Literature DB >> 23350580

The uptake and outcome of prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington's disease in the Netherlands (1998-2008).

M C van Rij1, P A M de Koning Gans, M J van Belzen, R A C Roos, J P M Geraedts, M De Rademaeker, E K Bijlsma, C E M de Die-Smulders.   

Abstract

We aimed to study reproductive behaviour of couples opting for prenatal diagnosis (PND) and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease (HD). In the Netherlands, exclusion PND is available for persons at 50% risk, whereas exclusion PGD is not allowed. All 162 couples who underwent PND or PGD for HD between 1998 and 2008 and referrals for exclusion PGD to Belgium were included. Couples' reproductive information was collected until December 2010; 132 couples (81.5%) underwent PND in 262 pregnancies, 54 (33.3%) started PGD, and 25 used both. Sixteen percent of PND couples used exclusion PND and 6% used exclusion PGD. The outcomes were 76.5% of PND couples delivered ≥1 unaffected child(ren) after PND, and 44.4% of PGD couples delivered ≥1 PGD child(ren) (mean 2.5 cycles/couple). Couples opting for PGD secondarily (after a previous pregnancy) had more frequently terminated a pregnancy for HD (87.0%) compared with couples secondarily opting for PND (55.2%; p = 0.015). At-risk or HD expansion carrier males were underrepresented in the group of couples primarily opting for PGD (25%) and overrepresented in the secondary PGD group (64%). We conclude that couples reconsider their choices in every subsequent pregnancy based on their previous experience, personal beliefs and the gender of the at-risk partner.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Huntington's disease; exclusion; exclusion test; pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; prenatal diagnosis; reproductive decision making; uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23350580     DOI: 10.1111/cge.12089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  4 in total

Review 1.  A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Felicity Wadrup; Simon Holden; Rhona MacLeod; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Andrea H Németh; Shan Owens; Sara Pasalodos; Oliver Quarrell; Angus J Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Prenatal testing in Huntington disease: after the test, choices recommence.

Authors:  Hanane Bouchghoul; Stéphane-Françoise Clément; Danièle Vauthier; Cécile Cazeneuve; Sandrine Noel; Marc Dommergues; Delphine Héron; Jacky Nizard; Marcela Gargiulo; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Healthy children without fear: Reproductive options for patients or couples carrying inherited diseases.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Preimplantation genetic testing for Huntington disease: the perspective of one Portuguese center.

Authors:  Diogo Ferreira; Berta Carvalho; Ana P Neto; Joaquina Silva; Ana M Póvoa; Alberto Barros; Filipa Carvalho
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2019-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.