Literature DB >> 23348206

Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm: implications for endoscopic surveillance.

Dipti Mahajan1, Erinn Downs-Kelly, Xiuli Liu, Rish K Pai, Deepa T Patil, Lisa Rybicki, Ana E Bennett, Thomas Plesec, Oscar Cummings, Douglas Rex, John R Goldblum.   

Abstract

The presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous component (VC) defines an advanced adenoma (AA) in patients with 1 or 2 adenomas <1 cm in size. Current consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AA undergo more intense postpolypectomy surveillance. In these clinical situations, the interobserver reliability in determining VC and HGD would play a major role in the credibility of these consensus guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of VC and HGD in polyps <1 cm before and after the development of consensus criteria among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Five GI pathologists independently evaluated 107 colorectal adenomas <1 cm, and classified them into tubular adenomas or adenomas with a VC (A-VC) and into low-grade dysplasia or HGD. Then a consensus conference was held and consensus criteria for VC and HGD were developed by group review. The same set of 107 slides were rereviewed independently by the same 5 GI pathologists. Interobserver variability using κ statistical analysis before and after the application of consensus criteria was assessed. A 1-sided z-test was used to determine whether κ scores increased after the consensus conference. Interobserver agreement before and after the consensus conference was poor for assessment of A-VC, HGD, and AA. These data calls into question the validity of basing clinical decisions on this distinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348206     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  13 in total

1.  Infiltration pattern predicts metastasis and progression better than the T-stage and grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a proposal for a novel infiltration-based morphologic grading.

Authors:  Orhun Cig Taskin; Michelle D Reid; Pelin Bagci; Serdar Balci; Ayse Armutlu; Deniz Demirtas; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Burcu Saka; Bahar Memis; Emine Bozkurtlar; Can Berk Leblebici; Adelina Birceanu; Yue Xue; Mert Erkan; Yersu Kapran; Arzu Baygul; Cenk Sokmensuer; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Luchini; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Interobserver Agreement in Assessing Dysplasia in Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps: A Multicentric Iranian Study.

Authors:  Tahmineh Mollasharifi; Mahsa Ahadi; Elena Jamali; Afshin Moradi; Parisa Asghari; Saman Maroufizadeh; Behrang Kazeminezhad
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2020-04-05

3.  Can the Sum of Adenoma Diameters (Adenoma Bulk) on Index Examination Predict Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia?

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Carolyn B Morris; Douglas J Robertson; Elizabeth L R Barry; Jane C Figueiredo; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Roberd M Bostick; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Takahiro Fujii; Yasushi Sano; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Oda; Kinichi Hotta; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yutaka Saito; Nozomu Kobayashi; Masau Sekiguchi; Kazuo Konishi; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Hiroyasu Iishi; Yoji Takeuchi; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Miwa Sada; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Kiwamu Hasuda; Tomoaki Shinohara; Hideki Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takahiro Fujimori; Yoichi Ajioka; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

6.  Tissue mRNA for S100A4, S100A6, S100A8, S100A9, S100A11 and S100P Proteins in Colorectal Neoplasia: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Eva Peterova; Jan Bures; Paula Moravkova; Darina Kohoutova
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Exploration of the Key Proteins of High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia to Adenocarcinoma Sequence Using In-Depth Quantitative Proteomics Analysis.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Chun-Yuan Li; Meng Pan; Jing-Ying Li; Wei Ge; Lai Xu; Yi Xiao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.

Authors:  Naim Abu-Freha; Lior H Katz; Revital Kariv; Elez Vainer; Ido Laish; Nathan Gluck; Elizabeth E Half; Zohar Levi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 9.  Who Needs Follow-Up after Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Adenomas?

Authors:  Sebastian Belle
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

Review 10.  CAD systems for colorectal cancer from WSI are still not ready for clinical acceptance.

Authors:  Sara P Oliveira; Pedro C Neto; João Fraga; Diana Montezuma; Ana Monteiro; João Monteiro; Liliana Ribeiro; Sofia Gonçalves; Isabel M Pinto; Jaime S Cardoso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.