| Literature DB >> 23351977 |
Chioma A Anosike1, Onyechi Obidoa, Lawrence Us Ezeanyika.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some observations and reports show that people with high consumption of Solanum aethiopicum (African garden egg) have relief in arthritic pains and swelling. We aimed at assessing the effect of methanol extract of Solanum aethiopicum in experimentally induced inflammation using leukocyte mobilization and vascular permeability tests in rats and human red blood cell (HRBC) membrane stabilization as studies.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23351977 PMCID: PMC3556049 DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-20-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
Figure 1fruits.
Result of the phytochemical analysis of garden egg extract
| Alkaloid | ++ |
| Glycosides | +++ |
| Steroids | +++ |
| Terpenoids | +++ |
| Flavonoids | +++ |
| Tannins | - |
| Acidic compounds | + |
| Resins | ++ |
| Saponnins | + |
Bioavailability Key
- = not present.
+ = present in low concentration.
++ = present in moderately high concentration.
+++ = present in very high concentration.
Effect of methanol extract of garden egg on agar induced leukocyte mobilization
| Control | | 94.51 ± 7.93 | | 62.75 | 34.75 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Extract | 100 | 72.62 ± 11.45** | 23 ± 2.17 | 61 | 35 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| 200 | 70.25 ± 12.28** | 26 ± 1.58 | 60 | 36 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 1.25 | |
| 400 | 64.00 ± 14.78** | 32 ± 1.58 | 57 | 39 | 1.25 | 1.0 | 1.75 | |
| Indomethacin | 50 | 56.7 5 ± 7.89*** | 40 ± 1.92 | 60.75 | 35 | 1.25 | 1. 5 | 1.5 |
Level of Significance ***= p<0.001, ** = p<0.01, * = p<0.05 Percent inhibition of migration was calculated relative to control.
Effect of methanol extract of garden egg on acetic acid induced vascular permeability test in rats
| Control | | 0.82 ± 0.12 | - |
| Extract | 100 | 0. 65 ± 0.11* | 21 ± 3.39 |
| 200 | 0.59 ± 0.11* | 25 ± 1.92 | |
| 400 | 0.32 ± 0.06** | 60 ± 3.81 | |
| Indomethacin | 50 | 0.26 ± 0.10** | 68 ± 4.08 |
Level of Significance ***= p<0.001, ** = p<0.01, * = p<0.05 Percent inhibition of migration was calculated relative to control.
Effect of extract on heat induced haemolysis of HRBCs
| Control | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | | |
| 0.25 ± 0.04** | 0.4 ± 0.01 | 66.46 ± 2.89 | ||
| 0.28 ± 0.04** | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 65.14 ± 4.58 | ||
| 0.42 ± 0. 07** | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 46.53 ± 2.52 | ||
| 0.42 ± 0.06** | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 61.88 ± 4.51 | ||
| | 0.43 ± 0.09** | 0.38 ± 0.08 | 86.67 ± 3.06 | |
| Indomethacin | 0.05 ± 0.01*** | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 95.32 ± 3.51 | |
Level of Significance ***= p<0.001, ** = p<0.01, * = p<0.05. Percent inhibition of haemolysis was calculated relative to control.
Effect of extract on hypotonicity induced haemolysis of HRBCs
| Control | 0.65 ± 0.11 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | | |
| 0.62 ± 0.1 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 8.8 ± 1.76 | ||
| 0.60 ± 0.12 | 0.07 ± 0.33 | 11.3 ± 4.16 | ||
| 0.48 ± 0.07** | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 40.8 ± 6.75 | ||
| 0.5 ± 0.09** | 0. 35 ± 0.15 | 53.3 ± 4.51 | ||
| | 0.49 ± 0.06** | 0.32 ± 0.21 | 50.8 ± 3.75 | |
| Indomethacin | 0.28 ± 0.02** | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 61.47 ± 5.50 | |
Level of Significance ***= p<0.001, ** = p<0.01, * = p<0.05. Percent inhibition of haemolysis was calculated relative to control.