Literature DB >> 23346496

Laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy for duodenal ulcer perforation: a single institution experience of 21 cases.

Chung Hyeun Ma1, Min Gyu Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the great advances in laparoscopic techniques, most active general surgeons do not apply laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation when facing a real-life emergency. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in duodenal ulcer perforation, and provide a step-by-step protocol with tips and recommendations for less experienced surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March, 2011 and May, 2012, 21 patients presenting with duodenal ulcer perforation underwent laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy. There were no contraindications to perform laparoscopic surgery, and the choice of primary repair was decided according to the size of the perforation. The procedure for laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy consisted of peritoneal lavage, primary suture, and omentopexy using a knot pusher.
RESULTS: During the operation, no conversion to open surgery or intra-operative events occurred. The median operation time was 45.0 minutes (20~80 minutes). Median day of commencement of a soft diet was day 6 (4~17 days). After surgery, the median hospital stay was 8.0 days (5~27 days). Postoperative complications occurred in one patient, which included a minor leakage. This complication was resolved by conservative management.
CONCLUSIONS: Although our study was carried out on a small number of patients at a single institution, we conclude that laparoscopic primary repair can be an effective surgical method in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation. We believe that the detailed explanation of our procedure will help beginners to perform laparoscopic primary repair more easily.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duodenal ulcer; Laproscopy; Perforation; Primary repair

Year:  2012        PMID: 23346496      PMCID: PMC3543974          DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.4.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1598-1320            Impact factor:   3.720


  26 in total

1.  Open vs laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; R Mårvik; G Johnsen; J E Thoresen; B Ystgaard; H E Myrvold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis.

Authors:  G S Robertson; S A Wemyss-Holden; G J Maddern
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; D W Easter; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J B Sø; C K Kum; M L Fernandes; P Goh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A practical way to overcome the learning period of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Min Gyu Kim; Kap Choong Kim; Jeong Hwan Yook; Beom Su Kim; Tae Hwan Kim; Byung Sik Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J M Naesgaard; B Edwin; O Reiertsen; E Trondsen; A E Faerden; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-03

8.  Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  I Michelet; F Agresta
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-05

9.  A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique.

Authors:  W Y Lau; K L Leung; K H Kwong; I C Davey; C Robertson; J J Dawson; S C Chung; A K Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Vinay G Mehendale; Sharad N Shenoy; Atul M Joshi; Namita C Chaudhari
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of human adipose-derived stem cells isolated from subcutaneous, omental, and intrathoracic adipose tissue depots for regenerative applications.

Authors:  Valerio Russo; Claire Yu; Paul Belliveau; Andrew Hamilton; Lauren E Flynn
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Perforation on the superior side of duodenum is a risk factor of laparoscopic primary repair for duodenal ulcer perforation.

Authors:  Hyun Il Kim; Yu Jeong Cho; Jong Hoon Yeom; Woo Jae Jeon; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.