Literature DB >> 23356778

A probabilistic clustering theory of the organization of visual short-term memory.

A Emin Orhan1, Robert A Jacobs.   

Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that the content of a memory for even a simple display encoded in visual short-term memory (VSTM) can be very complex. VSTM uses organizational processes that make the representation of an item dependent on the feature values of all displayed items as well as on these items' representations. Here, we develop a probabilistic clustering theory (PCT) for modeling the organization of VSTM for simple displays. PCT states that VSTM represents a set of items in terms of a probability distribution over all possible clusterings or partitions of those items. Because PCT considers multiple possible partitions, it can represent an item at multiple granularities or scales simultaneously. Moreover, using standard probabilistic inference, it automatically determines the appropriate partitions for the particular set of items at hand and the probabilities or weights that should be allocated to each partition. A consequence of these properties is that PCT accounts for experimental data that have previously motivated hierarchical models of VSTM, thereby providing an appealing alternative to hierarchical models with prespecified, fixed structures. We explore both an exact implementation of PCT based on Dirichlet process mixture models and approximate implementations based on Bayesian finite mixture models. We show that a previously proposed 2-level hierarchical model can be seen as a special case of PCT with a single cluster. We show how a wide range of previously reported results on the organization of VSTM can be understood in terms of PCT. In particular, we find that, consistent with empirical evidence, PCT predicts biases in estimates of the feature values of individual items and also predicts a novel form of dependence between estimates of the feature values of different items. We qualitatively confirm this last prediction in 3 novel experiments designed to directly measure biases and dependencies in subjects' estimates.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23356778     DOI: 10.1037/a0031541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  18 in total

1.  Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Julie C Helmers; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Neural population coding of multiple stimuli.

Authors:  A Emin Orhan; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory.

Authors:  Dominic Standage; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Bayesian hierarchical grouping: Perceptual grouping as mixture estimation.

Authors:  Vicky Froyen; Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Factorial comparison of working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Edward Awh; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Tracking the relation between gist and item memory over the course of long-term memory consolidation.

Authors:  Tima Zeng; Alexa Tompary; Anna C Schapiro; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Oscillatory brain state predicts variability in working memory.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Mark G Stokes; Lena Walther; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Optimal attentional allocation in the presence of capacity constraints in uncued and cued visual search.

Authors:  Christopher J Bates; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.