Literature DB >> 10231653

Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

J M Naesgaard1, B Edwin, O Reiertsen, E Trondsen, A E Faerden, A R Rosseland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Central hospital, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18-86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991-May 1996.
INTERVENTIONS: Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48-160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20-160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3-23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2-28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231653     DOI: 10.1080/110241599750007063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery.

Authors:  B Kirshtein; M Bayme; T Mayer; L Lantsberg; E Avinoach; S Mizrahi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic truncal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy and open surgery in peptic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Seok-Mo Kim; Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Applications of hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft in abdominal surgery-a review of their utility and efficacy.

Authors:  Vasudevan Baskaran; Jayant Kumar Banerjee; Sita Ram Ghosh; Sukumar Santosh Kumar; Subramaniam Anand; Govind Menon; Deep Shikha Mishra; Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results.

Authors:  Simone Guadagni; Ismail Cengeli; Christian Galatioto; Niccolò Furbetta; Vincenzo Lippolis Piero; Giuseppe Zocco; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  R Lunevicius; M Morkevicius
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy for duodenal ulcer perforation: a single institution experience of 21 cases.

Authors:  Chung Hyeun Ma; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.