Literature DB >> 23351762

Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.

André Vajgel1, Igor Batista Camargo, Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf, Tiago Menezes de Melo, José Rodrigues Laureano Filho, Ricardo José de Holanda Vasconcellos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to conduct a computational, laboratory-based comparison of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation locking plates with different profiles in Class III atrophic mandibular fractures using 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional finite element models simulating Class III atrophic mandibular fractures were constructed. The models were divided into 4 groups according to plate thickness (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm). Fractures were simulated in left mandibular bodies, and 3 locking screws were used on each side of each fracture for fixation. Bite forces of approximately 63 N were simulated in the incisor and molar regions of the mandibles in finite element models.
RESULTS: The level of compressive strain on the bone around the screw was within the physiological limit. No significant difference was observed in the displacement of bone segments in the fracture region. Von Mises stress was higher during simulated bites in the molar region for plates with thicknesses of 1.0 mm. Plate tension values were below the level required for permanent deformation or fracture in all models. The 2.5-mm-thick plate presented better biomechanical performance than all other plates. The 2.0-mm-thick plate also showed satisfactory results and adequate safety limits.
CONCLUSION: Large-profile (2.0-mm-thick) locking plates showed better biomechanical performance than did 1.0- and 1.5-mm-thick plates and can be considered an alternative reconstruction plate for the treatment of Class III atrophic mandibular fractures.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23351762     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Complications after osteosynthesis of craniofacial fractures-an analysis from the years 2015-2017.

Authors:  Ákos Bicsák; Dietmar Abel; Laurence Tack; Velissarios Smponias; Stefan Hassfeld; Lars Bonitz
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-09-03

2.  Comparison of a 2.0-mm locking system with conventional 2.0- and 2.4-mm systems in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rubens Camino Junior; Rogério Bonfante Moraes; Constantin Landes; João Gualberto C Luz
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Liu; Ying-Ying Fan; Xian-Feng Jiang; Dale A Baur
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Biomechanical investigation of the supraorbital arch - a transient FEA study on the impact of physical blows.

Authors:  Heike Huempfner-Hierl; Andreas Schaller; Thomas Hierl
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.