| Literature DB >> 23344114 |
Bhavanath Jha1, Kumari Kavita, Jenny Westphal, Anton Hartmann, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin.
Abstract
The majority of the marine algal species, though completing their life cycle in seawater, are rarely susceptible to fouling, making them an important source of quorum sensing (QS) inhibitory substances. The separation and characterization of QS inhibitors are crucial for any potential application. Thirty marine macroalgae were tested for QS inhibition activity by using Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 as the reporter strain, and among them, Asparagopsis taxiformis showed antibacterial, as well as antiquorum, sensing activities. Cinnamaldehyde (75 mM) and methanol were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The antiquorum sensing activity of A. taxiformis was further confirmed using the sensor strain, Serratia liquefaciens MG44, having green fluorescent protein (gfp). Methanolic extract of the alga was fractionated by solid phase extraction (SPE), and each fraction was tested for QS inhibition. Two types of activities were observed-zone of clearance (antibacterial activity) and zone of inhibition with or without finger-like projections (QS inhibition). Out of five SPE cartridges, Bond Elut PH showed clear separation of these two fractions. The Ion Cyclotron Resonance Fourier Transformation Mass Spectrometer (ICR-FT/MS) analysis of the fractions further supported the bioassay results. The presence of strong QS inhibitory compound in A. taxiformis indicates its potential use in antifouling preparations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23344114 PMCID: PMC3564170 DOI: 10.3390/md11010253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
List of algal samples (from all the three divisions: Chlorophyta, phaeophyta and rhodophyta) screened for quorum sensing (QS) inhibition activity against Chromobacterium violaceum CV026. The bioassay was performed in triplicates. Methanol was used as negative control, and cinnamaldehyde was used as positive control.
| Serial No. | Name of Algae | Division | Quorum sensing inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 2. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 3. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 4. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 5. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 6. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 7. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 8. |
| Phaeophyta | Negative |
| 9. |
| Rhodophyta | Positive |
| 10. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 11. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 12. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 13. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 14. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 15. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 16. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 17. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 18. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 19. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 20. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 21. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 22. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 23. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 24. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 25. |
| Rhodophyta | Negative |
| 26. |
| Chlorophyta | Negative |
| 27. |
| Chlorophyta | Negative |
| 28. |
| Chlorophyta | Negative |
| 29. |
| Chlorophyta | Negative |
| 30. |
| Chlorophyta | Negative |
Figure 1(a) Z: Cinnamaldehyde as positive control and M: Methanol as negative control; (b) Antibacterial and antiquorum sensing activity by A. taxiformis extract; the central part shows growth inhibition (GI), indicating antibacterial activity, and the peripheral part shows Quorum sensing inhibition (QSI).
Summary of results of quorum sensing inhibition bioassay of fractions eluted using five different cartridges (Bond Elut C2, C18, CN-E, PH and PPL). The results of bioassay were expressed as: (+) denotes slight (faint) effect, + denotes minimal effect, ++ denotes medium effect, +++ denotes highest effect and − denotes absence of effect. “Fing” denotes finger like projection. The bioassays were performed in triplicates. SPE: solid phase extraction.
| Bioassay results of fractions of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond Elut SPE cartridges | Effects on plate based bioassay | Methanol (v/v) | |||||||||
| 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% | ||
| C2 | QS inhibition | (+) | − | − | (+) | − | − | (+) | − | − | + |
| Zone of clearance | − | − | − | − | ++ | +++ | − | − | − | − | |
| C18 | QS inhibition | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | +fing | (+)fing |
| Zone of clearance | − | − | − | − | − | − | ++ | +++ | − | − | |
| CN-E | QS inhibition | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Zone of clearance | − | − | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | − | − | |
| PH | QS inhibition | − | − | − | − | ++ | − | − | ++ | (+)fing | +fing |
| Zone of clearance | − | − | − | − | − | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | |
| PPL | QS inhibition | +fing | − | − | − | − | − | − | (+)fing | +fing | ++fing |
| Zone of clearance | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
Characterization of used SPE cartridges for fractionation of extract of A. taxiformis. All cartridges were equipped with the following dimensions: 100 mg, 1 mL, 40 μm particle size.
| Bond Elut SPE-Cartridges | Type of Material | Properties | Primary Retention Mechanism | Typical Sample Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2 | Silica based, ethyl bonded, endcapped | Alternative sorbent, if analytes are retained too strongly on C8 or C18 phases | Weakly nonpolar | Plasma, urine, aqueous samples |
| C18 | Silica based, trifunctional octadecyl bonded, endcapped | Extreme retentive nature for nonpolar compounds, applicable for desalting aqueous matrices | Strongly nonpolar | Water, aqueous biological fluids |
| CN-E | Silica based, cyanopropyl bonded, endcapped | Ideal sorbent for extracting extremely nonpolar compounds | Moderately nonpolar (aqueous matrix) or polar (nonpolar organic matrix) | Aqueous samples (nonpolar), organic samples (polar) |
| PH | Silica based, phenyl bonded, endcapped | Different selectivity to alkyl and aliphatic functionalized phases due to electron density of the aromatic ring | Moderately nonpolar | Water, biological fluids |
| PPL | Styrene-divinylbenzene (SDVB) polymer with a proprietary derivitized nonpolar surface | Extreme hydrophobicity and surface area, achieves high recovery levels and fast extraction speeds | Highly polar | Waste water (phenols) |
Figure 2Quorum sensing inhibition activity of A. taxiformis extract fractions against: (a) quorum sensing Inhibition with finger-like projection (QSIF); (b) Quorum sensing Inhibition (QSI); (c) Growth inhibition (GI) showing fraction with antibacterial activity.
Figure 3Disc diffusion assay for testing the antibacterial activity of the extract and fractions of A. taxiformis against strain CV026: (a) extract; (b) fraction showing GI; (c) fraction showing QS inhibition; and (d) control (methanol).
Figure 4Inhibition of Green fluorescent protein (gfp) expression by algal extract (Asparagopsis taxiformis) (a) Serratia liquefaciens + N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHL); (b) Serratia liquefaciens + AHL + Extract (Asparagopsis taxiformis). The bioassay was performed in triplicate.
Figure 5Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ICR-FT/MS) spectra of SPE extracts overlaid (fractions showing antibacterial activity colored red, QS inhibition in blue). (a) Represents full spectra; (b) Zoomed into one nominal mass; and (c) zoomed into one single signal.