Literature DB >> 19525786

Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Nitin Goyal1, David W Wimberley, Adam Hyatt, Steve Zeiller, Alexander R Vaccaro, Alan S Hilibrand, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to document and review the surgical technique and the clinical and radiographic outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although high-grade slips make up a distinct minority of all patients afflicted with spondylolisthesis, approximately 2% in most series, the treatment of this small cohort of patients has been the topic of on going, and often heated debate. Recently, there has been a trend in the literature toward the combination of instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and interbody fusion with or without reduction. Although spine surgeons have used this procedure as a tool to treat patient's with spondylolisthesis of any cause, there is no report in the literature describing the results of neural element decompression, transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) reduction, and instrumented PSF of the listhetic vertebrae in the treatment of high and mid-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: From 1999 to 2003, 13 patients with mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades II, III, or IV) who failed conservative treatment were treated by posterior lumbar decompression, TLIF at the disk space of the level of the slip, instrumented PSF, and reduction of the listhetic vertebrae. Standing lumbar radiographs were taken preoperatively, at the time of the initial postoperative visit and at regular intervals thereafter. Several radiographic parameters were noted including degree of anterolisthesis, slip angle, sacral inclination, and disk height. Statistical comparisons were made with 2-tailed paired t tests.
RESULTS: The average anterolisthesis, normalized to the superior endplate diameter, was 51.0%+/-16.6% preoperatively, 13.2%+/-11.8% immediately postoperative, and 17.0%+/-12.6% at final follow-up (Table 1). Of the 10 patients with sufficient radiographic follow-up, all but one had radiographic evidence of solid bony union at the time of final radiographic examination. Follow-up averaged 21.5 months and ranged from 11 to 48 months.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents a unified approach to the solitary diagnosis of mid and high-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis, adding further information to the growing body of literature for the TLIF procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525786     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318182cdab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  13 in total

1.  An RCT study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes with the use of PLIF or TLIF after instrumented reduction in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Er-Zhu Yang; Jian-Guang Xu; Xiao-Kang Liu; Gen-Yang Jin; Wenzhen Xiao; Bing-Fang Zeng; Xiao-Feng Lian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  A Bourghli; S Aunoble; O Reebye; J C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does the L5 spinal nerve move? Anatomical evaluation with implications for postoperative L5 nerve palsy.

Authors:  Basem Ishak; Shogo Kikuta; Tyler Scullen; Joe Iwanaga; Daniel J Denis; Christopher M Maulucci; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Minimal access bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  N A Quraishi; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of interbody fusion cage on clinical and radiological outcome of surgery in L4-L5 lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Reza Jalilian; Farideh Golhasani-Keshtan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

6.  Retrospective radiographic analysis of anterior lumbar fusion for high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Maziyar A Kalani; Pelagia Kouloumberis; Alexandra E Richards; Mark K Lyons; Victor J Davila; Matthew T Neal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

7.  No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  H S Hagenmaier; Diyar Delawi; Nico Verschoor; F Oner; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  The Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Posterior Approach Spinal Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: The Current Evidence from Prospective Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Chun-Hui Chen; Zhi-Hao Shen; Zhen-Hua Feng; Wan-Qing Weng; Shu-Min Li; Yong-Long Chi; Li-Hui Yin; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Pedicle-Screw-Based Dynamic Systems and Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Biomechanical and Clinical Experiences of Dynamic Fusion with Isobar TTL.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Sabina Champain
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-01-21

10.  Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Atanu Chatterjee; Jeffrey R McConnell; Deepak K Jha; Tapas Chakraburtty
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.