Literature DB >> 23352262

Comparison of adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in women versus men with acute coronary syndrome.

Lakshmana K Pendyala1, Rebecca Torguson, Joshua P Loh, Hironori Kitabata, Sa'ar Minha, Salem Badr, Danny Dvir, Israel M Barbash, Lowell F Satler, Augusto D Pichard, Ron Waksman.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown a relation between female gender and adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences in correlates between genders for these long-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Gender differences were evaluated in the clinical outcomes of 6,929 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes from a large, contemporary PCI registry. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up, are reported. Independent correlates of adverse outcomes were identified using multivariate proportional-hazards regression analysis. Women were older (p <0.001); had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (p <0.001), systemic hypertension (p <0.001), chronic renal insufficiency (p = 0.02), peripheral arterial disease (p <0.001), and congestive heart failure (p <0.001); had lower body surface areas (p <0.001); and had higher body mass indexes (p <0.001). Acute coronary syndrome presentation in women tended to be unstable angina pectoris with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III and IV symptoms, whereas men had more acute myocardial infarctions. At 1 year, the unadjusted rates of all-cause mortality (10.7% vs 7.5%, p <0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (16.4% vs 12.7%, p <0.001) were higher in women. There was a stark difference between the genders in independent correlates of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year. Moreover, the traditional correlates did not have the same impact in women as in men. In conclusion, although there are differences in clinical outcomes after PCI for women compared with men, there are different correlates for these adverse outcomes. These gender-based differences should be taken into account when women undergo contemporary PCI.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352262     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Practice Variation Among Hospitals in Revascularization Therapy and Its Association With Procedure-related Mortality.

Authors:  Jarrod E Dalton; David A Zidar; Belinda L Udeh; Manesh R Patel; Jesse D Schold; Neal V Dawson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Impact of gender difference on long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease in patients under statin treatment.

Authors:  Hideki Wada; Manabu Ogita; Katsumi Miyauchi; Jun Shitara; Hirohisa Endo; Shinichiro Doi; Ryo Naito; Hirokazu Konishi; Shuta Tsuboi; Tomotaka Dohi; Takatoshi Kasai; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya Okazaki; Kikuo Isoda; Satoru Suwa; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Women-specific factors to consider in risk, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ronée E Harvey; Kirsten E Coffman; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

4.  The effect of cardiac geometry variation according to sex and race on outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Edward T Ha; Marc Cohen; Theodore J Gaeta; Manish A Parikh; Stephen J Peterson; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2021-07-19

5.  Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chen-Fang Lin; Li-Jiuan Shen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Churn-Shiouh Gau; Fe-Lin Lin Wu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Gender differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: an insight from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Authors:  Yohei Numasawa; Shun Kohsaka; Hiroaki Miyata; Shigetaka Noma; Masahiro Suzuki; Shiro Ishikawa; Iwao Nakamura; Yutaro Nishi; Takahiro Ohki; Koji Negishi; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Determinants of health after hospital discharge: rationale and design of the Vanderbilt Inpatient Cohort Study (VICS).

Authors:  Abby G Meyers; Amanda Salanitro; Kenneth A Wallston; Courtney Cawthon; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Kathryn M Goggins; Corinne M Davis; Russell L Rothman; Liana D Castel; Katharine M Donato; John F Schnelle; Susan P Bell; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Chandra Y Osborn; Frank E Harrell; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Prognostic Differences between Men and Women with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Data from a Brazilian Registry.

Authors:  Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Eduardo Alberto de Castro Roque; Aline Siqueira Bossa; Bruno Biselli; Tatiana de Carvalho Andreucci Torres Leal; Maria Carolina Feres de Almeida Soeiro; Fábio Grunspun Pitta; Carlos V Serrano; Múcio Tavares Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Gender difference in clinical outcomes of the patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaya Guo; Fahui Yin; Chunlei Fan; Zhilu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Gender-specific cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese populations.

Authors:  Juan Long; Fanfang Zeng; Lili Wang; Chen Yi; Qiying Chen; Honglei Zhao
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.