Kristy Osgood1, Jonathan Krakoff, Marie Thearle. 1. Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Department of Health and Human Services, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uric acid (UA) is known to be associated with excess adiposity and insulin resistance. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between UA and the factors associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), both initially and longitudinally. METHODS: Serum UA was assessed as a potential determinant of concurrent blood pressure, serum lipids, glucose regulation measured via an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), acute insulin response (AIR), and insulin action (M) measured with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in 245 participants (72% Native American, 56% male). UA was also assessed as a predictor of the above variables in 60 participants with follow-up data available (median follow-up time=11.2 years [interquartile range (IQR)=8.1, 13.6 years]. The impact of UA on the risk of T2DM was determined as 36 of the 245 participants developed T2DM after the baseline visit. RESULTS: UA was negatively associated with both concurrent and future M, such that for every 1 mg/dL increase in serum UA, M decreased 7.6% (P<0.001) and future M decreased 6.3% (P=0.02). However, UA was not associated with AIR (P=0.7). UA concentrations were a predictor of T2DM [hazard risk ratio (HRR)=1.5; P=0.02]. UA was positively associated with both concurrent blood pressure and lipids and also predicted future increases in blood pressure and total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Not only did UA associate with concomitant insulin action, blood pressure, and lipids, it also predicted future declines in insulin action and T2DM. UA is a potential target for preventing decreases in insulin sensitivity and rises in blood pressure and cholesterol.
BACKGROUND:Uric acid (UA) is known to be associated with excess adiposity and insulin resistance. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between UA and the factors associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), both initially and longitudinally. METHODS: Serum UA was assessed as a potential determinant of concurrent blood pressure, serum lipids, glucose regulation measured via an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), acute insulin response (AIR), and insulin action (M) measured with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in 245 participants (72% Native American, 56% male). UA was also assessed as a predictor of the above variables in 60 participants with follow-up data available (median follow-up time=11.2 years [interquartile range (IQR)=8.1, 13.6 years]. The impact of UA on the risk of T2DM was determined as 36 of the 245 participants developed T2DM after the baseline visit. RESULTS:UA was negatively associated with both concurrent and future M, such that for every 1 mg/dL increase in serum UA, M decreased 7.6% (P<0.001) and future M decreased 6.3% (P=0.02). However, UA was not associated with AIR (P=0.7). UA concentrations were a predictor of T2DM [hazard risk ratio (HRR)=1.5; P=0.02]. UA was positively associated with both concurrent blood pressure and lipids and also predicted future increases in blood pressure and total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Not only did UA associate with concomitant insulin action, blood pressure, and lipids, it also predicted future declines in insulin action and T2DM. UA is a potential target for preventing decreases in insulin sensitivity and rises in blood pressure and cholesterol.
Authors: Robert K Naviaux; Jane C Naviaux; Kefeng Li; A Taylor Bright; William A Alaynick; Lin Wang; Asha Baxter; Neil Nathan; Wayne Anderson; Eric Gordon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lara R Dugas; Elin Chorell; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Estelle V Lambert; Guichan Cao; Richard S Cooper; Brian T Layden; Denise Scholten; Tommy Olsson; Amy Luke; Julia H Goedecke Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Alessandro Maloberti; C Giannattasio; M Bombelli; G Desideri; A F G Cicero; M L Muiesan; E A Rosei; M Salvetti; A Ungar; G Rivasi; R Pontremoli; F Viazzi; R Facchetti; C Ferri; B Bernardino; F Galletti; L D'Elia; P Palatini; E Casiglia; V Tikhonoff; C M Barbagallo; P Verdecchia; S Masi; F Mallamaci; M Cirillo; M Rattazzi; P Pauletto; P Cirillo; L Gesualdo; A Mazza; M Volpe; G Tocci; G Iaccarino; P Nazzaro; L Lippa; G Parati; R Dell'Oro; F Quarti-Trevano; G Grassi; A Virdis; C Borghi Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2020-03-10