Literature DB >> 23344724

Intracerebral Infusion of Antisense Oligonucleotides Into Prion-infected Mice.

Karah Nazor Friberg1, Gene Hung, Ed Wancewicz, Kurt Giles, Chris Black, Sue Freier, Frank Bennett, Stephen J Dearmond, Yevgeniy Freyman, Pierre Lessard, Sina Ghaemmaghami, Stanley B Prusiner.   

Abstract

Mice deficient for the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) do not develop prion disease; accordingly, gene-based strategies to diminish PrP(C) expression are of interest. We synthesized a series of chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) targeted against mouse Prnp messenger RNA (mRNA) and identified those that were most effective in decreasing PrP(C) expression. Those ASOs were also evaluated in scrapie-infected cultured cells (ScN2a) for their efficacy in diminishing the levels of the disease-causing prion protein (PrP(Sc)). When the optimal ASO was infused intracerebrally into FVB mice over a 14-day period beginning 1 day after infection with the Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) strain of mouse prions, a prolongation of the incubation period of almost 2 months was observed. Whether ASOs can be used to develop an effective therapy for patients dying of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease remains to be established.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23344724      PMCID: PMC3381600          DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2011.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids        ISSN: 2162-2531            Impact factor:   10.183


Introduction

Over the past 3 decades, a distinct protein has been found to accumulate in the brains of patients suffering from each of the neurodegenerative diseases. Mutations have been found in the respective genes encoding the particular etiologic proteins responsible for the familial forms of the neurodegenerative diseases. Increasing evidence argues that each of the disease-causing proteins undergo posttranslational modification in a self-perpetuating process. This prion-like mechanism leads to the accumulation of the modified, etiologic proteins. In Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease of humans, scrapie of sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and chronic wasting disease, the cellular prion protein (PrPC) undergoes refolding into the disease-causing isoform (PrPSc). The progressive accumulation of PrPSc in the brain leads to central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction that is accompanied by neuronal vacuolation and astrocytic gliosis. In some cases, amyloid plaques composed of PrPSc are found within the CNS but such plaques are not an obligatory feature of these disorders. Many lines of evidence converged to argue that PrPSc is the sole component of the infectious prion particle. Later, knockout of the PrP gene encoding PrPC was found to render mice resistant to experimental scrapie. This finding suggested that patients dying of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease would benefit from therapeutics that lower the levels of PrPC and/or PrPSc. Both RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have been used to lower the levels of PrPC and PrPSc in scrapie-infected cultured cells (ScN2a). RNAi molecules have been found to lower PrP mRNA levels and hence PrPC.[1,2,3,4] In ScN2a cells as well as in the brains of scrapie-infected mice, the levels of PrPSc were also lowered by exposure to sequence-specific RNAi molecules. In contrast to the RNAi results, ASOs are confounded by the ability of these polymers to lower PrPSc levels in ScN2a independent of their sequence.[5,6] Treatment of prion diseases using transgenic (Tg) mice with inducible PrPC expression systems have been performed.[7,8] Tg(NFH-Cre/MloxP) mice were inoculated with the Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) prions at 3–4 weeks of age.[7] Cre-mediated recombination at 10–12 weeks of age was effectively used to suppress neuronal PrPC expression but not that in other CNS cells. Shutting off PrPC expression in neurons, even after mice developed signs of neurologic dysfunction, reversed spongiform degeneration and prevented clinical disease. Surprisingly, mice remained asymptomatic even though their brains were inundated with extraneuronal PrPSc deposits. In bigenic Tg(tTA:PrP+/0)3 mice, PrPC expression was regulated by oral doxycycline administration.[8] PrPC expression was reduced by 95% in the brains of bigenic mice compared to wild-type mice, which extended survival times following prion inoculation from ~150 to ~430 days when the mice eventually developed clinical disease. In these mice, PrPC suppression prevented pyramidal nerve cell death and enhanced the clearance of PrPSc deposits. Recently, a single injection of small hairpin RNA targeting PrP into the hippocampus of Tg37 mice protected the thalamus and cortex, brain regions distal to the injection site, from prion-induced neurodegeneration and prolonged survival time from 85 to 105 days even though PrPC expression was reduced only at the border of the injection site.[4] Several clinically desirable advantages over lentiviral injections of RNAi molecules are offered by the intracerebral ventricular (ICV) delivery of ASOs that are fully phosphorothioated (PS). The five base caps at each end of the 20mer ASO were methoxyethyl-modified to increase potency and stability as well as to decrease proinflammatory effects. The PS modification in the backbone of DNA, in which one non-bridging oxygen atom is replaced with a sulfur atom, increases nuclease resistance, resulting in enhanced stability both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, the PS modification improves tissue distribution and cell uptake in vivo. The methoxyethyl modification increases the affinity of the ASOs for RNA and protects the 20mer from exonuclease degradation, resulting in an extended duration of action in tissues due to a longer metabolic half-life.[9] Once introduced into the cells, hybridization of the ASO to the target mRNA results in RNase H cleavage of the message and suppression of gene expression.[10] Here, we report on ASOs targeting mouse Prnp mRNA that suppress PrPC expression and inhibit PrPSc formation in cell culture and scrapie-infected mice. Intraventricular infusion of an ASO, for 14 days beginning 1 day after inoculation with RML prions, extended incubation periods in prion-infected mice by almost 2 months.

Results

Strategy. We synthesized and screened 78 ASOs with methoxyethyl gapmer chemistry targeting the mouse (Mo) PrP message in a mouse endothelial cell line designated b.END. From this panel, we identified the 10 most active ASOs for PrP transcript knockdown by dose response. The three most-effective ASOs—742, 747, and 771—were then screened for efficacy in reducing PrPC and PrPSc in N2a and ScN2a cells, respectively. These three ASOs were injected intraperitoneally (ip) in uninfected FVB mice to evaluate tolerance as well as to verify in vivo transcript and protein knockdown in the liver. Next, the three ASOs were tested for RNA and protein knockdown in the brain by intracerebral administration into the left lateral ventricle through a cannula using an implanted Alzet osmotic pump. Of the three most effective ASOs, 771 was chosen for further study in scrapie-infected mice (). High-throughput screening of 78 ASOs by quantitative real-time (qRT) PCR identified the 10 with the greatest mRNA knockdown efficacy (). These 10 ASOs were then evaluated by measuring the dose-dependent responses in b.END cells; ASOs were added at increasing concentrations (6.5–200 nmol/l) in the presence of the lipofectamine transfection reagent (). ASOs 742, 747, and 771 had the greatest potency, with PrP mRNA levels reduced by 94, 97, and 97%, respectively, at the 200-nmol/l dose compared to cells treated with non–sequence-specific control ASO 923 (). Based on reductions in PrP mRNA levels in b.END cells, ASOs 742, 747, and 771 were screened in N2a cells. These ASOs target three sites in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of MoPrP mRNA (NM_011170.1; ). Furthermore, this experimental scenario better mimics in vivo delivery of the drug into the brain. Cells were cultured for 30 days in the continuous presence of 500 nmol/l of each ASO and lysates were collected at 2, 7, 14, and 28 days for analysis of PrPC expression by western immunoblots, which were quantified by densitometry (). ASO 771 reduced PrPC levels more rapidly than the other two ASOs, with a 60% reduction observed following 7 days of exposure and 84% reduction by 14 days. Control ASO 923 elicited low levels of non–sequence-specific reduction of PrPC expression, by ~20% at 7, 14, and 28 days. Antisense inhibition of PrP 27-30 in ScN2a cells. To determine whether ASO-mediated PrPC suppression affects PrPSc levels in prion-infected cells, ScN2a cells were cultured in the presence of 500 nmol/l of each lead ASO and lysates collected at 2, 7, 14, and 28 days. Following 2 days of treatment, levels of PrP 27-30, the protease-resistant core of PrPSc, were reduced by 81% with ASO 742, by 63% with ASO 747, and by 57% with ASO 771 (). After 7 days of exposure to ASOs 742, 747, or 771, PrP 27-30 was not detectable. Cells exposed to the control ASO 923 for 2 days showed a 41% reduction in PrP 27-30, and a 95% reduction in PrP 27-30 after 7 days. We and others had previously reported the reduction in PrPSc levels by sequence-scrambled PS oligonucleotides.[5,6] Following 28 days of exposure to each of the four ASOs including the control ASO 923, PrPSc was undetectable. To determine whether these observations were specific to ScN2a cells, these experiments were also performed with prion-infected GT1 cells, ScGT1. PrP 27-30 in this cell line was completely eliminated after 7 days of exposure to each of ASOs including the control ASO 923 (data not shown). To determine the ASO 771 concentration at which PrPC and PrPSc levels were suppressed by 50% (half maximal effective concentration (EC50)) in N2a and ScN2a cells, we treated cells with ASO 771 at concentrations ranging from 2 to 250 nmol/l, collected lysates after 7 days, then measured PrPC and PrPSc levels by western blot. Increasing ASO concentrations reduced the level of PrP 27-30 in ScN2a cells in an exponential manner (). The EC50 values for ASO 771 were 50 nmol/l for PrPC and 4 nmol/l for PrPSc. The control ASO 923 had an EC50 of 10 nmol/l for PrPSc due to non–sequence-specific effects (). It is noteworthy that ASO 771 was only able to reduce PrPC levels by 60% in cultured N2a cells at a concentration above 50 nnol/l (). This reduction was sequence-specific in contrast to the reduction of PrPSc, which exceeded 95% with less than 10 nmol/l of ASO 771. ASOs reduced PrP Based on our findings in cell culture, we investigated whether ASOs 742, 747, and 771 would be well-tolerated and effective in diminishing mRNA and PrPC levels in vivo. We administered each ASO to eight groups of five FVB mice for 21 days via ip injections. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and control ASO 847, which targets PTEN protein, were used as controls. The ASOs and PBS were administered ip twice weekly for 3 weeks, in doses of either 50 mg/kg/week or 100 mg/kg/week (). None of the mice showed negative effects through the course of ASO administration. All of the animals remained healthy until they were killed at 21 days. Routine clinical serum chemistry was performed and no abnormalities were observed (data not shown). Prnp mRNA expression in liver was determined by qRT-PCR; PrPC expression was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using anti-PrP HuM-Fab D18 for detection. The greatest Prnp mRNA and PrPC diminutions in liver were found with the ASO 742: on 50 or 100 mg/kg/week, respective reductions of 75 and 85% in PrP mRNA (), and of 65 and 72% in PrPC, were found (). ASO 771 at 50 mg/kg/week reduced Prnp mRNA by 30% and PrPC by ~50% in liver, as measured by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting, respectively. Intracerebral ventricular delivery of ASOs reduced brain PrP Encouraged by the safety profile and the effective reduction of PrPC by the ASOs in liver following systemic administration, we next characterized the tolerability and pharmacology of ASOs in the CNS via intracerebral ventricular (ICV) administration (). Two lead ASOs 771 and 742 were continuously infused into the right lateral ventricle (, region 3) of FVB mice using implanted Alzet osmotic pumps, at a dose of 75 µg/day for 21 days, after which mice were killed within 24 hours. A control group of mice was treated with PBS in the same manner for the same time period. The ASOs were well-tolerated; neither toxic side effects nor brain abscesses were observed. Histopathological analysis of a section of the midbrain, posterior to the cannulation site, showed no abnormalities (data not shown). mRNA and PrPC levels were evaluated using different brain regions. RNA was isolated from a portion of brain adjacent to the cannulated lateral ventricle and ventral to the cannulation site (, region 2). For PrPC, a portion of the brain anterior to and on the ipsilateral side of cannulation (, region 1) was homogenized in PBS (10% w/v) and analyzed by densitometry of western blots. PrP mRNA measured by qRT-PCR was ~60% lower in mice receiving either ASO 742 or 771 compared to mice infused with PBS (). Administration of ASO 742 and 771 resulted in 30% and ~70% less PrPC, respectively, in the brain compared to mice receiving PBS control injections as shown by immunoblotting (). Next, we conducted a dose-response study to determine the potency and tolerable dose compared to our previous, single-dose study for which 75 µg was administered per day. ASO 742 and 771, at doses of 25, 50, 75 and 100 µg/day, were continuously infused via ICV into the right lateral ventricle for 14 days (). A control group of mice received PBS via ICV delivery for the same time period. Mice were killed 24 hours after the end of the infusion. With the exception of 100 µg/day of ASO 742, all other doses were well-tolerated by the mice. PrP mRNA levels were analyzed in a brain section posterior to the cannulation site (, region 2) by qRT-PCR (). PrP mRNA expression levels decreased in an ASO dose-dependent manner. Delivery of ASO 742 at 50 µg/day reduced PrP mRNA levels by ~60% while ASO 771 at 100 µg/day decreased PrP mRNA by 70%. Histoblots of coronal cryosections showed that PrPC suppression was most marked on the cannulated side of the brain, but was also found on the contralateral side (). Mice infused with ASO 771 at 75 µg/day showed the most pronounced decrease in PrPC expression compared to those receiving PBS. A midbrain section (Bregma −2.92 mm) taken from a mouse treated with 75 µg/day of ASO 771 was fixed and stained with the ASO antibody (, brown staining). The ASO dispersed from the injection site, travelling a distance of 2.92 mm Bregma to the midbrain and penetrated neurons bilaterally. Together, these results demonstrate that ASO 771 administered in vivo to the brain by ICV infusion is well-tolerated and reduces both Prnp mRNA and PrPC. ASO 771 treatment of prion-inoculated mice. On day 0, mice were inoculated on the right side of the brain with RML prions. The next day, ICV infusion of ASO 771 (75 µg/d) or PBS was initiated on the left side of the brain and continued for 14 days. At 50 dpi (36 days after ICV treatment ended), six mice (three from the treated group and three from the control group) were killed in order to measure the levels of PrPC and PrPSc (). Another group of mice (eight from the treatment group and six controls) were observed until they developed signs of neurological dysfunction (). In mice killed at 50 dpi, histoblots showed that ASO 771 treatment diminished PrPC expression () and PrPSc levels () compared to PBS-infused control mice. PrPC expression was primarily reduced on the left side where ASO 771 was released from the tip of the cannula. As shown, PrPC was reduced in the substantia nigra, striatum, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, amygdala, and the periaqueductal region (). A less marked reduction was observed in the pons and cerebellum (data not shown). It appears that there is a pharmacologically significant gradient from the ipsilateral to contralateral side (, bottom row). To examine in situ PrPSc deposition, PrPC was degraded by limited digestion with proteinase K followed by GdnHCl denaturation of PrP 27-30 before immunostaining (). In the brains of PBS-treated mice killed at 50 dpi, PrPSc deposits were visible in the white matter tracts (corpus callosum, striatum), septum, hippocampus, and midbrain 1 and 2. The most intense immunostaining of PrPSc was seen in the thalamus at the site of inoculation. In the mice receiving ASO 771 and ASO 923, PrPSc deposits were minimal, indicating that the ASO inhibited prion replication and propagation bilaterally. Western immunoblotting of brain homogenates revealed that only ASO 771–treated FVB mice had decreased PrPC expression (, top proteinase K (PK)−), whereas both ASO 771 and ASO 923 treatment resulted in diminished signals for PrPSc (, bottom PK+, two different gels with different animals). Densitometry of western blots quantified a ~50% reduction of total PrP expression throughout the brains of ASO 771–treated mice compared to mice infused with PBS and to mice treated with ASO 923 (, top). PrPSc levels were reduced by 96% in ASO 771–treated mice and by 92% in ASO 923–treated mice (, bottom). Although both sequence-specific ASO 771 and non–sequence-specific ASO 923 reduced PrPSc levels equally well in the brains of prion-inoculated mice at 50 dpi, only ASO 771 reduced the PrPC substrate. The treated mice killed at 126 dpi showed a more advanced pathological deposition of PrPSc than those killed at 50 dpi described above. Histoblots of symptomatic control mice and asymptomatic ASO-treated mice at 126 dpi revealed abundant PrPSc in control mice but much less PrPSc in ASO-treated mice (). At the level of the septum (Bregma 0 mm), PrPSc was diminished in the frontal cerebral cortex and striatum/caudate nucleus on the side of the cannula. At the level of the hippocampus, the PrPSc signal was depressed bilaterally in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala. The ASO 771–treated mice killed at 126 dpi showed considerable PrPSc in the right thalamus where they had been inoculated with RML prions; they also harbored PrPSc deposits in the right corpus callosum. At the level of midbrain 1 (Bregma −2.92 mm), no PrPSc was detected in the cerebral cortex, substantia nigra, ventral hippocampus, or periaquel aquaduct. In the brain stem (midbrain/pons/medulla), PrPSc levels were reduced ~50% compared to PBS-treated mice (). Immunohistochemical staining for PrPSc showed more intense staining in the hippocampus on the contralateral side of cannulation (data not shown). In a survival study, six control, prion-inoculated mice that received PBS developed neurological dysfunction with a mean incubation period of 136 ± 4 days. Eight mice treated with ASO 771 had a mean incubation period of 193 ± 10 days, representing a 40% prolongation in the incubation time (). One ASO-treated mouse exhibited signs of CNS dysfunction at 132 dpi while the other seven ASO-treated mice succumbed to disease between 183–228 dpi. ASO 771 administration for 14 days substantially reduced PrPSc levels in prion-infected mice, even 112 days after treatment ceased (126 dpi) at the time of killing (). ASO-treated mice exhibited PrPC levels that were slightly lower than those found in PBS-treated, control mice at 126 dpi (see ). A persistent, ASO-induced reduction in PrPC expression was observed in periventricular regions as well as the hippocampus and cerebellum. Delayed infusion of ASO 771. To assess the effectiveness of ASOs in mice with an established prion infection, we began infusing ASO 771 at 60 dpi. At this point in the incubation period, FVB mice remain asymptomatic but their brains show PrPSc accumulation as well as initial changes of astrocytic gliosis.11 Beginning 60 days after intracerebral inoculation with RML prions, the FVB mice received either 75 µg/day of ASO 771 (n = 24) or PBS (n = 8) by ICV. While 75 µg/day of ASO 771 was well-tolerated in uninfected FVB mice for 14 days, this dose was toxic in prion-infected mice, which had to be killed after 11 days. The toxicity of ASO 771 appears to be related to the stage of prion disease because similar ICV infusion started 1 dpi was well-tolerated (compare and ). This illness was likely unrelated to prion disease. That the illness observed in prion-infected FVB mice at 11 days after ICV infusion was related to ASO 771 is supported by the well-tolerated injection of PBS in control, infected mice that survived for 2 months following 11–14 days of ICV infusion and developed signs of scrapie at 131 ± 1 days (n = 4). The brains of ICV-infused mice were taken at 71 dpi and examined by immunohistochemistry to detect vacuolation and PrPSc plaque deposition () as well as by histoblotting in order to measure PrPC and PrPSc (). In mice receiving PBS, PrPSc deposition was widely distributed on both sides of the brain while those treated with ASO 771 exhibited considerably less PrPSc. Notably, much of the PrPSc remaining after ASO infusion was found in plaque-like deposits along the corpus callosum (). Histoblots prepared from brains of ASO 771–treated mice showed bilateral reductions of PrPC in the septum, hippocampus, and midbrain 1 region, albeit with a greater suppression on the cannulated, left side (). PrPSc levels were also reduced bilaterally in the hippocampus, substantia nigra, ventral hippocampus, cerebral cortex, midbrain, and brain stem after treatment with ASO 771 (). PrPSc was cleared from the thalamus, amygdala, and caudate nucleus on the cannulated, left side, but persisted in the corpus callosum and the thalamus on the contralateral right side. The control FVB mice receiving the PBS infusion and killed at 71 dpi showed PrPC and PrPSc deposits throughout their brains.

Discussion

The dual action of ASO 771—(i) specific degradation of Prnp mRNA and (ii) nonspecific reduction of PrPSc—complicates any interpretation of the studies described here. The PrP-specific ASO 771 suppressed PrPC expression by binding to Prnp mRNA and rendering these transcripts susceptible to digestion by RNase H.[10] Independent of the ASO sequence, these PS-DNA oligonucleotides reduced PrPSc levels, as previously reported for ScN2a cells.[5,6] The mechanism by which ASOs diminish PrPSc remains to be determined; it is unclear whether ASOs exert their antiprion action by inhibiting nascent PrPSc formation or accelerating PrPSc clearance. In ScN2a cells, the EC50 value for ASO 771 in lowering PrPC levels was 50 nmol/l and in reducing PrPSc levels was 4 nmol/l. In earlier studies, the EC50 value for a CpG PS-DNA 22mer was 4,000 nmol/l for lowering PrPC and was 70 nmol/l for reducing PrPSc.[6] This 22mer was not selected for its Prnp mRNA-lowering activity but rather for its ability to prolong the incubation times of mice inoculated ip with RML prions.[12] While only sequence-specific ASOs targeting mouse Prnp reduced PrPC levels, both sequence-specific ASOs and scrambled ASO 923 cleared PrPSc in ScN2a cells (). Dose-response experiments in ScN2a cells revealed that slightly higher concentrations of ASO 923 were required to reduce PrPSc levels compared to those found with sequence-specific ASO 771 (). In addition, longer treatment periods with ASO 923 were required to achieve the same level of knockdown as ASO 771 (). A similar sequence-independent reduction in PrPSc levels was observed in vivo (). Together, the results suggest that PrP-targeted, PS-modified ASOs can reduce brain prion levels by two independent mechanisms: reduction of Prnp mRNA and diminution of PrPSc. The in vivo studies with ASOs reported here argue that the reduction in PrPSc was greater than the diminution in PrPC; however, we cannot deduce from our data the relative contribution of PrPC suppression to reducing the level of PrPSc. The long tissue half-life of the ASOs (20–40 days in vivo) (ISIS unpublished data) and their ability to suppress PrPC and PrPSc expression for more than 100 days following cannula removal are noteworthy. When ASO 771 was administered immediately following prion inoculation for 14 days, PrPSc levels were reduced by 95% when measured 36 days after removal of the cannula (). Although ASO 771 administration significantly impeded PrPSc replication and extended survival times by almost 2 months, it did not eliminate PrPSc and the mice eventually succumbed to prion disease (). Interestingly, at 112 days after removal of the cannula, reduced levels of PrPC and PrPSc persisted, contending that ASO 771 was still present at sufficiently high concentrations to be biologically active (). Intraventricular infusion of ASOs. ASOs dispensed directly into the ventricular system via the CSF of the lateral ventricle have been previously reported to be an effective way to achieve widespread delivery throughout the brain and penetrate the neural tissue of rodents, dogs, and non-human primates.[13] Approximately half of the cannulated FVB mice died shortly after surgery—many of these deaths were due to hippocampal lesions resulting from accidental intraparenchymal catheter implantation. These mice were excluded from the study as well as the incubation time calculations. Those brain regions near the tip of the cannula were exposed to the highest levels of ASO 771, and reductions in PrPC and PrPSc occurred up to distances of 5.88 mm Bregma. ICV injection of ASO 771 through a cannula on the left side of the brain produced greater reductions of PrPSc than PrPC on the contralateral, right side where the prions were inoculated into the thalamus (). The greater reduction in PrPSc levels compared to PrPC is readily explained by the sequence-independent, ASO-mediated diminution in PrPSc demonstrated in cultured cells (). Our findings are consistent with results from an earlier study reported by one of us (S.B.P.) where PS-DNA (22mers) containing a methylated CpG motif (non-immune reactive) and scrambled CpG motifs equally diminished PrPSc levels in ScN2a cells, indicating a sequence-independent reduction of PrPSc.6 The EC50 values for these 22mers were 5 µmol/l for PrPC and 70 nmol/l for PrPSc. Bioassays with treated cell extracts demonstrated that the prion titers were reduced in the PS-DNA–treated ScN2a cells. In the work presented here, the EC50 value of the sequence-specific ASO 771 was 100-fold lower for PrPC (50 nmol/l) reduction than previously reported for the CpG motif 22mers (5 µmol/l). In addition, we did not observe a significant reduction of PrPC with the scrambled ASO 923, arguing that the PrPC reduction we observed with ASO 771 resulted from degradation of the Prnp transcripts. In another study, a series of random-sequence, single-stranded PS-DNA 40mers was added to ScN2a cells, resulting in diminished levels of PrPSc.[5] When Tg(SHaPrP)7 mice were given daily ip doses of one random-sequence PS-DNAs beginning 3 days before ip inoculation with SHa prions, the incubation times were prolonged from 88 to 330 days. After prion inoculation, the Tg7 mice received ip injections of the random-sequence PS-DNAs three times per week for 4 weeks. Since PS-DNAs administered ip did not traverse the blood-brain barrier, it is likely that the prolongation of incubation periods reported in these studies was due to systemic degradation of PrPSc outside of the CNS. In the study described here, we intracerebrally inoculated RML prions into the right thalamus and 1 day later inserted a cannula on the left side of the brain, through which we infused ASO 771 for 14 days. This ASO treatment protocol increased the incubation time from 136 to 193 days (). In the ASO 771–treated mice that were killed at 126 dpi, the PrPSc levels were reduced throughout the brain compared to the untreated controls, except in the right thalamus where both control and treated mice had been inoculated. It is instructive to compare the prolongation of the incubation time by ICV infusion of ASO 771–treated mice with that of Prnp+/0 mice where PrPC levels were reduced ~50%. In both cases, the mice had diminished PrPC from very early in the incubation period. In studies by one of us (S.B.P.), Prnp+/0/FVB mice inoculated with RML prions developed CNS dysfunction between 400 and 465 days after intracerebral inoculation compared to wt mice exhibiting neurologic signs at 146 days.[14] In another study, Prnp+/0 mice developed CNS dysfunction between 260 and 350 days after receiving RML prions ic.[15] Recently, a third study using the same gene knockout showed signs of neurological disease between 240 and 300 days after intracerebral inoculation of RML prions.[16] In the third study, prion titers were measured in the brains of Prnp+/0 mice using endpoint titrations in cultured cells. At 100 days after intracerebral inoculation, the brain titers were found to reach a maximum but more than another 150 days passed before signs of brain dysfunction were observed. The authors argued that an isoform other than PrPSc is neurotoxic and that this alternative form induces clinical signs. Whether infusions of ASOs can help decipher the molecular pathogenesis of prion disease is unknown at present. Concluding remarks. The sequence-independent inhibition of PrPSc formation complicated the interpretation of our findings using ASO 771. Delaying the infusion of ASOs until 60 days after inoculation resulted in many acute deaths (), which prevented us from measuring the antiprion effect of these PS-modified oligonucleotides. We were also unable to lower substantially the PrPC levels throughout the brain after ICV infusion of ASO 771; whether this approach can be modified into an effective therapeutic regimen remains to be determined.

Materials and Methods

ASO synthesis. Twelve oligonucleotides corresponding to regions within the 3′ UTR were synthesized and purified as previously described.[17] Oligonucleotides were PS-modified, chimeric oligonucleotides composed of five 2′-O-(2-methoxy)ethyl modifications on both the 5′ and 3′ ends, and 10 oligodeoxynucleotides in the center to support RNase H activity.[18] Oligonucleotide sequences were as follows: ASO 742 (TATATTCTTATTGGCCCGGT), ASO 747 (GCCTATGCTAAGTTACATGT), and ASO 771 (CCAAGGGTCACACGGTAAGC). ASO 923 (CCTTCCCTGAAGGTTCCTCC) was used as a control oligonucleotide because it shares identical chemistry and length to the PrP-targeted ASOs, is not predicted to hybridize to any known human or rat genes, and was previously shown not to have detectable effects in tissue culture or in mouse models.[19] Quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini prep kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. We combined 5–10 ng total RNA with 100 nmol/l of each of the gene-specific, dual-labeled probes, and forward and reverse primers in a buffered solution consisting of 1× TaqMan Buffer A (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 5.5 mmol/l MgCl2, 200 mmol/l concentrations of each dNTP (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), 2 U RNase inhibitor, 0.625 U AmpliTaq Gold, and 6.25 U murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. Except for dNTP solutions, all reagents above were obtained from Applied Biosystems. Quantitative RT-PCR reactions were conducted and analyzed on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems). Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA levels were used as an internal reference for normalization among samples. Primer probe set sequences for PrP were: forward, 5′-TCTGTGTCCCCCATAGGCTAA-3′ reverse, 5′-AGAGCAACTGGTCTACTGTACATTTCC-3′ probe, 5′-CCCCTGGCACTGATGGGCCC-3. Cell culture. For b.END, N2a and GT1 lines, cells were grown in 6-cm dishes in minimal essential medium until attaining 90–95% confluence. Cells were trypsinized and diluted tenfold into 60-mm plates containing 4 ml of minimal essential medium. On the following day, ASOs were added to the cells at various concentrations in their normal growth media and incubated for variable periods of time. For b.END cells, cells were washed once with PBS and were transfected using the lipofectamine transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using 3 µl lipofectin/1 ml Optimem/100 nmol/l ASO. The transfection mix was removed after 4 hours and replaced with normal growth media. All incubations were performed at 37 °C. Cells were harvested in 0.5 ml cold lysis buffer (10 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 8; 100 mmol/l NaCl; 0.5% NP-40; and 0.5% deoxycholate). RNA was harvested at different time points; for b.END cells, RNA was harvested 24 hours after transfection. Stock b.END and N2a cells were maintained in minimal essential medium. The cells were harvested using 4 ml of 0.5% trypsin and plated in a 1:20 dilution, fed on day 4, and trypsinized again in a 1:3 dilution onto 10-cm plates on day 6. All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mmol/l Glutamax (GIBCO BRL, Carlsbad, CA), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 units/ml streptomycin in a humidified 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Immunoblotting. Confluent 6-cm diameter plates (~4 × 106 cells) were washed in PBS and then lysed by the addition of 500 µl of lysis buffer. The nuclear pellet was removed, and the protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay as recommended by the manufacturer (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Proteinase K was added (1:50, PK:total protein), and the lysate was incubated at 37 °C for 1 hour. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 mmol/l phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride. Insoluble material was precipitated by ultracentrifugation at 48,000g for 1 hour at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in loading buffer, boiled for 5 minutes, then run on a 15% Tris·HCl gel for western blot analysis by using D18 as the detection antibody. Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with D18 were performed as previously described.[20] Quantification of PrPC levels. PrPC and PrPSc levels were quantified by either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or performing densitometry of scanned western blots films using NIH Image J software and expressed as percentages relative to that measured in cells treated with PBS. Inoculation and animal studies. All animal protocols were approved by the University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and met ethical standards for animal experimentation. Ip inoculations were performed in the abdomen. For therapeutic studies, FVB mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, then inoculated with 30 µl of mouse-adapted RML prions. Inocula were injected directly into the right thalamus. Mice were monitored thrice weekly. When they showed signs of prion disease, mice were euthanized. Brain cannulation and Alzet pump insertion in the subcutaneous pocket were performed on anesthetized animals. Surgical placement of osmotic pumps and harvesting tissues for analysis. FVB mice weighing at least 20 g were placed in a chamber for the induction of anesthesia using 3–5% isoflurane in an air mixture. The animal was placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf 942, two-channel digital small animal stereotax; David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA); a surgical plane of anesthesia was maintained with 2.5% isoflurane by a nose cone fitted to the stereotaxic instrument. A 1.5–2 cm midline incision was made in the scalp from the posterior of the occipital plate to the line connecting the eyes. A subcutaneous pocket measuring 5–6 cm deep was made with blunt dissection posterior from the incision over the left flank. The preloaded Alzet 2002 pump with tubing attached to the infusion cannula was inserted pump-first into the subcutaneous pocket, leaving the cannula outside of the incision. The top tab of the infusion cannula was placed in a cannula-holding apparatus (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA). The tubing of the cannula was aligned with the hole in the skull and advanced into the hole until the base was against the skull. The incision was closed by sutures. Histoblot. Histoblotting was performed as described previously.[21] Coronal cryosections of 10-µm thickness were collected at the level of the septum (Bregma 0 mm). For prion-infected FVB mice, additional cryosections were taken from the hippocampus (Bregma −1.64 mm), midbrain 1 (Bregma −2.92 mm), midbrain 2 (Bregma −4.20 mm), pons (Bregma −5.46 mm), and cerebellum (Bregma −5.88 mm). Sections were placed on glass slides, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes that were wetted in lysis buffer. Nitrocellulose strips were immersed in 100 mmol/l NaOH solution, incubated for 1 hour at room temperature, rinsed in tris-buffered saline and Tween-20 (TBST), immersed again in 100 mmol/l NaOH solution, incubated for 1 hour at room temperature, rinsed in TBST, then immersed in 3 mol/l guanidine isothiocyanate solution for 10 minutes at room temperature, and rinsed in TBST. Strips were blocked in 5% nonfat milk (made in TBST) for 30 minutes at room temperature, stained with the anti-PrP recombinant antibody D18 followed by alkaline phosphatase–conjugated, goat anti-human secondary antibody and detection with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT). Neuropathology. Brains were removed rapidly from euthanized animals and either immersion-fixed in 10% buffered formalin or frozen on dry ice for neuropathological analysis. For evaluation of neurodegeneration, paraffin-embedded brains sections (8 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemistry, PrPSc was detected on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections by the hydrolytic autoclaving method and with recFab HuM-P against PrP.[22] For evaluation of reactive astrocytic gliosis, we used a rabbit antiserum to glial fibrillary acidic protein (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) with peroxidase immunohistochemistry.[23]
Table 1

Percentage inhibition of Prnp mRNA expression in mouse b.END cells by different doses of ASOs compared to control cells treated with ASO 923

  23 in total

1.  Postexposure prophylaxis against prion disease with a stimulator of innate immunity.

Authors:  Shneh Sethi; Grayson Lipford; Hermann Wagner; Hans Kretzschmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Regional mapping of prion proteins in brain.

Authors:  A Taraboulos; K Jendroska; D Serban; S L Yang; S J DeArmond; S B Prusiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Determination of the role of the human RNase H1 in the pharmacology of DNA-like antisense drugs.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wu; Walt F Lima; Hong Zhang; Amy Fan; Hong Sun; Stanley T Crooke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Phosphorothioate oligonucleotides reduce PrP levels and prion infectivity in cultured cells.

Authors:  Marcela V Karpuj; Kurt Giles; Sagit Gelibter-Niv; Michael R Scott; Vishwanath R Lingappa; Francis C Szoka; David Peretz; Wilfred Denetclaw; Stanley B Prusiner
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.354

5.  Characterization of a potent and specific class of antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of human protein kinase C-alpha expression.

Authors:  R A McKay; L J Miraglia; L L Cummins; S R Owens; H Sasmor; N M Dean
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Heritable disorder resembling neuronal storage disease in mice expressing prion protein with deletion of an alpha-helix.

Authors:  T Muramoto; S J DeArmond; M Scott; G C Telling; F E Cohen; S B Prusiner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Efficient and specific down-regulation of prion protein expression by RNAi.

Authors:  G Tilly; J Chapuis; D Vilette; H Laude; J L Vilotte
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Single treatment with RNAi against prion protein rescues early neuronal dysfunction and prolongs survival in mice with prion disease.

Authors:  Melanie D White; Michael Farmer; Ilaria Mirabile; Sebastian Brandner; John Collinge; Giovanna R Mallucci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High prion and PrPSc levels but delayed onset of disease in scrapie-inoculated mice heterozygous for a disrupted PrP gene.

Authors:  H Büeler; A Raeber; A Sailer; M Fischer; A Aguzzi; C Weissmann
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.354

10.  Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies.

Authors:  S B Prusiner; D Groth; A Serban; R Koehler; D Foster; M Torchia; D Burton; S L Yang; S J DeArmond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  16 in total

1.  Prion protein quantification in human cerebrospinal fluid as a tool for prion disease drug development.

Authors:  Sonia M Vallabh; Chloe K Nobuhara; Franc Llorens; Inga Zerr; Piero Parchi; Sabina Capellari; Eric Kuhn; Jacob Klickstein; Jiri G Safar; Flavia C Nery; Kathryn J Swoboda; Michael D Geschwind; Henrik Zetterberg; Steven E Arnold; Eric Vallabh Minikel; Stuart L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Prion-like propagation of protein aggregation and related therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Sarah K Kaufman; Marc I Diamond
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Developing Therapeutics for PrP Prion Diseases.

Authors:  Kurt Giles; Steven H Olson; Stanley B Prusiner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Inability of DNAzymes to cleave RNA in vivo is due to limited Mg[Formula: see text] concentration in cells.

Authors:  Julian Victor; Gerhard Steger; Detlev Riesner
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Multimodal small-molecule screening for human prion protein binders.

Authors:  Andrew G Reidenbach; Michael F Mesleh; Dominick Casalena; Sonia M Vallabh; Jayme L Dahlin; Alison J Leed; Alix I Chan; Dmitry L Usanov; Jenna B Yehl; Christopher T Lemke; Arthur J Campbell; Rishi N Shah; Om K Shrestha; Joshua R Sacher; Victor L Rangel; Jamie A Moroco; Murugappan Sathappa; Maria Cristina Nonato; Kong T Nguyen; S Kirk Wright; David R Liu; Florence F Wagner; Virendar K Kaushik; Douglas S Auld; Stuart L Schreiber; Eric Vallabh Minikel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Quantifying prion disease penetrance using large population control cohorts.

Authors:  Eric Vallabh Minikel; Sonia M Vallabh; Monkol Lek; Karol Estrada; Kaitlin E Samocha; J Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Cory Y McLean; Joyce Y Tung; Linda P C Yu; Pierluigi Gambetti; Janis Blevins; Shulin Zhang; Yvonne Cohen; Wei Chen; Masahito Yamada; Tsuyoshi Hamaguchi; Nobuo Sanjo; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Yosikazu Nakamura; Tetsuyuki Kitamoto; Steven J Collins; Alison Boyd; Robert G Will; Richard Knight; Claudia Ponto; Inga Zerr; Theo F J Kraus; Sabina Eigenbrod; Armin Giese; Miguel Calero; Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta; Stéphane Haïk; Jean-Louis Laplanche; Elodie Bouaziz-Amar; Jean-Philippe Brandel; Sabina Capellari; Piero Parchi; Anna Poleggi; Anna Ladogana; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Konrad J Karczewski; Jamie L Marshall; Michael Boehnke; Markku Laakso; Karen L Mohlke; Anna Kähler; Kimberly Chambert; Steven McCarroll; Patrick F Sullivan; Christina M Hultman; Shaun M Purcell; Pamela Sklar; Sven J van der Lee; Annemieke Rozemuller; Casper Jansen; Albert Hofman; Robert Kraaij; Jeroen G J van Rooij; M Arfan Ikram; André G Uitterlinden; Cornelia M van Duijn; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  Comprehensive and Methodical: Diagnostic and Management Approaches to Rapidly Progressive Dementia.

Authors:  Supriya Mahajan; Brian S Appleby
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Functional genomics screen identifies proteostasis targets that modulate prion protein (PrP) stability.

Authors:  Jennifer Abrams; Taylor Arhar; Sue Ann Mok; Isabelle R Taylor; Martin Kampmann; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.827

Review 9.  The role of prion strain diversity in the development of successful therapeutic treatments.

Authors:  Sara A M Holec; Alyssa J Block; Jason C Bartz
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.622

10.  Identification and Characterization of the V(D)J Recombination Activating Gene 1 in Long-Term Memory of Context Fear Conditioning.

Authors:  Edgardo Castro-Pérez; Emilio Soto-Soto; Marizabeth Pérez-Carambot; Dawling Dionisio-Santos; Kristian Saied-Santiago; Humberto G Ortiz-Zuazaga; Sandra Peña de Ortiz
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.