Literature DB >> 2336258

Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response.

M Rosenfield1, B Gilmartin.   

Abstract

Proximal stimuli to accommodation were assessed by comparing the open-loop accommodative responses (AR's) to stimuli placed at viewing distances of 5 m (0.2 D) and 0.33 m (3D) in 10 late-onset myopes (LOM's) and 10 emmetropes. The accommodation and vergence loops were opened by subjects viewing targets monocularly through 0.5-mm pinholes. Pre- and post-task levels of tonic accommodation (TA) were used to assess the accommodative adaptation induced by the task. For the 0.2 D condition there was no significant difference between pre-task TA, within-task AR, or post-task TA, indicating that accommodation was open-loop throughout this distal condition. When viewing the 3 D target both refractive groups exhibited significant increases in AR, emmetropes showing higher levels of proximally induced accommodation (PIA) when compared with LOM's. The data indicate that target proximity will influence AR even when both blur and vergence cues have been stabilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2336258     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199002000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements.

Authors:  B Antona; F Barra; A Barrio; E Gonzalez; I Sanchez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Nearwork-induced transient myopia: a critical review.

Authors:  E Ong; K J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction.

Authors:  Ke Zheng; Tian Han; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Accommodative amplitude using the minus lens at different near distances.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Jason S Ng; Bruno Mario Cesana; Abbas Ali Yekta; Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Comparison of three monocular methods for measuring accommodative stimulus-response curves.

Authors:  Yunyun Chen; Wanqing Jin; Zhili Zheng; Chuanchuan Zhang; Huiling Lin; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Hao Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 7.  Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation.

Authors:  David H Burns; Peter M Allen; David F Edgar; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-07-11

8.  Accommodative Response in Patients with Central Field Loss: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ali Mazyed Alsaqr; Hisham AlShareef; Faisal Alhajri; Ali Abusharha; Raied Fagehi; Ahmad Alharbi; Saud Alanazi
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-09

9.  Comparing measurement techniques of accommodative amplitudes.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; James Kundart; Farshad Askarizadeh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Comparison of the Amplitude of Accommodation Measured Using a New-Generation Closed-Field Autorefractor with Conventional Subjective Methods.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz; Karolina Pluta; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Ramin Khoramnia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.