| Literature DB >> 23349798 |
Dong Shi1, Tomoyo Funayama, Yukihiko Mashima, Yoshimasa Takano, Ai Shimizu, Kotaro Yamamoto, MinGe Mengkegale, Akiko Miyazawa, Noriko Yasuda, Takeo Fukuchi, Haruki Abe, Hidenao Ideta, Kohji Nishida, Toru Nakazawa, Julia E Richards, Nobuo Fuse.
Abstract
Although family studies and genome-wide association studies have shown that genetic factors play a role in glaucoma, it has been difficult to identify the specific genetic variants involved. We tested 669 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the region of chromosome 2 that includes the GLC1B glaucoma locus for association with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) in the Japanese population. We performed a two-stage case-control study. The first cohort consisted of 123 POAG cases, 121 NTG cases and 120 controls: the second cohort consisted of 187 POAG cases, 286 NTG cases, and 271 controls. Out of six SNPs showing significant association with POAG in the first round screening, seven SNPs were tested in the second round. Rs678350 in the HK2 gene coding sequence showed significant allelic (p=0.0027 in Stage Two, 2.7XE-4 in meta-analysis) association with POAG, and significant allelic (p=4.7XE-4 in Stage Two, 1.0XE-5 in meta-analysis) association with NTG. Although alleles in the TMEM182 gene did not show significant association with glaucoma in the second round, subjects with the A/A allele in TMEM182 rs869833 showed worse visual field mean deviation (p=0.01). Even though rs2033008 in the NCK2 gene coding sequence did not show significant association in the first round, it had previously shown association with NTG so it was tested for association with NTG in round 2 (p=0.0053 in Stage Two). Immunohistochemistry showed that both HK2 and NCK2 are expressed in the retinal ganglion cell layer. Once multi-testing was taken into account, only HK2 showed significant association with POAG and NTG in Stage Two. Our data also support previous reports of NCK2 association with NTG, and raise questions about what role TMEM182 might play in phenotypic variability. Our data suggest that HK2 may play an important role in NTG in the Japanese population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23349798 PMCID: PMC3551945 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Experimental Study Design.
The study used a first stage of SNP screening in one population to identify SNPs and genes to be tested in a second population through SNP association testing and mutation screening of genes containing SNPs associated with glaucoma. Stage Two tested SNPs for association in a second population and did mutation screening in that second population in genes containing SNPs that showed significant association with POAG or NTG (p<0.01) in Stage One of our study or that had been previously reported to show significant evidence of association [16].
Stage one Test of SNPs in GLC1B-Region Genes for Association with POAG or NTG.
| Genomic Information | POAG | NTG | Control | ||||||
| rs number | Location | Gene Symbol | MAF | Odds ratio (CI) | p value | MAF | Odds ratio (CI) | p value | MAF |
| rs741788 | 2p13 |
| 0.455 | 1.47 (1.02–2.12) | 0.038 | 0.455 | 1.47 (1.02–2.11) | 0.040 | 0.363 |
| rs909177 |
| 0.455 | 1.44 (1.00–2.08) | 0.047 | 0.463 | 1.49 (1.03–2.14) | 0.032 | 0.367 | |
| rs740277 |
| 0.455 | 1.44 (1.00–2.08) | 0.047 | 0.463 | 1.49 (1.03–2.14) | 0.032 | 0.367 | |
| rs678350 | 2p13 |
| 0.333 | 1.50 (1.01–2.23) | 0.043 | 0.371 | 1.77 (1.19–2.62) | 0.004 | 0.250 |
| rs651071 |
| 0.199 | 0.60 (0.40–0.92) | 0.018 | 0.256 | 0.84 (0.56–1.25) | 0.383 | 0.292 | |
| rs1807090 |
| 0.268 | 1.59 (1.03–2.44) | 0.034 | 0.238 | 1.35 (0.87–2.10) | 0.181 | 0.188 | |
| rs1239066 | 2p12 | 0.293 | 3.04 (1.95–4.72) | 0.009 | 0.269 | 1.55 (1.01–2.38) | 0.045 | 0.192 | |
| rs53915 | 2p12-p11.1 |
| 0.199 | 0.64 (0.42–0.98) | 0.039 | 0.260 | 0.91 (0.61–1.36) | 0.641 | 0.279 |
| rs1529385 | 2p11.2 |
| 0.053 | 0.39 (0.20–0.77) | 0.005 | 0.087 | 0.66 (0.37–1.20) | 0.173 | 0.125 |
| rs1053561 | 2p11.2 |
| 0.114 | 0.53 (0.32–0.88) | 0.012 | 0.178 | 0.89 (0.56–1.40) | 0.609 | 0.196 |
| rs1562322 | 2p11.2 |
| 0.321 | 0.88 (0.61–1.29) | 0.520 | 0.256 | 0.64 (0.43–0.95) | 0.027 | 0.349 |
| rs3024831 | 2p12-p11.2 |
| 0.250 | 0.92 (0.61–1.38) | 0.675 | 0.190 | 0.65 (0.42–0.99) | 0.045 | 0.267 |
| rs6875 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.008 | 0.21 (0.05–0.98) | 0.030 | 0.025 | 0.66 (0.23–1.88) | 0.431 | 0.038 |
| rs1982336 |
| 0.008 | 0.23 (0.05–1.05) | 0.027 | 0.029 | 0.75 (0.28–2.05) | 0.576 | 0.038 | |
| rs718159 |
| 0.008 | 0.21 (0.05–0.98) | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.76 (0.28–2.07) | 0.587 | 0.038 | |
| rs222 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.183 | 0.69 (0.44–1.06) | 0.091 | 0.161 | 0.59 (0.38–0.93) | 0.021 | 0.246 |
| rs1530028 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.228 | 0.66 (0.44–0.99) | 0.045 | 0.306 | 0.99 (0.67–1.46) | 0.952 | 0.308 |
| rs1030902 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.225 | 0.65 (0.44–0.98) | 0.039 | 0.314 | 1.03 (0.70–1.51) | 0.892 | 0.308 |
| rs1369482 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.244 | 0.65 (0.43–0.96) | 0.030 | 0.298 | 0.85 (0.58–1.24) | 0.398 | 0.333 |
| rs871656 | 2q12 |
| 0.337 | 0.70 (0.49–1.01) | 0.058 | 0.322 | 0.66 (0.45–0.95) | 0.025 | 0.421 |
| rs878539 | 2q11.2 |
| 0.463 | 1.52 (1.06–2.18) | 0.024 | 0.422 | 1.28 (0.89–1.85) | 0.185 | 0.363 |
| rs869833 | 2q12.1 |
| 0.467 | 1.66 (1.15–2.40) | 0.006 | 0.376 | 1.14 (0.79–1.65) | 0.490 | 0.346 |
| rs960011 |
| 0.415 | 0.57 (0.40–0.82) | 0.001 | 0.512 | 0.85 (0.60–1.21) | 0.232 | 0.554 | |
| rs2033008 | 2q12 |
| 0.293 | 0.76 (0.51–1.11) | 0.147 | 0.252 | 0.62 (0.42–0.91) | 0.015 | 0.354 |
| rs1027003 | 2q12 | 0.110 | 3.16 (1.46–6.88) | 0.002 | 0.058 | 1.58 (0.67–3.71) | 0.295 | 0.038 | |
| rs1474220 | 2q12.3 |
| 0.106 | 0.59 (0.35–1.00) | 0.050 | 0.136 | 0.79 (0.48–1.30) | 0.353 | 0.167 |
| rs899259 | 2q13 |
| 0.098 | 0.66 (0.38–1.14) | 0.134 | 0.075 | 0.49 (0.28–0.90) | 0.019 | 0.142 |
| rs1509414 | 2q13 |
| 0.037 | 0.40 (0.18–0.88) | 0.020 | 0.041 | 0.45 (0.21–0.98) | 0.039 | 0.096 |
| rs1567366 | 2q13 |
| 0.561 | 1.34 (0.94–1.92) | 0.105 | 0.576 | 1.44 (1.01–2.07) | 0.045 | 0.488 |
| rs2119112 | 2q14.2 |
| 0.110 | 0.57 (0.34–0.95) | 0.029 | 0.107 | 0.55 (0.33–0.93) | 0.025 | 0.179 |
chi-square test.
minor allele frequency in stage 2 control was 0.494.
minor allele in control was major allele in POAG and NTG subjects.
MAF; minor allele frequency, CI; confidence interval.
Figure 2High-density scan of the GLC1B region on chromosome 2 to identify candidate glaucoma genes.
Six SNPs that showed significant evidence of association with POAG or NTG (p<0.01) and the previously-reported candidate NCK2 gene are shown. Vertical line shows p value (−log10), and horizontal line shows chromosomal location (kb).
Stage One and Stage Two Association Test Results.
| Stage One Screening | ||||||||
| POAG | NTG | CNTL | ||||||
| SNP | Minor Allele | MAF | Odds ratio | p value | MAF | Odds ratio | p value | MAF |
| rs1239066 | C | 0.293 | 3.04 (1.95–4.72) | 0.009 | 0.269 | 1.55 (1.01–2.38) | 0.045 | 0.192 |
| rs1529385 | T | 0.053 | 0.39 (0.20–0.77) | 0.005 | 0.087 | 0.66 (0.37–1.20) | 0.173 | 0.125 |
| rs869833 | G | 0.467 | 1.66 (1.15–2.40) | 0.006 | 0.376 | 1.14 (0.79–1.65) | 0.490 | 0.346 |
| rs960011 | T | 0.415 | 0.57 (0.40–0.82) | 0.001 | 0.512 | 0.85 (0.60–1.21) | 0.232 | 0.554 |
| rs1027003 | G | 0.110 | 3.16 (1.46–6.88) | 0.002 | 0.058 | 1.58 (0.67–3.71) | 0.295 | 0.038 |
| rs678350 | G | 0.333 | 1.50 (1.01–2.23) | 0.043 | 0.371 | 1.77 (1.19–2.62) | 0.004 | 0.250 |
| rs2033008 | A | 0.293 | 0.76 (0.51–1.11) | 0.147 | 0.252 | 0.62 (0.42–0.91) | 0.015 | 0.354 |
MAF; Minor allele frequency, CNTL; Control.
Fisher's exact test.
Stage Two HK2 SNPs Allele Frequencies in Japanese POAG, NTG and Control Subjects.
| Allele frequency | Genotype | |||||||
| rs678350 | A | G | Odds ratio (CI) | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value |
| POAG | 0.666 | 0.334 | 1.58 (1.18–2.11) | 0.0027 | 82/187 | 85/187 | 20/187 | 0.0046 |
| NTG | 0.663 | 0.337 | 1.60 (1.23–2.08) | 4.7XE-4 | 133/286 | 113/286 | 40/286 | 0.0039 |
| Control | 0.758 | 0.242 | 161/271 | 89/271 | 21/271 | |||
Fisher's exact test; dominant model.
G/G or T/T is mutant homozygote, A/G or A/T is heterozygote, and A/A is wild homozygote.
Correlation between the POAG or NTG Endophenotypes and HK2 SNPs Screened in Stage Two.
| Endophenotype | Age at diagnosis (y.o.) | Maximum IOP* (mmHg) | MD value of the visual field (dB) | |||||||||
| rs678350 genotype | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value |
| POAG | 61.6 | 55.3 | 59.0 | 0.83 | 24.0 | 23.6 | 21.9 | 0.56 | −14.82 | −15.64 | −11.94 | 0.53 |
| NTG | 57.5 | 54.9 | 56.9 | 0.99 | 17.1 | 16.0 | 17.6 | 0.64 | −10.72 | −12.10 | −7.14 | 0.37 |
IOP; intraocular pressure (under medication).
Dunnett's test.
G/G or T/T is mutant homozygote, A/G or A/T is heterozygote, and A/A is wild homozygote.
Stage Two NCK2 SNP rs2033008 Allele Frequencies in Japanese POAG, NTG and Controls Subjects.
| Allele frequency | Genotype | |||||||
| T | A | Odds ratio (CI) | p value | T/T | T/A | A/A | p value | |
| POAG | 0.703 | 0.297 | 0.87 (0.65–1.16) | 0.35 | 89/187 | 85/187 | 13/187 | 0.069 |
| NTG | 0.750 | 0.250 | 0.69 (0.53–0.89) | 0.0053 | 159/286 | 111/286 | 16/286 | 0.0056 |
| Control | 0.673 | 0.327 | 130/271 | 105/271 | 36/271 | |||
Fisher's exact test,
Chi-square test.
A/A is mutant homozygote, T/A is heterozygote, and T/T is wild homozygote.
Correlation between the POAG or NTG Endophenotypes and NCK2 SNP rs2033008 Screened in Stage Two.
| Endophenotype | Age at diagnosis (y.o.) | Maximum IOP | MD value of the visual field (dB) | |||||||||
| Genotype | T/T | T/A | A/A | p value | T/T | T/A | A/A | p value | T/T | T/A | A/A | p value |
| POAG | 55.8 | 61.0 | 54.2 | 0.94 | 23.7 | 24.2 | 25.0 | 0.87 | −15.38 | −14.94 | −12.28 | 0.63 |
| NTG | 56.8 | 56.0 | 52.2 | 0.70 | 16.7 | 17.0 | 16.0 | 0.79 | −9.83 | −10.95 | −16.28 | 0.05 |
IOP; intraocular pressure (under medication).
Dunnett's test.
A/A is mutant homozygote, T/A is heterozygote, and T/T is wild homozygote.
Stage Two TMEM182 SNP Allele Frequencies in Japanese POAG, NTG and Control Subjects.
| Allele frequency | Genotype | ||||||
| rs869833 | A | G | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value |
| POAG | 0.590 | 0.410 | 0.855 | 61/187 | 99/187 | 27/187 | 0.095 |
| NTG | 0.579 | 0.421 | 0.834 | 94/286 | 143/286 | 49/286 | 0.269 |
| Control | 0.585 | 0.415 | 100/271 | 117/271 | 54/271 | ||
Fisher's exact test,
Chi-square test.
G/G or T/T is mutant homozygote, A/G or C/T is heterozygote, and A/A or C/C is wild homozygote.
Correlation between the POAG or NTG Endophenotypes and TMEM182 SNPs Screened in Stage Two.
| Endophenotype | Age at diagnosis (y.o.) | Maximum IOP | MD value of the visual field (dB) | |||||||||
| rs869833 Genotype | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value | A/A | A/G | G/G | p value |
| POAG | 54.8 | 61.1 | 56.0 | 0.95 | 24.7 | 23.8 | 23.3 | 0.80 | −17.5 | −15.0 | −9.95 | 0.01 |
| NTG | 55.8 | 55.7 | 59.9 | 0.40 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 16.4 | 0.84 | −12.60 | −9.62 | −12.21 | 0.98 |
IOP; intra ocular pressure (under medication),
Dunnett's test.
G/G or T/T is mutant homozygote, A/G or C/T is heterozygote, and A/A or C/C is wild homozygote.
Figure 3Hk2 and Nck2 Immunohistochemistory.
Representative IHC photographs showing Hk2, Nck2, astrocyte maker (GFAP) and RGC marker (C38) in the retinas of untreated mice. Arrows indicated the co-localization area.
Clinical Characteristics of Subjects studied in Stage One and Two Screening.
| Endophenotype | Age at diagnosis (y.o.) | Maximum IOP | The Visual Field Score | |
| Stage One | POAG | 56.9±11.4 | 25.3±5.6 | 2.8±1.0 |
| NTG | 54.0±12.2 | 16.0±2.3 | 2.7±0.9 | |
| Control | 70.3±10.2 | 13.9±2.2 | ||
| Stage Two | POAG | 57.8±12.0 | 23.5±5.3 | −15.0±9.0 (dB) |
| NTG | 56.4±13.3 | 16.8±2.4 | −11.0±7.1 (dB) | |
| Control | 69.7±9.3 | 13.9±2.2 | ||
IOP; intra ocular pressure (under medication).
The Visual Field Score was evaluated by Humphrey MD value or Goldmann perimetry (Stage One) and Humphrey MD value (Stage Two).
In Stage One, the severity of the visual field defects was scored from 1 to 5 according to previously reported criteria. The data obtained by two types of perimetry were combined using a five-point scale: 1, no alterations; 2, early defects; 3, moderate defects; 4, severe defects; and 5, light perception only or no light perception. The first four groups on this severity scale followed Kozaki's classification based on Goldmann perimetry or the classification was based on results of visual field perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Kozaki's classification is widely used in Japan.