Literature DB >> 23351912

Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 1: general principles, measures of general health, pain, and patient satisfaction.

Marie Badalamente1, Laureen Coffelt, John Elfar, Glenn Gaston, Warren Hammert, Jerry Huang, Lisa Lattanza, Joy Macdermid, Greg Merrell, David Netscher, Zubin Panthaki, Greg Rafijah, Douglas Trczinski, Brent Graham.   

Abstract

Measurement is a fundamental cornerstone in all aspects of scientific discovery, including clinical research. To be useful, measurement instruments must meet several key criteria, the most important of which are satisfactory reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Part 1 of this article reviews the general concepts of measurement instruments and describes the measurement of general health, pain, and patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23351912      PMCID： PMC5822430          DOI： 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN： 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  28 in total

Review 1.  Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; J N Katz; J G Wright; G Wells; M Boers; V Strand; B Shea
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Sharon A Martino; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

Authors:  C Bombardier; D D Gladman; M B Urowitz; D Caron; C H Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-06

4.  Quality of life and disease-specific functional status following microvascular reconstruction for advanced (T3 and T4) oropharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  D T Netscher; R A Meade; C M Goodman; E L Alford; M G Stewart
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Campbell; J Syrotuik
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Impaired generic health status but perception of good quality of life in survivors of burn injury.

Authors:  Asgjerd Litleré Moi; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Lars Salemark; Astrid Klopsdal Wahl; Berit Rokne Hanestad
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-10

8.  Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings.

Authors:  Amanda C de Williams; Huw Talfryn Oakley Davies; Yasmin Chadury
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life--an introduction.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Age differences in postoperative pain are scale dependent: a comparison of measures of pain intensity and quality in younger and older surgical patients.

Authors:  Lucia Gagliese; Joel Katz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.961
View more
  7 in total

1.  Reliability, validity and critical appraisal of the cross-cultural adapted German version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS-G).

Authors:  A Papen; T Schöttker-Königer; A Schäfer; F Morrison; B Hollinger; K J Burkhart; R Nietschke; A Zimmerer; N Maffulli; F Migliorini; Marco M Schneider
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 2.  How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  Yirong Wang; Malay Sunitha; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.907

3.  Secondary release of the peripheral nerve with autologous fat derivates benefits for functional and sensory recovery.

Authors:  Natalia E Krzesniak; Anna Sarnowska; Anna Figiel-Dabrowska; Katarzyna Osiak; Krystyna Domanska-Janik; Bartłomiej H Noszczyk
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.135

4.  The Importance of Hand Appearance as a Patient-Reported Outcome in Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Sandeep J Sebastin; Shady A Rehim; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

5.  The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.

Authors:  Tae-Sung In; Jin-Hwa Jung; Keun-Jo Kim; Cu-Rie Lee; Kyoung-Sim Jung; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-06-07

6.  Functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments upon nerve repair in adult hands: systematic review of psychometric properties.

Authors:  Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca; Valéria Meireles Carril Elui; Emily Lalone; Natália Claro da Silva; Rafael Inácio Barbosa; Alexandre Márcio Marcolino; Flávia Pessoni Faleiros Macedo Ricci; Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-27

7.  Clinically SUspected ScaPhoid fracturE: treatment with supportive bandage or CasT? 'Study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial' (SUSPECT study).

Authors:  Abigael Cohen; Max Reijman; Gerald A Kraan; Nina M C Mathijssen; Marc A Koopmanschap; Jan A N Verhaar; Sander Mol; Joost W Colaris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.