Yumi Shitama Jarris1, Alison Bartleman, Erin Carlyle Hall, Lisa Lopez. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Family Medicine Department, 3900 Reservoir Rd NW, GM4 Preclinical Science Bldg, Washington, DC 20007, USA. yj33@georgetown.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a newly reformed curriculum for teaching culturally responsive care and to build awareness of health and health care disparities in first-year medical students. Secondary outcomes were to determine if a progressive approach to teaching this content would improve not only knowledge of vulnerable groups but also awareness of inherent personal biases and cultural assumptions, which contribute to inequitable care. PROCEDURES: Students enrolled in Social and Cultural Issues in Health Care from October 2009 through December 2009, who agreed to participate, completed pretests and posttests that assessed their awareness and knowledge of culturally responsive care and health disparities. FINDINGS: In 3 of the questions assessing cultural awareness, the participants improved significantly after the course compared to before the course. Participants also significantly improved in 6 of the 7 knowledge-based questions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that this innovative curriculum was successful in improving students' knowledge of vulnerable populations and health disparities. Our progressive curricular approach also successfully increased participant awareness of health disparities by requiring students to assess the socioeconomic and environmental factors of inequitable care. Additionally, it emphasized a process of continuous self-appraisal in delivering culturally responsive care.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a newly reformed curriculum for teaching culturally responsive care and to build awareness of health and health care disparities in first-year medical students. Secondary outcomes were to determine if a progressive approach to teaching this content would improve not only knowledge of vulnerable groups but also awareness of inherent personal biases and cultural assumptions, which contribute to inequitable care. PROCEDURES: Students enrolled in Social and Cultural Issues in Health Care from October 2009 through December 2009, who agreed to participate, completed pretests and posttests that assessed their awareness and knowledge of culturally responsive care and health disparities. FINDINGS: In 3 of the questions assessing cultural awareness, the participants improved significantly after the course compared to before the course. Participants also significantly improved in 6 of the 7 knowledge-based questions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that this innovative curriculum was successful in improving students' knowledge of vulnerable populations and health disparities. Our progressive curricular approach also successfully increased participant awareness of health disparities by requiring students to assess the socioeconomic and environmental factors of inequitable care. Additionally, it emphasized a process of continuous self-appraisal in delivering culturally responsive care.
Authors: Juan R Deliz; Fayola F Fears; Kai E Jones; Jenny Tobat; Douglas Char; Will R Ross Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Patricia A Carney; Ryan T Palmer; Marissa Fuqua Miller; Erin K Thayer; Sue E Estroff; Debra K Litzelman; Frances E Biagioli; Cayla R Teal; Ann Lambros; William J Hatt; Jason M Satterfield Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Katie E Pettit; Joseph S Turner; Jason K Kindrat; Gregory J Blythe; Greg E Hasty; Anthony J Perkins; Leslie Ashburn-Nardo; Lesley B Milgrom; Cherri D Hobgood; Dylan D Cooper Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2017-03-22
Authors: Mark McKinney; Katherine E Smith; Kathryn A Dong; Oksana Babenko; Shelley Ross; Martina A Kelly; Ginetta Salvalaggio Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 2.655