OBJECTIVES: Animal evidence suggests that circadian disruption may be associated with ovarian cancer, though very little epidemiological work has been done to assess this potential association. We evaluated the association between self-reported nightshift work, a known circadian disruptor, and ovarian cancer in a population-based case-control study. METHODS: The study included 1101 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, 389 women with borderline epithelial ovarian tumours and 1832 controls and was conducted in western Washington state. Shift work data were collected as part of inperson interviews. RESULTS: Working the nightshift was associated with an increased risk of invasive (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49) and borderline (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.90) tumours; however, we observed little evidence that risks increased with increasing cumulative duration of nightshift work, and risks were not elevated in the highest duration category (>7 nightshift work-years). Increased risks were restricted to women who were 50 years of age and older and to serous and mucinous histologies of invasive and borderline tumours. There was suggestive evidence of a decreased risk of ovarian cancer among women reporting a preference for activity during evenings rather than mornings. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence suggesting an association between shift work and ovarian cancer. This observation should be followed up in future studies incorporating detailed assessments of diurnal preference (ie, chronotype) in addition to detailed data on shift schedules.
OBJECTIVES: Animal evidence suggests that circadian disruption may be associated with ovarian cancer, though very little epidemiological work has been done to assess this potential association. We evaluated the association between self-reported nightshift work, a known circadian disruptor, and ovarian cancer in a population-based case-control study. METHODS: The study included 1101 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, 389 women with borderline epithelial ovarian tumours and 1832 controls and was conducted in western Washington state. Shift work data were collected as part of inperson interviews. RESULTS: Working the nightshift was associated with an increased risk of invasive (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49) and borderline (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.90) tumours; however, we observed little evidence that risks increased with increasing cumulative duration of nightshift work, and risks were not elevated in the highest duration category (>7 nightshift work-years). Increased risks were restricted to women who were 50 years of age and older and to serous and mucinous histologies of invasive and borderline tumours. There was suggestive evidence of a decreased risk of ovarian cancer among women reporting a preference for activity during evenings rather than mornings. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence suggesting an association between shift work and ovarian cancer. This observation should be followed up in future studies incorporating detailed assessments of diurnal preference (ie, chronotype) in addition to detailed data on shift schedules.
Authors: Clara Bodelon; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Kristine G Wicklund; Jennifer A Doherty; Mary Anne Rossing Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Eva S Schernhammer; Francine Laden; Frank E Speizer; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter; Ichiro Kawachi; Charles S Fuchs; Graham A Colditz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Mary Anne Rossing; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Kristine G Wicklund; Jennifer A Doherty; Noel S Weiss Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Charleen D Adams; Kristina M Jordahl; Wade Copeland; Dana K Mirick; Xiaoling Song; Cassandra L Sather; Karl Kelsey; Andres Houseman; Scott Davis; Timothy Randolph; Parveen Bhatti Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Elizabeth M Poole; Eva Schernhammer; Leigha Mills; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Robin M Voigt; Christopher B Forsyth; Stefan J Green; Ece Mutlu; Phillip Engen; Martha H Vitaterna; Fred W Turek; Ali Keshavarzian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leticia M Nogueira; Joshua N Sampson; Lisa W Chu; Kai Yu; Gerald Andriole; Timothy Church; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jill Koshiol; Ann W Hsing Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Hui-Yi Lin; Jonathan P Tyrer; Kate Lawrenson; Joe Dennis; Ganna Chornokur; Zhihua Chen; Ann Y Chen; Jennifer Permuth-Wey; Katja Kh Aben; Hoda Anton-Culver; Natalia Antonenkova; Fiona Bruinsma; Elisa V Bandera; Yukie T Bean; Matthias W Beckmann; Maria Bisogna; Line Bjorge; Natalia Bogdanova; Louise A Brinton; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Clareann H Bunker; Ralf Butzow; Ian G Campbell; Karen Carty; Jenny Chang-Claude; Linda S Cook; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; Cezary Cybulski; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Andreas du Bois; Evelyn Despierre; Weiva Sieh; Jennifer A Doherty; Thilo Dörk; Matthias Dürst; Douglas F Easton; Diana M Eccles; Robert P Edwards; Arif B Ekici; Peter A Fasching; Brooke L Fridley; Yu-Tang Gao; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Graham G Giles; Rosalind Glasspool; Marc T Goodman; Jacek Gronwald; Philipp Harter; Hanis N Hasmad; Alexander Hein; Florian Heitz; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Peter Hillemanns; Claus K Hogdall; Estrid Hogdall; Satoyo Hosono; Edwin S Iversen; Anna Jakubowska; Allan Jensen; Bu-Tian Ji; Beth Y Karlan; Melissa Kellar; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Camilla Krakstad; Susanne K Kjaer; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk; Robert A Vierkant; Diether Lambrechts; Sandrina Lambrechts; Nhu D Le; Alice W Lee; Shashi Lele; Arto Leminen; Jenny Lester; Douglas A Levine; Dong Liang; Boon Kiong Lim; Jolanta Lissowska; Karen Lu; Jan Lubinski; Lene Lundvall; Leon F A G Massuger; Keitaro Matsuo; Valerie McGuire; John R McLaughlin; Ian McNeish; Usha Menon; Roger L Milne; Francesmary Modugno; Lotte Thomsen; Kirsten B Moysich; Roberta B Ness; Heli Nevanlinna; Ursula Eilber; Kunle Odunsi; Sara H Olson; Irene Orlow; Sandra Orsulic; Rachel Palmieri Weber; James Paul; Celeste L Pearce; Tanja Pejovic; Liisa M Pelttari; Malcolm C Pike; Elizabeth M Poole; Eva Schernhammer; Harvey A Risch; Barry Rosen; Mary Anne Rossing; Joseph H Rothstein; Anja Rudolph; Ingo B Runnebaum; Iwona K Rzepecka; Helga B Salvesen; Ira Schwaab; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yurii B Shvetsov; Nadeem Siddiqui; Honglin Song; Melissa C Southey; Beata Spiewankiewicz; Lara Sucheston-Campbell; Soo-Hwang Teo; Kathryn L Terry; Pamela J Thompson; Ingvild L Tangen; Shelley S Tworoger; Anne M van Altena; Ignace Vergote; Christine S Walsh; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Nicolas Wentzensen; Alice S Whittemore; Kristine G Wicklund; Lynne R Wilkens; Anna H Wu; Xifeng Wu; Yin-Ling Woo; Hannah Yang; Wei Zheng; Argyrios Ziogas; Ernest Amankwah; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen M Schildkraut; Linda E Kelemen; Susan J Ramus; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Ellen L Goode; Steven A Narod; Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah; Thomas A Sellers; Catherine M Phelan Journal: J Genet Genome Res Date: 2015-09-15