| Literature DB >> 23356403 |
Ching-Jen Wang1, Shan-Ling Hsu, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Yi-Chih Sun, Feng-Sheng Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) shows chondroprotective effect in osteoarthritis of the rat knees. However, the ideal number of ESWT is unknown. This study investigated the effects of different numbers of ESWT in osteoarthritis of the knee in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23356403 PMCID: PMC3626641 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1A knee sketch shows the location of shockwave application in A-P (1-A) and lateral view (1-B).
Figure 2Radiographs of the knee at 12 weeks show more advanced osteoarthritis of the knee in groups II and V, and less arthritic changes in groups I, III and IV.
The results of Mankin score and Safranin O stain
| | | | | |
| 1 (1-1) | 10 (9-12) | 1 (0-2) | 3 (2-4) | 10 (8-11) |
| | P1 = 0.0088 | P2 = 1 | P3 = 0.0742 | P4 = 0.0102 |
| | | P5 = 0.0017 | P6 = 0.0038 | P7 = 0.6213 |
| | | | P8 = 0.0705 | P9 = 0.0022 |
| | | | | P10 = 0.0052 |
| | | | | |
| 1 (1-1) | 18.7 (16-20) | 0.7 (0-1) | 1.3 (1-2) | 15 (12-17) |
| | P1 = 0.0056 | P2 = 0.4226 | P3 = 0.4226 | P4 = 0.0117 |
| | | P5 = 0.0036 | P6 = 0.0039 | P7 = 0.1461 |
| | | | P8 = 0.2302 | P9 = 0.0087 |
| P10 = 0.0096 |
Group I: the control; Group II: ACLT + MM; Group III: ACLT + MM + ESWT 1×/week; Group IV: ACLT + MM + ESWT 2×/week; Group V: ACLT + MM + ESWT 3×/week.
ACLT: anterior cruciate ligament transection; MM: medial meniscectomy; ESWT: extracorporeal corporeal shockwave therapy.
P1: Group I vs Group II P2: Group I vs Group III P3: Group I vs Group IV.
P4: Group I vs Group V P5: Group II vs Group III P6: Group II vs Group IV.
P7: Group II vs Group V P8: Group III vs Group IV P9: Group III vs Group V.
P10: Group IV vs Group V.
The P values were obtained using ANOVA and post hoc test with Bonferoni correction among five groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test between two groups.
Figure 3The results of Mankin score and Safranin O stain.
Figure 4Microscopic features of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone in histomorphological examination.
The results of MMP13 and collagen II in articular cartilage
| | | | | |
| 11.2 (9.4-12) | 83.1 (79.5-89.3) | 9.4 (7.8-11.3) | 22.9 (11.8-27.3) | 89.1 (88.5-92.4) |
| | P1 = 0.0008 | P2 = 0.3467 | P3 = 0.1643 | P4 < 0.0001 |
| | | P5 = 0.0005 | P6 = 0.0008 | P7 = 0.1578 |
| | | | P8 = 0.1307 | P9 < 0.0001 |
| | | | | P10 = 0.0027 |
| | | | | |
| 83.7 (80.4-87.5) | 10.4 (7.6-11.7) | 76 (73.7-82.1) | 77.5 (76-83.7) | 12.4 (11.5-14.5) |
| | P1 < 0.0001 | P2 = 0.1142 | P3 = 0.2007 | P4 = 0.0001 |
| | | P5 = 0.0002 | P6 = 0.0001 | P7 = 0.1319 |
| | | | P8 = 0.6280 | P9 = 0.0005 |
| P10 = 0.0003 |
P1: Group I vs Group II P2: Group I vs Group III P3: Group I vs Group IV.
P4: Group I vs Group V P5: Group II vs Group III P6: Group II vs Group IV.
P7: Group II vs Group V P8: Group III vs Group IV P9: Group III vs Group V.
P10: Group IV vs Group V.
The P values were obtained using ANOVA and post hoc test with Bonferoni correction among five groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test between two groups.
Figure 5The results of MMP13 and collagen II in articular cartilage.
Figure 6Microscopic features of MMP13 and collagen II in articular cartilage in immunohistochemical stains.
The results of vWF, VEGF, BMP-2 and osteocalcin in subchondral bone
| | | | | |
| 81.9 (78.9-86.8) | 16.2 (15.4-19.5) | 84.8 (79.7-89.1) | 73.8 (62.9-78.3) | 17.6 (13.1-20.3) |
| | P1 = 0.0001 | P2 = 0.8696 | P3 = 0.1253 | P4 < 0.0001 |
| | | P5 = 0.0012 | P6 = 0.0044 | P7 = 0.9899 |
| | | | P8 = 0.1156 | P9 = 0.0004 |
| | | | | P10 = 0.0022 |
| | | | | |
| 82.8 (79-84.6) | 15.4 (11.2-19.5) | 72.5 (68.6-80.4) | 78.3 (73.8-83.5) | 13.1 (11.3-17.6) |
| | P1 = 0.0001 | P2 = 0.1239 | P3 = 0.3432 | P4 < 0.0001 |
| | | P5 = 0.0003 | P6 = 0.0001 | P7 = 0.6777 |
| | | | P8 = 0.3540 | P9 = 0.0005 |
| | | | | P10 = 0.0001 |
| | | | | |
| 84.4 (77.1-91) | 11.2 (9.4-15.4) | 74.6 (73.1-89.1) | 72.9 (68.3-73.8) | 13.1 (12.4-14.6) |
| | P1 = 0.0008 | P2 = 0.4670 | P3 = 0.0729 | P4 = 0.0026 |
| | | P5 = 0.0027 | P6 < 0.0001 | P7 = 0.5312 |
| | | | P8 = 0.2893 | P9 = 0.0054 |
| | | | | P10 = 0.0002 |
| | | | | |
| 79.6 (69.6-82.2) | 10.5 (9.4-11.2) | 76.7 (76.1-87.8) | 73.8 (62.9-77.3) | 9.1 (8.5-12.4) |
| | P1 = 0.0029 | P2 = 0.6008 | P3 = 0.3741 | P4 = 0.0016 |
| | | P5 = 0.0025 | P6 = 0.0045 | P7 = 0.8010 |
| | | | P8 = 0.2002 | P9 = 0.0014 |
| P10 = 0.0029 |
P1: Group I vs Group II P2: Group I vs Group III P3: Group I vs Group IV.
P4: Group I vs Group V P5: Group II vs Group III P6: Group II vs Group IV.
P7: Group II vs Group V P8: Group III vs Group IV P9: Group III vs Group V.
P10: Group IV vs Group V.
The P values were obtained using ANOVA and post hoc test with Bonferoni correction among five groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test between two groups.
Figure 7The results of vWF, VEGF, BMP-2 and osteocalcin in subchondral bone.
Figure 8Microscopic features of vWF, VEGF. BMP-2 and osteocalcin in subchondral bone in immunohistochemical stains.