| Literature DB >> 23356738 |
Antoinette V Buys1, Mia-Jean Van Rooy, Prashilla Soma, Dirk Van Papendorp, Boguslaw Lipinski, Etheresia Pretorius.
Abstract
Red blood cells (RBCs) are highly deformable and possess a robust membrane that can withstand shear force. Previous research showed that in diabetic patients, there is a changed RBC ultrastructure, where these cells are elongated and twist around spontaneously formed fibrin fibers. These changes may impact erythrocyte function. Ultrastructural analysis of RBCs in inflammatory and degenerative diseases can no longer be ignored and should form a fundamental research tool in clinical studies. Consequently, we investigated the membrane roughness and ultrastructural changes in type 2 diabetes. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to study membrane roughness and we correlate this with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to compare results of both the techniques with the RBCs of healthy individuals. We show that the combined AFM and SEM analyses of RBCs give valuable information about the disease status of patients with diabetes. Effectiveness of treatment regimes on the integrity, cell shape and roughness of RBCs may be tracked, as this cell's health status is crucial to the overall wellness of the diabetic patient.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23356738 PMCID: PMC3599682 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Figure 1SEM micrograph of an RBC from a healthy individual showing the typical morphology. Scale = 1 μm.
Figure 2SEM micrograph of an RBC of a diabetic individual. A) RBC with very smooth membrane twisted around spontaneously formed fibrin fibers; B) RBC showing lengthened ultrastructure. C) RBC showing smooth membrane. Scale = 1 μm.
Macroparameter measurement results from healthy and diabetic erythrocytes
| 7.22 μm ± 0.16 μm | 6.80 μm ± 0.08 μm | 0.028584* | |
| 2.68 μm ± 0.04 μm | 1.48 μm ± 0.11 μm | 2.44057 E-07* | |
| 358.2 nm ± 117.6 nm | 153.9 nm ± 58.6 nm | 0.00296363* |
*All p-values indicated significant difference between two groups.
Roughness measurement results from healthy and diabetic erythrocytes
| 3.099 nm ± 0.499 nm | 1.70 nm ± 0.13 nm | 0.000141* | |
| 4.12 nm ± 0.51 nm | 1.66 nm ± 0.24 nm | 6.42 E-07* | |
| 1.72 nm ± 0.199 nm | 0.82 nm ± 0.11 nm | 0.000304* |
*All p-values indicated significant difference between two groups.
Figure 3A) Control original profile and surface, z scale = 60nm, x and y scale = 1μm, B) Control first order profile and surface, z scale = 40nm, x and y scale = 1μm, C) Control second order profile and surface, z scale = 40nm, x and y scale = 1μm, D) Control third order profile and surface, z scale = 18nm, x and y scale = 1μm, E) Diabetes original profile and surface, z scale = 60nm, x and y scale = 1μm, F) Diabetes first order profile and surface, z scale = 40nm, x and y scale = 1μm, G) Diabetes second order profile and surface, z scale = 40nm, x and y scale = 1μm, H) Diabetes third order profile and surface, z scale = 18nm, x and y scale = 1μm.