Kenneth W Witwer1. 1. Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. kwitwer1@jhmi.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Public sharing of scientific data has assumed greater importance in the omics era. Transparency is necessary for confirmation and validation, and multiple examiners aid in extracting maximal value from large data sets. Accordingly, database submission and provision of the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)(3) are required by most journals as a prerequisite for review or acceptance. METHODS: In this study, the level of data submission and MIAME compliance was reviewed for 127 articles that included microarray-based microRNA (miRNA) profiling and were published from July 2011 through April 2012 in the journals that published the largest number of such articles--PLOS ONE, the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, and Oncogene--along with articles from 9 other journals, including Clinical Chemistry, that published smaller numbers of array-based articles. RESULTS: Overall, data submission was reported at publication for <40% of all articles, and almost 75% of articles were MIAME noncompliant. On average, articles that included full data submission scored significantly higher on a quality metric than articles with limited or no data submission, and studies with adequate description of methods disproportionately included larger numbers of experimental repeats. Finally, for several articles that were not MIAME compliant, data reanalysis revealed less than complete support for the published conclusions, in 1 case leading to retraction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings buttress the hypothesis that reluctance to share data is associated with low study quality and suggest that most miRNA array investigations are underpowered and/or potentially compromised by a lack of appropriate reporting and data submission.
BACKGROUND: Public sharing of scientific data has assumed greater importance in the omics era. Transparency is necessary for confirmation and validation, and multiple examiners aid in extracting maximal value from large data sets. Accordingly, database submission and provision of the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)(3) are required by most journals as a prerequisite for review or acceptance. METHODS: In this study, the level of data submission and MIAME compliance was reviewed for 127 articles that included microarray-based microRNA (miRNA) profiling and were published from July 2011 through April 2012 in the journals that published the largest number of such articles--PLOS ONE, the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, and Oncogene--along with articles from 9 other journals, including Clinical Chemistry, that published smaller numbers of array-based articles. RESULTS: Overall, data submission was reported at publication for <40% of all articles, and almost 75% of articles were MIAME noncompliant. On average, articles that included full data submission scored significantly higher on a quality metric than articles with limited or no data submission, and studies with adequate description of methods disproportionately included larger numbers of experimental repeats. Finally, for several articles that were not MIAME compliant, data reanalysis revealed less than complete support for the published conclusions, in 1 case leading to retraction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings buttress the hypothesis that reluctance to share data is associated with low study quality and suggest that most miRNA array investigations are underpowered and/or potentially compromised by a lack of appropriate reporting and data submission.
Authors: A Brazma; P Hingamp; J Quackenbush; G Sherlock; P Spellman; C Stoeckert; J Aach; W Ansorge; C A Ball; H C Causton; T Gaasterland; P Glenisson; F C Holstege; I F Kim; V Markowitz; J C Matese; H Parkinson; A Robinson; U Sarkans; S Schulze-Kremer; J Stewart; R Taylor; J Vilo; M Vingron Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: John P A Ioannidis; David B Allison; Catherine A Ball; Issa Coulibaly; Xiangqin Cui; Aedín C Culhane; Mario Falchi; Cesare Furlanello; Laurence Game; Giuseppe Jurman; Jon Mangion; Tapan Mehta; Michael Nitzberg; Grier P Page; Enrico Petretto; Vera van Noort Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Dauren Biyashev; Dorina Veliceasa; Jacek Topczewski; Jolanta M Topczewska; Igor Mizgirev; Elena Vinokour; Alagarsamy L Reddi; Jonathan D Licht; Sergei Y Revskoy; Olga V Volpert Journal: Blood Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Syreeta L Tilghman; Melyssa R Bratton; H Chris Segar; Elizabeth C Martin; Lyndsay V Rhodes; Meng Li; John A McLachlan; Thomas E Wiese; Kenneth P Nephew; Matthew E Burow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kenneth W Witwer; Edit I Buzás; Lynne T Bemis; Adriana Bora; Cecilia Lässer; Jan Lötvall; Esther N Nolte-'t Hoen; Melissa G Piper; Sarada Sivaraman; Johan Skog; Clotilde Théry; Marca H Wauben; Fred Hochberg Journal: J Extracell Vesicles Date: 2013-05-27
Authors: Baqer A Haider; Alexander S Baras; Matthew N McCall; Joshua A Hertel; Toby C Cornish; Marc K Halushka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 3.240