| Literature DB >> 23342278 |
Noriaki Yoshida1, Akira Umino, Fang Liu, Kotaro Arita, Kennosuke Karube, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Koichi Ohshima, Masao Seto.
Abstract
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) with genomic aberrations has been shown to resemble lymphoma-type adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) in terms of its genomic aberration patterns, histopathology, and prognosis. We have shown recently that a majority of patients with acute-type ATLL have multiple subclones that were likely produced in lymph nodes. In this study, we analyzed whether PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations also has multiple subclones as found in ATLL by means of high-resolution oligo-array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Thirteen cases of PTCL, NOS were available for 44K high-resolution array CGH analysis. The results showed that 11 (84.6%) of the 13 cases had a log2 ratio imbalance, suggesting that multiple subclones exist in PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations. In order to analyze the association between multiple subclones and prognosis, we used previous bacterial-artificial chromosome (BAC) array analyses for 29 cases and found that the existence of multiple subclones was associated with a poor prognosis (P = 0.0279).Entities:
Keywords: Multiple subclones, not otherwise specified; oligo-array comparative genomic hybridization; peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23342278 PMCID: PMC3544466 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Patients information and results of array CGH
| PTCL no. | Age (y.o.) | Sex | IPI | TCR rearrangement | Nuclear size | Genomic aberrations | Genomic imbalance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 64 | Male | 3 HI | R | 2 | Positive | Positive |
| 29 | 76 | Female | 3HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
| 33 | 70 | Male | 4 HI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 35 | 69 | Female | 2 LI | R | 4 | Positive | None |
| 36 | 43 | Female | N | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 39 | 48 | Male | 3 HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
| 43 | 57 | Male | 3 or 4 | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 44 | 53 | Male | 3 LI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 46 | 56 | Male | 2 HI | R | 4 | Positive | Positive |
| 47 | 46 | Male | 1 L | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 48 | 79 | Male | 4 HI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
| 50 | 80 | Female | 4 HI | R | 2 | Positive | None |
| 51 | NA | Female | 2 LI | R | 5 | Positive | Positive |
IPI, International Prognostic Index; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; NA, not available; R, rearrangement; NE, not evaluable; y.o., years old.
Representations in previous Nakagawa et al. [7] paper were used.
Numbers with 1–5 indicating small, medium, large, anaplastic, and pleomorphic nuclei, respectively.
Figure 1Genomic profiles of two cases with the log2 ratio imbalance evaluated by loss regions. (A) Array CGH result for Case 36. A typical log2 ratio imbalance was found in this case. We detected regions of loss on whole chromosomes 3, 13, 16, and 17. The log2 ratios of chromosomes 3 and 13 are −0.61, while those of chromosomes 16 and 17 are −0.33 and −0.51, respectively. (B) Case 46 showed a more complex log2 ratio imbalance for several chromosomes (arrows and arrowhead).
Figure 2Genomic profiles of cases with the log2 ratio imbalance evaluated by gain regions. (A) Analysis of Case 33. Regions of gain involved chromosomes 2, 3, 7, and 14. The log2 ratio of 3q is 0.42 (arrowhead) and of other regions is 0.23 (arrows). (B) The log2 ratios of gain in Case 43 are more complex (arrows).
Figure 3Possible schema of multiple subclones based on the different log2 ratios among chromosomes. (A) Case 36 is shown as monoclonal by T-cell receptor gene rearrangement. The average log2 ratio of aberrant regions reflected the ratio of tumors. In this case, all tumor cells are speculated to have regions of loss on chromosomes 3 and 13 based on the log2 ratio of the lowest level of −0.61. The log2 ratio of chromosome 17 is −0.51, which indicates that 83% (−0.51/−0.61) of tumor cells have a region of loss on chromosome 17. The log2 ratio of chromosome 16 is −0.33, which indicates that 54% (−0.33/−0.61) of tumor cells have a region of loss on chromosome 16. Thus, it is likely that 17% (100–83%) of tumor cells have losses only on chromosomes 3 and 13. Twenty-nine percent (83–54%) of tumor cells have losses on chromosomes 3, 13, and 17. The remaining 54% of tumor cells may comprise tumor cells with losses on chromosomes 3, 13, 17, and 16 or those with losses on chromosomes 3, 13, and 16. The ratio of these two subclones cannot be evaluated. (B) A model of clonal evolution in Case 36. According to the log2 ratio and imbalance in this case, the original tumor cell grows and accumulates genetic aberrations during clonal evolution as indicated by the arrows.
Figure 4OS of patients with PTCL, NOS in relation to multiple subclones. The overall survival (OS) of PTCL, NOS patients with multiple subclones was inferior to that of patients without subclones.