Rasmi G Nair; John V Cox; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette S Skinner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.178

5.  Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Lisa M McShane; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 50.717

6.  Comparative costs and activity from a sample of UK clinical trials units.

Authors:  Daniel Hind; Barnaby C Reeves; Sarah Bathers; Christopher Bray; Andrea Corkhill; Christopher Hayward; Lynda Harper; Vicky Napp; John Norrie; Chris Speed; Liz Tremain; Nicola Keat; Mike Bradburn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Diana Merino Vega; Lola Fashoyin-Aje; Suparna Wedam; Gwynn Ison; Sol Atienza; Peter De Porre; Tithi Biswas; Jamie N Holloway; David S Hong; Madison M Wempe; Richard L Schilsky; Edward S Kim; James L Wade
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Impact of investigator initiated trials and industry sponsored trials on medical practice (IMPACT): rationale and study design.

Authors:  E Nury; K Bischoff; K Wollmann; K Nitschke; S Lohner; M Schumacher; G Rücker; A Blümle
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.