Literature DB >> 10494494

Comparative study of self-rating pain scales in osteoarthritis patients.

N Bellamy1, J Campbell, J Syrotuik.   

Abstract

Although progress has been made in the clinical metrology of pain in osteoarthritis, much further work remains. The preferred methods of measurement remain debatable. In this longitudinal, open study, a comparison of eight self-rating pain scales has been conducted. A total of 333 patients entered the four-week study after completing a 3-7 day NSAID-free washout period. Patients were assigned to treatment with oxaprozin 1200 mg p.o. once daily with titration permitted between 600 mg and 1800 mg. Rescue analgesia with acetaminophen (paracetamol) 325 mg (maximum 2600 mg) was allowed. At the end of the washout and the treatment period, patients completed eight self-administered pain scales. All pain measures detected clinically important and statistically significant improvements in pain. The pain scales differed in their degree of responsiveness. The Likert and visual analogue scales and their primary variations (continuous chromatic analogue and numerical scales) were more responsive than more complex measures. A positive correlation between initial pain rating and subsequent pain relief was confirmed in this study. We conclude that, while pain is a subjective sensory phenomenon, its perceived severity can be evaluated using a variety of self-administered pain scales, all of which are capable of detecting improvements in health status following effective pharmacological intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10494494     DOI: 10.1185/03007999909113371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  16 in total

Review 1.  Science of assessment.

Authors:  N Bellamy
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Sharon A Martino; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Test Framing Generates a Stability Bias for Predictions of Learning by Causing People to Discount their Learning Beliefs.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Jarrod C Hines; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Electronic data capture using the Womac NRS 3.1 Index (m-Womac): a pilot study of repeated independent remote data capture in OA.

Authors:  Nicholas Bellamy; B Patel; T Davis; S Dennison
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 5.  Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 1: general principles, measures of general health, pain, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Marie Badalamente; Laureen Coffelt; John Elfar; Glenn Gaston; Warren Hammert; Jerry Huang; Lisa Lattanza; Joy Macdermid; Greg Merrell; David Netscher; Zubin Panthaki; Greg Rafijah; Douglas Trczinski; Brent Graham
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 6.  What is the current evidence of the impact on quality of life whilst waiting for management/treatment of orthopaedic/musculoskeletal complaints? A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Joanne Morris; Asterie Twizeyemariya; Karen Grimmer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Comparative pain reduction of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids for knee osteoarthritis: systematic analytic review.

Authors:  S R Smith; B R Deshpande; J E Collins; J N Katz; E Losina
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Comparison of the construct validity and reproducibility of four different types of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Lisanne Renskers; Ron J J C van Uden; Anita M P Huis; Sanne A A Rongen; Steven Teerenstra; Piet L C M van Riel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritic pain: an analytical literature review of the smallest detectable difference, the minimal detectable change, and the minimal clinically important difference on the pain visual analog scale.

Authors:  Melissa E Stauffer; Stephanie D Taylor; Douglas J Watson; Paul M Peloso; Alan Morrison
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2011-05-05

10.  Does the pain-protective GTP cyclohydrolase haplotype significantly alter the pattern or severity of pain in humans with chronic pancreatitis?

Authors:  Mark Lazarev; Janette Lamb; M Michael Barmada; Feng Dai; Michelle A Anderson; Mitchell B Max; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 3.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.