Literature DB >> 23357931

Telementoring in robotic surgery.

Michael Santomauro1, G Anthony Reina, Sean P Stroup, James O L'Esperance.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of the current concepts regarding telementoring with robotic surgery highlighting recent advances with respect to urological minimally invasive surgery (MIS). RECENT
FINDINGS: As robotic surgery continues to evolve, telementoring will become a viable alternative to traditional on-site surgical proctoring.
SUMMARY: MIS represents one of the most important breakthroughs in medicine over the past few decades. Newcomers to MIS need the guidance of more experienced, 'high volume' mentors to achieve the superior outcomes promised by MIS over conventional techniques.Telementoring, a subset of telemedicine, allows a surgeon at a remote site to offer intraoperative guidance via telecommunication networks. MIS lends itself well to telementoring techniques for several reasons; the primary surgeon performing MIS is working off of video images of the surgical field or images sent to a console. As such, the mentor is seeing the exact same images as the primary surgeon. In this review, we highlight many of the latest technologies in telemedicine, which are applicable to MIS and provide an overview of the pitfalls, which need to be overcome to make telementoring (and eventually telesurgery) a standard tool in the MIS arsenal.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23357931     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835d4cc2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  12 in total

Review 1.  Telemedicine and telerobotics: from science fiction to reality.

Authors:  Chadrick R Evans; Melissa G Medina; Anthony Michael Dwyer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-28

Review 2.  Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: An emerging technology.

Authors:  Etai M Bogen; Knut M Augestad; Hiten Rh Patel; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 3.  Proctorship and mentoring: Its backbone and application in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Glen Denmer Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Lawrence Hc Kim; Kidon Chang; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: remote coaching in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Gennaro Martines; Giovanna Berardi; Arcangelo Picciariello; Giuseppe Trigiante; Antonio Vitiello
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel H Shin; Leonard Dalag; Raed A Azhar; Michael Santomauro; Raj Satkunasivam; Charles Metcalfe; Matthew Dunn; Andre Berger; Hooman Djaladat; Mike Nguyen; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 6.  Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Tim P Briggs; John D Kelly; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Novel training methods for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Sun; Monish Aron; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07

8.  Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Maciej Nowacki; Łukasz Nazarewski; Tomasz Kloskowski; Dominik Tyloch; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Katarzyna Pietkun; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Janusz Tyloch; Samy L Habib; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 9.  Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends.

Authors:  Sotiris Avgousti; Eftychios G Christoforou; Andreas S Panayides; Sotos Voskarides; Cyril Novales; Laurence Nouaille; Constantinos S Pattichis; Pierre Vieyres
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Andrew A Stanley; Thomas Clifford; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.