Literature DB >> 23361619

Purkinje cell simple spike discharge encodes error signals consistent with a forward internal model.

Laurentiu S Popa1, Angela L Hewitt, Timothy J Ebner.   

Abstract

Processing motor errors is essential for online control of goal-directed movements and motor learning. Evidence from psychophysical and imaging studies supports the long-standing view that error processing is central to cerebellar function. The dominant view is that error-related signals are encoded in the complex spike discharge of Purkinje cells. However, the findings are inconsistent on whether complex spike activity correlates with motor errors. Recently, we examined if simple spike firing carries error signals in monkeys trained to manually track a randomly moving target. The task requires continuous processing of motor errors characterized by the relative movements between the hand-driven cursor and the target center. Linear regression models show that error parameters are robustly represented in the simple spike activity of most Purkinje cells. At the single cell level, the error signals are encoded independently and integrated with kinematic signals. In a large majority of Purkinje cells, correlation strengths between the simple spike discharge and an error parameter have bimodal profiles with respect to time, exhibiting a local maxima corresponding to firing leading the behavior and another one corresponding to firing lagging behavior. The bimodal temporal profiles suggest that individual error parameters are dually encoded as both an internal prediction used for feedback-independent, compensatory movements and the actual sensory feedback used to monitor performance. Approximately 75 % of the dual representations have opposing modulations of the simple spike activity, one increasing firing and the other depressing firing, as reflected by the reversed signs of the regression coefficients corresponding to the local maxima of the R (2) profile. These dual representations of individual parameters with opposing modulation of the simple spike firing are consistent with the signals needed to generate sensory prediction errors used to update an internal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361619      PMCID: PMC3643991          DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0452-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  15 in total

1.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control.

Authors:  D M. Wolpert; R C. Miall
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1996-11

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Maurice A Smith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation.

Authors:  Mollie K Marko; Adrian M Haith; Michelle D Harran; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Internal models for motor control.

Authors:  M Kawato; D Wolpert
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  1998

8.  Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements.

Authors:  S Kitazawa; T Kimura; P B Yin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  What features of limb movements are encoded in the discharge of cerebellar neurons?

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Angela L Hewitt; Laurentiu S Popa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Predictive and feedback performance errors are signaled in the simple spike discharge of individual Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Laurentiu S Popa; Angela L Hewitt; Timothy J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The neuronal code(s) of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Detlef H Heck; Chris I De Zeeuw; Dieter Jaeger; Kamran Khodakhah; Abigail L Person
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Circuit mechanisms underlying motor memory formation in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Ka Hung Lee; Paul J Mathews; Alexander M B Reeves; Katrina Y Choe; Shekib A Jami; Raul E Serrano; Thomas S Otis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Bidirectional learning in upbound and downbound microzones of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Minimizing Precision-Weighted Sensory Prediction Errors via Memory Formation and Switching in Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Youngmin Oh; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  In vivo analysis of Purkinje cell firing properties during postnatal mouse development.

Authors:  Marife Arancillo; Joshua J White; Tao Lin; Trace L Stay; Roy V Sillitoe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Searching for an Internal Representation of Stimulus Kinematics in the Response of Ventral Paraflocculus Purkinje Cells.

Authors:  Pablo M Blazquez; GyuTae Kim; Tatyana A Yakusheva
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Learning to expect the unexpected: rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion.

Authors:  Jessica X Brooks; Jerome Carriot; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  How the credit assignment problems in motor control could be solved after the cerebellum predicts increases in error.

Authors:  Sergio O Verduzco-Flores; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Plasticity of cerebellar Purkinje cells in behavioral training of body balance control.

Authors:  Ray X Lee; Jian-Jia Huang; Chiming Huang; Meng-Li Tsai; Chen-Tung Yen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  The Roles of the Olivocerebellar Pathway in Motor Learning and Motor Control. A Consensus Paper.

Authors:  Eric J Lang; Richard Apps; Fredrik Bengtsson; Nadia L Cerminara; Chris I De Zeeuw; Timothy J Ebner; Detlef H Heck; Dieter Jaeger; Henrik Jörntell; Mitsuo Kawato; Thomas S Otis; Ozgecan Ozyildirim; Laurentiu S Popa; Alexander M B Reeves; Nicolas Schweighofer; Izumi Sugihara; Jianqiang Xiao
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.