Literature DB >> 23344903

"Deafness" effects in detecting alterations to auditory feedback during sequence production.

Peter Q Pfordresher1.   

Abstract

Past research has shown that when discrete responses are associated with a perceptual goal, performers may have difficulty detecting stimuli that are commensurate with that goal. Three experiments are reported here that test whether such effects extend to sequence production. In Experiment 1, participants performed 8-note melodies repeatedly, and on each trial a single tone could be altered with respect to its pitch and/or synchrony with actions. Results suggested a selective deficit of detection when feedback pitch was unchanged and the event was slightly delayed. Experiment 2 showed that this "deafness" to feedback is limited to rhythmic motor tasks that require sequencing, in that similar effects did not emerge when participants produced pitch sequences by tapping a single key repeatedly. A third experiment demonstrated similar results to Experiment 1 when the mapping of keys to pitches on the keyboard was reversed. Taken together, results suggest a selective deafness to response-congruent delayed feedback, consistent with the idea that performers suppress previously planned events during production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344903     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0477-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  38 in total

1.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.

Authors:  M Smith; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  AN INFORMATION-FLOW MODEL OF THE ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR ACTIVITY. I: TRANSDUCTION, TRANSMISSION AND CENTRAL CONTROL OF SENSORY INFORMATION.

Authors:  R A CHASE
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

5.  Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-04

6.  The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music.

Authors:  Jon B Prince; Mark A Schmuckler; William F Thompson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

7.  Speed, accuracy, and serial order in sequence production.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Caroline Palmer; Melissa K Jungers
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-02

8.  The role of pitch and temporal diversity in the perception and production of musical sequences.

Authors:  Jon B Prince; Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-09-08

Review 9.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Delayed auditory feedback and movement.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.