PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized double blind controlled study was to investigate if the vision of contemporary art video according to the Videoinsight(®) method could produce better short-term clinical and subjective outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS:One-hundred and six patients treated withsingle-bundle ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular tenodesis were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to Group A (53 patients) and Group B (53 patients). Group A received one art video that was established to produce positive and therapeutic "insight", while Group B received one art video with an "insight" unfavourable to the psychological recovery. All patients were instructed to watch the video 3 times a week for the first 2 months during the execution of the same rehabilitative protocol. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery with Tegner, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), physical and mental SF-36 scores and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Time to crutches discharge was collected at final follow-up as well. RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up and 101 patients (Group A: 51 patients; Group B: 50 patients) were available at mean 3.0 ± 0.2 months follow-up. Age at surgery was 33.0 ± 17.0 years. The two groups were homogeneous regarding pre-operative demographic data, meniscal lesions and clinical outcomes. Significant improvements were observed in Group A compared to Group B at final follow-up for subjective IKDC (82.0 ± 13.8 vs. 71.0 ± 19.7, p = 0.0470), TKS (28.1 ± 6.0 vs. 32.0 ± 5.8, p = 0.0141) and time to crutches discharge (20.9 ± 5.0 vs. 26.5 ± 8.2 days, p = 0.0012). A positive significant correlation between TSK and time to crutches discharge (r = 0.35, p = 0.0121) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The Videoinsight(®) method combined to adequate rehabilitation could be an effective tool in order to improve short-term clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized double blind controlled study was to investigate if the vision of contemporary art video according to the Videoinsight(®) method could produce better short-term clinical and subjective outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: One-hundred and six patients treated with single-bundle ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular tenodesis were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to Group A (53 patients) and Group B (53 patients). Group A received one art video that was established to produce positive and therapeutic "insight", while Group B received one art video with an "insight" unfavourable to the psychological recovery. All patients were instructed to watch the video 3 times a week for the first 2 months during the execution of the same rehabilitative protocol. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery with Tegner, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), physical and mental SF-36 scores and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Time to crutches discharge was collected at final follow-up as well. RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up and 101 patients (Group A: 51 patients; Group B: 50 patients) were available at mean 3.0 ± 0.2 months follow-up. Age at surgery was 33.0 ± 17.0 years. The two groups were homogeneous regarding pre-operative demographic data, meniscal lesions and clinical outcomes. Significant improvements were observed in Group A compared to Group B at final follow-up for subjective IKDC (82.0 ± 13.8 vs. 71.0 ± 19.7, p = 0.0470), TKS (28.1 ± 6.0 vs. 32.0 ± 5.8, p = 0.0141) and time to crutches discharge (20.9 ± 5.0 vs. 26.5 ± 8.2 days, p = 0.0012). A positive significant correlation between TSK and time to crutches discharge (r = 0.35, p = 0.0121) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The Videoinsight(®) method combined to adequate rehabilitation could be an effective tool in order to improve short-term clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.
Authors: M Marcacci; S Zaffagnini; F Iacono; M P Neri; I Loreti; A Petitto Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Garrett S Bullock; Timothy C Sell; Ryan Zarega; Charles Reiter; Victoria King; Hailey Wrona; Nilani Mills; Charlotte Ganderton; Steven Duhig; Anu Räisäsen; Leila Ledbetter; Gary S Collins; Joanna Kvist; Stephanie R Filbay Journal: Sports Med Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Ruth L Chimenti; Molly S Pacha; Natalie A Glass; Mathew Frazier; Amy O Bowles; Andrew D Valantine; Kristin R Archer; Jason M Wilken Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2022-02-01
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Jordan A Bley; Laura J Huston; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Hiral Master; Emily K Reinke; Mackenzie L Bird; Erica A Scaramuzza; Christine M Haug; Shannon L Mathis; Susan W Vanston; Charles L Cox; Kurt P Spindler; Kristin R Archer Journal: Phys Ther Sport Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Michael C Obermeier; Robby S Sikka; Marc Tompkins; Bradley J Nelson; Abigail Hamilton; Megan Reams; Terese L Chmielewski Journal: Sports Health Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Hye Chang Rhim; Seo Jun Lee; Jin Sung Jeon; Geun Kim; Kwang Yeol Lee; Jin Hyuck Lee; Ki-Mo Jang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 1.817