Literature DB >> 23348867

Variations among US hospitals in counseling practices regarding prematurely born infants.

A Mehrotra1, J Lagatta, P Simpson, U Olivia Kim, M Nugent, M A Basir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied several counselor-independent elements of prenatal counseling regarding prematurely born infants. Elements studied include: indications to offer counseling, clinical settings in which counseling is offered, personnel assigned to counsel, availability of tools to assist counseling and post-counseling documentation requirements.
METHOD: As the study aimed to explore system-based practices and not counselor-based practices, we surveyed Neonatal Intensive Care Unit medical directors. RESULT: Responses were received from 352 hospitals (53%) in 47 states. Analysis was based on responses from the 337 hospitals that routinely counseled women anticipating a premature birth. In 299 (≈ 90%) hospitals, counseling was primarily performed by neonatal professionals. Premature labor was the most common indication to offer counseling; however, in 54 hospitals most counseling was offered before labor and based on maternal risk factors for preterm delivery. In nearly all (99.7%) hospitals information was provided verbally and face-to-face; a third of the hospitals also provided written information. For non-English-speaking Hispanic patients, 208 (62%) of the hospitals had certified hospital-based Spanish interpreters. Five (1%) hospitals provided specialized training to the designated prenatal counselors. The upper gestational age eligible for counseling at all 337 hospitals included 33 weeks; in 134 hospitals, gestational age of <23 weeks was not eligible for counseling.
CONCLUSION: Antenatal parental counseling for premature delivery is a widely practiced intervention with substantial system-based variability in execution. Interventions and strategies known to improve overall counseling effectiveness are not commonly utilized. We speculate that guidelines and tool-kits supported by Pediatric and Obstetric professional organizations may help improve system-based practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348867     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2012.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  9 in total

1.  Smartphone-based prenatal education for parents with preterm birth risk factors.

Authors:  U Olivia Kim; K Barnekow; S I Ahamed; S Dreier; C Jones; M Taylor; Md K Hasan; M A Basir
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  A Pilot Study of Neonatologists' Decision-Making Roles in Delivery Room Resuscitation Counseling for Periviable Births.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Fatima McKenzie; Janet E Panoch; Douglas B White; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-07

4.  Giving Voice to Parents in the Development of the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) Mobile App.

Authors:  Kris Pizur-Barnekow; Una Olivia Kim; Sheikh I Ahamed; Md Kamrul K Hasan; Shannon Dreier; Steven R Leuthner; Nicole Rau; Mir A Basir
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.874

5.  Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; Arno Van Heijst; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Jos Draaisma; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Complications of prematurity: an infographic.

Authors:  P Chandrasekharan; M Rawat; S Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Effect of written outcome information on attitude of perinatal healthcare professionals at the limit of viability: a randomized study.

Authors:  V Papadimitriou; B Tosello; R Pfister
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Mobile applications for prematurity: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Malihe Sadeghi; Mehdi Kahouei; Shahrbanoo Pahlevanynejad; Ali Valinejadi; Marjan Momeni; Farzaneh Kermani; Hamed Seddighi
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-09-21

9.  Parental understanding of crucial medical jargon used in prenatal prematurity counseling.

Authors:  Nicole M Rau; Mir A Basir; Kathryn E Flynn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.