| Literature DB >> 23346166 |
Zhen-Lin Yang1, Kai Cheng, Zhao-Dong Han.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Few cells with stem cell characteristics possess capabilities of self-renewal and differentiation, which leads to high tumorigenesis and resistance to standard chemotherapeutic agents. These cells are mostly quiescent, and arrest occurs at the mitotic G0/G1 phase in mitosis. We explored the effects of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on the MCF-7 cell cycle with CD44(+)/CD24(-).Entities:
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Cell cycle; Fibroblast growth factors; Stem cells
Year: 2012 PMID: 23346166 PMCID: PMC3542845 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Breast Cancer ISSN: 1738-6756 Impact factor: 3.588
Figure 1(A) MCF-7 cells culture. Some of the MCF-7 cells have fusiform shape, and some have polygonal shape. they array orderly in general (×20). (B) MCF-7 mammosphere culture. MCF-7 cells cultured in the medium that was supplemented with 2% B27, 5 µg/mL bovine insulin, 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor 2, and 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor at a density of 2,000 cells/mL generate mammosphere (×20).
Figure 2(A) CD44+/CD24- cells subpopulation of unselected MCF-7. Flow cytometric analysis of MCF-7 cells labeled with CD24-FITC and CD44-PE antibodies. Total unselected MCF-7 cells can be divided into two distinct subpopulations: CD44+/CD24-, CD44-/CD24-. (B) CD44+/CD24- cells subpopulation of mammosphere culture cells. CD44+/CD24- cells and CD44-/CD24- cells were sorted by adding FITC anti-human CD24 and PE anti-human CD44 from mammosphere culture MCF-7 cells.
FITC=fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Figure 3Cell cycle of CD44+/CD24- cells in different bFGF concentration. (A) Cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry using a BrdU Flow Kit and the percent of the cell cycle phase is shown in a bar graph form with the G0/G1 (93.1%) and S (6.93%) phases for the cell lines in the absence of bFGF. (B) Cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry using a BrdU Flow Kit and the percent of the cell cycle phase is shown in a bar graph form with the G0/G1 (85.3%) and S (14.7%) phases for the cell lines in the presence of bFGF (10 ng/mL). (C) Cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry using a BrdU Flow Kit and the percent of the cell cycle phase is shown in a bar graph form with the G0/G1 (76.8%), G2 (4.34%) and S (18.8%) phases for the cell lines in the presence of bFGF (25 ng/mL). (D) Cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometry using a BrdU Flow Kit and the percent of the cell cycle phase is shown in a bar graph form with the G0/G1 (62.8%), and S (37.2%) phases for the cell lines in the presence of bFGF (50 ng/mL).
The percentage of cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases under different concertration of bFGF
Cell cycle analysis was performed at 24 hours after cells was stimulated with 0, 10, 25, 50 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and cell numbers were determined. The percentage of cells in G0/G1 was greatly significant under different concentration of bFGF. The values were calculated from the cell numbers between 0, 10, 25, 50 ng/mL bFGF group. Statistical differences were χ2=18.08, *p=0.001.
Figure 4The correlation between the percentage of cells in G0/G1 under different bFGF concentration. The values were calculated on the correlation between the percentage of cells in G0/G1 under different bFGF concentration. Statistical differences were Z=2.28, p=0.023 by Cochran-Armitage. The percentage of cells in G0/G1 decreased with the bFGF concentration increased.