Literature DB >> 23362842

Energy expenditure and sex differences of golf playing.

Stefan C Zunzer1, Serge P von Duvillard, Gerhard Tschakert, Brent Mangus, Peter Hofmann.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the average physical intensity and energy expenditure during a single round of golf on hilly and flat courses in a heterogeneous group of healthy men and women of varying age and golf handicap. Forty-two males and 24 females completed an incremental cycle-ergometer exercise test to determine exercise performance markers. The heart rate (HR), duration, distance, walking speed, ascent and descent were measured via a global positioning system (GPS)/HR monitor during the game and energy expenditure was calculated. Playing 9 or 18-holes of golf, independent of the golf course design, the average HR was not significantly different between sexes or the subgroups. The intensities were light with respect to the percentage of maximal HR and metabolic equivalents of task (METs). Total energy expenditure of all participants was not significantly different for hilly (834 ± 344 kcal) vs. flat courses (833 ± 295 kcal) whereas male players expended significantly greater energy than female players (926 ± 292 vs. 556 ± 180 kcal), but did not have significantly greater relative energy expenditure (2.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.7 METs). As a high volume physical activity, playing golf is suggested to yield health benefits. Since the intensity was well below recommended limits, golf may have health related benefits unrelated to the intensity level of the activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23362842     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.764465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  8 in total

1.  Golf and Physical Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Graeme G Sorbie; Alexander J Beaumont; Ashley K Williams; David Lavallee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 2.  Upper Body Injuries in Golfers.

Authors:  Andrew Creighton; Jennifer Cheng; Joel Press
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 3.  Competitive Golf: How Longer Courses Are Changing Athletes and Their Approach to the Game.

Authors:  Matthew Zoffer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Energy Cost of Lower Body Dressing, Pop-Over Transfers, and Manual Wheelchair Propulsion in People with Paraplegia Due to Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Meaghan M Lynch; Zachary McCormick; Brian Liem; Geneva Jacobs; Peter Hwang; Thomas George Hornby; Leslie Rydberg; Elliot J Roth
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-12

Review 5.  A rapid review to identify physical activity accrued while playing golf.

Authors:  Jack Luscombe; Andrew D Murray; Evan Jenkins; Daryll Archibald
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Acute Physiological Effects of Continuous Versus Intermittent Walking During Golf in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Prakash Jayabalan; Rachel Bergman; Emilio Jauregui; Chad Hanaoka; Aaron M Stoker
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review.

Authors:  A D Murray; L Daines; D Archibald; R A Hawkes; C Schiphorst; P Kelly; L Grant; N Mutrie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Public health considerations regarding golf during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.

Authors:  Patrick Gordon Robinson; Charlie Foster; Andrew Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.