Literature DB >> 23351507

Starting the clock: defining nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury by time.

Elan Jeremitsky1, R Stephen Smith, Adrian W Ong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus when the designation of nonoperative management (NOM) for splenic injury (BSI) should start. We evaluated NOM success rates based on different time points after admission.
METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was evaluated for BSI for the year 2008. Observations were evaluated by facility, the time to splenectomy, and the volume of BSI admissions.
RESULTS: Of 15,732 BSIs identified, the overall splenectomy salvage rate was 81%. After the 5th hour, the NOM success rate was 95%. Multivariable analysis revealed that higher BSI grades, level 2 centers and community hospitals, and age ≥55 were associated with failed NOM.
CONCLUSIONS: The grade of injury is an important predictor for failure of NOM. If a 5% failure rate is to be considered a benchmark, then the 5-hour time point after admission should be used for the calculation of NOM success rates.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23351507     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Observation Versus Embolization in Patients with Blunt Splenic Injury After Trauma: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Dominique C Olthof; Pieter Joosse; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Philippe P de Rooij; Loek P H Leenen; Klaus W Wendt; Frank W Bloemers; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Giulia Montori; Fausto Catena; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Viktor Reva; Camilla Bing; Miklosh Bala; Paola Fugazzola; Hany Bahouth; Ingo Marzi; George Velmahos; Rao Ivatury; Kjetil Soreide; Tal Horer; Richard Ten Broek; Bruno M Pereira; Gustavo P Fraga; Kenji Inaba; Joseph Kashuk; Neil Parry; Peter T Masiakos; Konstantinos S Mylonas; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Simone Vasilij Benatti; Noel Naidoo; Francesco Salvetti; Stefano Maccatrozzo; Vanni Agnoletti; Emiliano Gamberini; Leonardo Solaini; Antonio Costanzo; Andrea Celotti; Matteo Tomasoni; Vladimir Khokha; Catherine Arvieux; Lena Napolitano; Lauri Handolin; Michele Pisano; Stefano Magnone; David A Spain; Marc de Moya; Kimberly A Davis; Nicola De Angelis; Ari Leppaniemi; Paula Ferrada; Rifat Latifi; David Costa Navarro; Yashuiro Otomo; Raul Coimbra; Ronald V Maier; Frederick Moore; Sandro Rizoli; Boris Sakakushev; Joseph M Galante; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Alain Chichom Mefire; Dieter Weber; Marco Ceresoli; Andrew B Peitzman; Liban Wehlie; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Outcomes Following Blunt Traumatic Splenic Injury Treated with Conservative or Operative Management.

Authors:  Sarah Corn; Jared Reyes; Stephen D Helmer; James M Haan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2019-08-21

4.  Splenectomy proportions are still high in low-grade traumatic splenic injury.

Authors:  Ahmet Korkut Belli; Önder Özcan; Funda Dinç Elibol; Cenk Yazkan; Cem Dönmez; Ethem Acar; Okay Nazlı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 5.  Damage control surgery for splenic trauma: "preserve an organ - preserve a life".

Authors:  Carlos Serna; José Julián Serna; Yaset Caicedo; Natalia Padilla; Linda M Gallego; Alexander Salcedo; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Adolfo González-Hadad; Alberto García; Mario Alain Herrera; Michael W Parra; Carlos A Ordoñez
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2021-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.