BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adult rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons normally express transcripts for five isoforms of the α-subunit of voltage-gated sodium channels: NaV 1.1, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) readily blocks all but NaV 1.8 and 1.9, and pharmacological agents that discriminate among the TTX-sensitive NaV 1-isoforms are scarce. Recently, we used the activity profile of a panel of μ-conotoxins in blocking cloned rodent NaV 1-isoforms expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes to conclude that action potentials of A- and C-fibres in rat sciatic nerve were, respectively, mediated primarily by NaV 1.6 and NaV 1.7. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used three μ-conotoxins, μ-TIIIA, μ-PIIIA and μ-SmIIIA, applied individually and in combinations, to pharmacologically differentiate the TTX-sensitive INa of voltage-clamped neurons acutely dissociated from adult rat DRG. We examined only small and large neurons whose respective INa were >50% and >80% TTX-sensitive. KEY RESULTS: In both small and large neurons, the ability of the toxins to block TTX-sensitive INa was μ-TIIIA < μ-PIIIA < μ-SmIIIA, with the latter blocking ≳90%. Comparison of the toxin-susceptibility profiles of the neuronal INa with recently acquired profiles of rat NaV 1-isoforms, co-expressed with various NaV β-subunits in X. laevis oocytes, were consistent: NaV 1.1, 1.6 and 1.7 could account for all of the TTX-sensitive INa , with NaV 1.1 < NaV 1.6 < NaV 1.7 for small neurons and NaV 1.7 < NaV 1.1 < NaV 1.6 for large neurons. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Combinations of μ-conotoxins can be used to determine the probable NaV 1-isoforms underlying the INa in DRG neurons. Preliminary experiments with sympathetic neurons suggest that this approach is extendable to other neurons.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adult rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons normally express transcripts for five isoforms of the α-subunit of voltage-gated sodium channels: NaV 1.1, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) readily blocks all but NaV 1.8 and 1.9, and pharmacological agents that discriminate among the TTX-sensitive NaV 1-isoforms are scarce. Recently, we used the activity profile of a panel of μ-conotoxins in blocking cloned rodent NaV 1-isoforms expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes to conclude that action potentials of A- and C-fibres in rat sciatic nerve were, respectively, mediated primarily by NaV 1.6 and NaV 1.7. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used three μ-conotoxins, μ-TIIIA, μ-PIIIA and μ-SmIIIA, applied individually and in combinations, to pharmacologically differentiate the TTX-sensitive INa of voltage-clamped neurons acutely dissociated from adult rat DRG. We examined only small and large neurons whose respective INa were >50% and >80% TTX-sensitive. KEY RESULTS: In both small and large neurons, the ability of the toxins to block TTX-sensitive INa was μ-TIIIA < μ-PIIIA < μ-SmIIIA, with the latter blocking ≳90%. Comparison of the toxin-susceptibility profiles of the neuronal INa with recently acquired profiles of ratNaV 1-isoforms, co-expressed with various NaV β-subunits in X. laevis oocytes, were consistent: NaV 1.1, 1.6 and 1.7 could account for all of the TTX-sensitive INa , with NaV 1.1 < NaV 1.6 < NaV 1.7 for small neurons and NaV 1.7 < NaV 1.1 < NaV 1.6 for large neurons. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Combinations of μ-conotoxins can be used to determine the probable NaV 1-isoforms underlying the INa in DRG neurons. Preliminary experiments with sympathetic neurons suggest that this approach is extendable to other neurons.
Authors: Richard J Lewis; Christina I Schroeder; Jenny Ekberg; Katherine J Nielsen; Marion Loughnan; Linda Thomas; Denise A Adams; Roger Drinkwater; David J Adams; Paul F Alewood Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Min-Min Zhang; Brian Fiedler; Brad R Green; Phillip Catlin; Maren Watkins; James E Garrett; Brian J Smith; Doju Yoshikami; Baldomero M Olivera; Grzegorz Bulaj Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2006-03-21 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: K J Shon; B M Olivera; M Watkins; R B Jacobsen; W R Gray; C Z Floresca; L J Cruz; D R Hillyard; A Brink; H Terlau; D Yoshikami Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1998-06-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jami L Saloman; Nicole N Scheff; Lindsey M Snyder; Sarah E Ross; Brian M Davis; Michael S Gold Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Joanna Gajewiak; Layla Azam; Julita Imperial; Aleksandra Walewska; Brad R Green; Pradip K Bandyopadhyay; Shrinivasan Raghuraman; Beatrix Ueberheide; Marshall Bern; H Mimi Zhou; Natali A Minassian; Rebecca H Hagan; Mack Flinspach; Yi Liu; Grzegorz Bulaj; Alan D Wickenden; Baldomero M Olivera; Doju Yoshikami; Min-Min Zhang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Samuel D Robinson; Helena Safavi-Hemami; Shrinivasan Raghuraman; Julita S Imperial; Anthony T Papenfuss; Russell W Teichert; Anthony W Purcell; Baldomero M Olivera; Raymond S Norton Journal: J Proteomics Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 4.044