OBJECTIVE: Barrett's oesophagus is a precursor lesion of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer that, in the USA, has increased in incidence over 600% during the past 40 years. Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma are much more common among men than among women; this finding is unexplained and most earlier studies lacked sufficient numbers of women to evaluate sex-specific risk factors. We leveraged the power of an international consortium to assess sex-specific relationships between body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference and Barrett's oesophagus. DESIGN: Four case-control studies provided a total of 1102 cases (316 women, 786 men) and 1400 population controls (436 women, 964 men) for analysis. Study-specific estimates, generated using individual participant data, were combined using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Waist circumference was significantly associated with Barrett's oesophagus, even after adjustment for BMI; persons in the highest versus the lowest quartiles of waist circumference had approximately 125% and 275% increases in the odds of Barrett's oesophagus among men and women, respectively (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.65, I(2)=57; OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.47 to 9.56, I(2)=0). In contrast, there was no evidence of a significant association between BMI and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus, with or without adjustment for waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Waist circumference, independent of BMI, was found to be a risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus among both men and women. Future studies examining the biological mechanisms of this association will extend our knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of Barrett's oesophagus.
OBJECTIVE: Barrett's oesophagus is a precursor lesion of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer that, in the USA, has increased in incidence over 600% during the past 40 years. Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma are much more common among men than among women; this finding is unexplained and most earlier studies lacked sufficient numbers of women to evaluate sex-specific risk factors. We leveraged the power of an international consortium to assess sex-specific relationships between body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference and Barrett's oesophagus. DESIGN: Four case-control studies provided a total of 1102 cases (316 women, 786 men) and 1400 population controls (436 women, 964 men) for analysis. Study-specific estimates, generated using individual participant data, were combined using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Waist circumference was significantly associated with Barrett's oesophagus, even after adjustment for BMI; persons in the highest versus the lowest quartiles of waist circumference had approximately 125% and 275% increases in the odds of Barrett's oesophagus among men and women, respectively (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.65, I(2)=57; OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.47 to 9.56, I(2)=0). In contrast, there was no evidence of a significant association between BMI and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus, with or without adjustment for waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Waist circumference, independent of BMI, was found to be a risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus among both men and women. Future studies examining the biological mechanisms of this association will extend our knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of Barrett's oesophagus.
Authors: Zoe R Edelstein; Diana C Farrow; Mary P Bronner; Sheldon N Rosen; Thomas L Vaughan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: P Stattin; A Bylund; S Rinaldi; C Biessy; H Déchaud; U H Stenman; L Egevad; E Riboli; G Hallmans; R Kaaks Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Fouad Yousef; Chris Cardwell; Marie M Cantwell; Karen Galway; Brian T Johnston; Liam Murray Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michael B Cook; Shannon N Wood; Brooks D Cash; Patrick Young; Ruben D Acosta; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nan Hu; Hua Su; Lemin Wang; Chaoyu Wang; Barbara Gherman; Carol Giffen; Cathy Dykes; Veronique Turcotte; Patrick Caron; Chantal Guillemette; Sanford M Dawsey; Christian C Abnet; Paula L Hyland; Philip R Taylor Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Siddharth Singh; Anamay N Sharma; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Navtej S Buttar; Hashem B El-Serag; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: William D Hazelton; Kit Curtius; John M Inadomi; Thomas L Vaughan; Rafael Meza; Joel H Rubenstein; Chin Hur; E Georg Luebeck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jennifer Drahos; Qian Xiao; Harvey A Risch; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet; Lesley A Anderson; Leslie Bernstein; Linda Brown; Wong-Ho Chow; Marilie D Gammon; Farin Kamangar; Linda M Liao; Liam J Murray; Mary H Ward; Weimin Ye; Anna H Wu; Thomas L Vaughan; David C Whiteman; Michael B Cook Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: M B Cook; S Wood; P L Hyland; P Caron; J Drahos; R T Falk; R M Pfeiffer; S M Dawsey; C C Abnet; P R Taylor; C Guillemette; L J Murray; L A Anderson Journal: Andrology Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Nan Li; Jessica Leigh Petrick; Susan Elizabeth Steck; Patrick Terrence Bradshaw; Kathleen Michele McClain; Nicole Michelle Niehoff; Lawrence Stuart Engel; Nicholas James Shaheen; Douglas Allen Corley; Thomas Leonard Vaughan; Marilie Denise Gammon Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Melina Arnold; Amy Colquhoun; Michael B Cook; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman; Isabelle Soerjomataram Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 4.254