Riboswitches are RNA sensors that change conformation upon binding small molecule metabolites, in turn modulating gene expression. Our understanding of riboswitch regulatory function would be accelerated by a high-throughput, quantitative screening tool capable of measuring riboswitch-ligand binding. We introduce a microfluidic mobility shift assay that enables precise and rapid quantitation of ligand binding and subsequent riboswitch conformational change. In 0.3% of the time required for benchtop assays (3.2 versus 1020 min), we screen and validate five candidate SAM-I riboswitches isolated from thermophilic and cryophilic bacteria. The format offers enhanced resolution of conformational change compared to slab gel formats, quantitation, and repeatability for statistical assessment of small mobility shifts, low reagent consumption, and riboswitch characterization without modification of the aptamer structure. Appreciable analytical sensitivity coupled with high-resolution separation performance allows quantitation of equilibrium dissociation constants (K(d)) for both rapidly and slowly interconverting riboswitch-ligand pairs as validated through experiments and modeling. Conformational change, triplicate mobility shift measurements, and K(d) are reported for both a known and a candidate SAM-I riboswitch with comparison to in-line probing assay results. The microfluidic mobility shift assay establishes a scalable format for the study of riboswitch-ligand binding that will advance the discovery and selection of novel riboswitches and the development of antibiotics to target bacterial riboswitches.
Riboswitches are RNA sensors that change conformation upon binding small molecule metabolites, in turn modulating gene expression. Our understanding of riboswitch regulatory function would be accelerated by a high-throughput, quantitative screening tool capable of measuring riboswitch-ligand binding. We introduce a microfluidic mobility shift assay that enables precise and rapid quantitation of ligand binding and subsequent riboswitch conformational change. In 0.3% of the time required for benchtop assays (3.2 versus 1020 min), we screen and validate five candidate SAM-I riboswitches isolated from thermophilic and cryophilic bacteria. The format offers enhanced resolution of conformational change compared to slab gel formats, quantitation, and repeatability for statistical assessment of small mobility shifts, low reagent consumption, and riboswitch characterization without modification of the aptamer structure. Appreciable analytical sensitivity coupled with high-resolution separation performance allows quantitation of equilibrium dissociation constants (K(d)) for both rapidly and slowly interconverting riboswitch-ligand pairs as validated through experiments and modeling. Conformational change, triplicate mobility shift measurements, and K(d) are reported for both a known and a candidate pan class="Chemical">SAM-I riboswitch with comparison to in-line probing assay results. The microfluidic mobility shift assay establishes a scalable format for the study of riboswitch-ligand binding that will advance the discovery and selection of novel riboswitches and the development of antibiotics to target bacterial riboswitches.
Authors: Michelle M Meyer; Ming C Hammond; Yasmmyn Salinas; Adam Roth; Narasimhan Sudarsan; Ronald R Breaker Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Zasha Weinberg; Joy X Wang; Jarrod Bogue; Jingying Yang; Keith Corbino; Ryan H Moy; Ronald R Breaker Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Kwanghun Chung; Yoosik Kim; Jitendra S Kanodia; Emily Gong; Stanislav Y Shvartsman; Hang Lu Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-12-26 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Colleen A Kellenberger; Stephen C Wilson; Scott F Hickey; Tania L Gonzalez; Yichi Su; Zachary F Hallberg; Thomas F Brewer; Anthony T Iavarone; Hans K Carlson; Yu-Fang Hsieh; Ming C Hammond Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Colleen A Kellenberger; Jade Sales-Lee; Yuchen Pan; Madalee M Gassaway; Amy E Herr; Ming C Hammond Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Xing Li; Liuting Mo; Jacob L Litke; Sourav Kumar Dey; Scott R Suter; Samie R Jaffrey Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 15.419